Skip to main content

Ontology-Driven Hypothesis Generation to Explain Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI

Abstract

Within the medical domain there are clear expectations as to how a patient should respond to treatments administered. When these responses are not observed it can be challenging for clinicians to understand the anomalous responses. The work reported here describes a tool which can detect anomalous patient responses to treatment and further suggest hypotheses to explain the anomaly. In order to develop this tool, we have undertaken a study to determine how Intensive Care Unit (ICU) clinicians identify anomalous patient responses; we then asked further clinicians to provide potential explanations for such anomalies. The high level reasoning deployed by the clinicians has been captured and generalised to form the procedural component of the ontology-driven tool. An evaluation has shown that the tool successfully reproduced the clinician’s hypotheses in the majority of cases. Finally, the paper concludes by describing planned extensions to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. MIMIC II Project, Accessed August 2009. http://mimic.mit.edu/index.html.

  2. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), Accessed August 2009. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umls.html.

  3. Blum, R L. Discovery, Confirmation, and Incorporation of Causal Relationships From a Large Time-Oriented Clinical Data Base: The RX Project. COMP. AND BIOMED. RES., 15:164–187, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce G. Buchanan and Edward A.Feigenbaum Dendral and Meta-Dendral: Their Applications Dimension. Artificial Intelligence, 11:5–24, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark. A. Chinn, William F. Brewer. Factors that Influence How People Respond to Anomalies. In Proc. of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaap van den Heuvel, J. D. B. Stemerdink, Ad J. J. C. Bogers and David S. Bree. GUUS an expert system in the intensive care unit. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 7:171–175, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Juliet Corbin, Anselm Strauss. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13:3–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Dunbar. Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain. Cognitive Science, 17:397–434, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K.Anders Ericsson and Herbert A. Simon. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kent A. Spackman, Keith E.Campbell. SNOMED RT:A Reference Terminology for Health Care.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L Darden. Strategies for Anomaly Resolution. Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, :, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laura Moss, Derek Sleeman, Malcolm Booth, Malcolm Daniel, Lyndsay Donaldson, Charlotte Gilhooly, Martin Hughes, Malcolm Sim and John Kinsella. Explaining Anomalous Responses to Treatment in the Intensive Care Unit. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME09, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael G.Walker and GioWiederhold. Acquisition and Validation of Knowledge from Data. Intelligent Systems, :415–428, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N.F de Keizer, A.Abu-Hanna, R.Cornet, J.H.M. Zwetsloot-Schonk, C.P.Stoutenbeek. Analysis and Design of an Ontology for Intensive Care Diagnoses. Methods of Information in Medicine, 38:102–112, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paul Thagard. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.Langley, G.L. Bradshaw, and H.A Simon. Rediscovering ChemistryWith the Bacon System. Machine Learning, pages 307–329, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silvia Miksch, Werner Horn, Chrisitan Popow, Franz Paky. VIE-VENT: knowledge-based monitoring and therapy planning of the artificial ventilation of newborn infants. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 10:218–229, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vimla L. Patel, Jiajie Zhang, Nicole A. Yoskowitz, Robert Green, Osman R.Sayan. Translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 41:413–431, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuval Shahar and Mark A. Musen. Knowledge-Based Temporal Abstraction in Clinical Domains. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 8:267–298, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moss, L. et al. (2010). Ontology-Driven Hypothesis Generation to Explain Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatment. In: Bramer, M., Ellis, R., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-983-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-983-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-982-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-983-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics