Skip to main content

Optimizing Budget Allocations in Naval Configuration Management

  • Chapter
Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management

Part of the book series: Engineering Asset Management Review ((EAMR,volume 1))

Abstract

This paper describes a case study illustration of a technique that can be used to optimize capital expenditure budget decisions for engineering assets under multivariate objectives and uncertain costs. We define measures of capability increase relative to mission types and measures for risk, return and pseudo-correlation on potential maintenance upgrades, allowing portfolio optimization techniques from finance to be applied to asset management decisions. The results provide a risk-reward ratio for investment allocation decisions that is optimal. The work is aimed at capability management for naval platforms, but the technique has broader applicability in the field of asset management and multi-criteria decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ADFP Australian Defence Force Publication 101 (1994). Glossary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Maritime Doctrine (2000) RAN Doctrine 1. www.navy.gov.au/spc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin A, Falta M, Su S, Turner L, Willett R, Wolff R (2010) ‘A Statistical Activity Cost Analysis of Engineering Assets’ Engineering Asset Management Reviews Vol 1, pp. 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson J, Spackman M, Pearman A, Phillips L (2000) ‘Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Manual’. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd K (2005) Measuring Market Risk (2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton EJ, Gruber MJ (1996) Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings M, Jenkins S (1983) The Battle for the Falklands. Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hightower ML, David A (1991) Portfolio Modeling: A Technique for Sophisticated Oil and Gas Investors. SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, 11–12 April 1991, Dallas, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Performance and Value Trade-offs. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1952) ‘Portfolio selection’. Journal of Finance 7(1):77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM, Todd GP (1987) Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Frank J. Fabozzi & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebonato R, Jäckel P (2000) ‘The most general methodology to create a valid correlation matrix for risk management and option pricing purposes’. Journal of Risk (2): 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Vol 1. RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett RJ (1991) ‘Transaction Theory, Stochastic Processes and Derived Accounting Measurement’. ABACUS (27) 2: 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind Y, Mahajan, V (1981) ‘Designing Product and Business Portfolios’. Harvard Business Review January-February: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colin, A., Willett, R., Lambrineas, P. (2010). Optimizing Budget Allocations in Naval Configuration Management. In: Amadi-Echendu, J., Brown, K., Willett, R., Mathew, J. (eds) Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management. Engineering Asset Management Review, vol 1. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-178-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-178-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-177-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-178-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics