Skip to main content

Principles in Hernia Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3018 Accesses

Abstract

Abdominal wall hernia surgery is no different from any other surgical procedure in that the rules of appropriate patient selection and preparation apply. The mortality from hernia surgery relates either to operating prior to optimization of the patient or to complications of the surgery itself. An analysis of the Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality noted inadequate resuscitation, failure to use HDU, and inadequate perioperative monitoring as adverse factors contributing to death [1]. Most hernias never require emergency surgery, and 4 or 5 h of careful resuscitation may be beneficial in the most ill patients [2]. Analysis of the Swedish Hernia registry revealed a sevenfold increase if the surgery was performed as an emergency and a 20-fold increase if bowel resection was undertaken [3]. The same principles apply for elective hernia surgery: -fully assessment and optimization of the patient prior to embarking on surgery. An analysis of 175 patients with ages greater than 66 years, of whom 58 % were ASA III or higher, revealed that elective or urgent operation can be carried out with zero mortality, provided prompt diagnosis and management of primary systemic diseases are performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mcgugan E, Burton H, Nixon S, Thompson A. Deaths following hernia surgery: room for improvement. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000;45(3):183–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buck N, Devlin HB, Lunn JN. The report of a confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust and the King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamäki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P. Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Gothenburg, Sweden mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(4):656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-García J, Seco-Gil JL. Antibiotic ­prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18(3):CD003769.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielson M, et al. European guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Angelini GD, Butchart EG, Armistead SH, Breckenridge IM. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations. Thorax. 1984;39:942–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert AI, Felton LL. Infection in inguinal hernia repair considering biomaterials and antibiotics. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:126–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Devlin HB, Gillen PHA, Waxman BP, Macnay RA. Short stay surgery for inguinal hernia: experience of the Shouldice operation 1970–1982. Br J Surg. 1986;73:123–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glassow F. Is post-operative wound infection following simple inguinal herniorrhaphy a predisposing cause of recurrent hernia? Can Med Assoc J. 1964;91:870–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Howes EL. Effects of suture material on the tensile strength of wound repair. Ann Surg. 1933;98:153–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howes EL. The strength of wounds sutured with catgut and silk. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1933;57:309.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Douglas DM. The healing of aponeurotic incisions. Br J Surg. 1952;40:79–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas DM, Forrester JC, Ogilvie RR. Physical characteristics of collagen in the later stages of wound healing. Br J Surg. 1969;56:219–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mason ML, Allen HS. The rate of healing of tendons: an experimental study of tensile strength. Ann Surg. 1941;113:424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE, Rhynes KV, Baker DS, Stout R. Tissue attachment strength of prosthetic meshes used in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a study in the New Zealand white rabbit adhesion model. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(11):1542–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD. Incisional hernias, when do they occur? Br J Surg. 1983;70:290–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamlin JA, Kahn AM. Herniography in symptomatic patients ­following inguinal hernia repair. West J Med. 1995;162:28–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;140:7–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rath AM, Chevrel JP. The healing of laparotomies: review of the literature. Part 1. Hernia. 1998;2:145–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klinge U, Prescher A, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. Origin and pathophysiology of abdominal wall defects. Chirurg. 1997;68:293–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt TK, Goodson WH III. Wound Healing. In: Way LW, editor. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment, 9th ed. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange; 1991. p. 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forrest I. Current concepts in soft connective tissue wound healing. Br J Surg. 1983;70:133–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandblom P. The tensile strength of healing wounds: an experimental study. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1944;891–1088 +.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schilling JA. Advances in knowledge related to wounding, repair and healing: 1885–1984. Ann Surg. 1985;201:268–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aird I. Companion in surgical studies. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Artandi C. A revolution in sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980;150:235–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez-Montes I, Deysine M. Spigelian hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133:670–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Winkle WJR, Hastings JC. Considerations in the choice of suture materials for various tissues. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;135:113–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moynihan BGA. The ritual of a surgical operation. Br J Surg. 1920;8:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrew DR, Williamson KM. Meckel’s diverticulum—rare complications and review of the literature. J R Army Med Corps. 1994;140:143–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tagart REB. The suturing of abdominal incisions. A comparison of monofilament nylon and catgut. Br J Surg. 1967;54:952–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lerwick E. Studies of the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;156:51–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ray IA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A. Polydioxanone (PDS) a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;153:497–507.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Irvin TT, Koffman CG, Duthie HL. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials. Br J Surg. 1976;63:793–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Halsted WS. The radical cure of hernia. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1889;1:12–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leaper DJ. Laparotomy closure. Br J Hosp Med. 1985;33:317–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Whipple AO. The use of silk in the repair of clean wounds. Ann Surg. 1933;98:662–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayer AD, Ausobsky JR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Compression suture of the abdominal wall: a controlled trial in 302 major laparotomies. Br J Surg. 1981;68:632–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Herman RE. Abdominal wound closure using a new polypropylene monofilament suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;138:84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Herrman NIB. Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials. Am Surg. 1971;37:209–17.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jones DJ. Braided versus monofilament sutures in inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1986;73:414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jenkins TPN. Incisional hernia repair: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg. 1980;67:335–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:175–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Israelsson LA. The surgeon as a risk factor for complications of midline incisions. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hodgson NCF, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Muysoms F, Miserez M, Berrevoet G, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Paterson-Brown S, Dudley HAF. Knotting in continuous mass closure of the abdomen. Br J Surg. 1986;73:676–80.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pelosa OA, Wilkinson LH. The chain stitch knot. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139:599–600.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Trimbos JB. Factors relating to the volume of surgical knots. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;30:355–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Eaton AC. A controlled trial to evaluate and compare sutureless skin closure technique (op-site skin closure) with conventional skin suturing and clipping in surgery. Br J Surg. 1980;67:857–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pearse HE. Strangulated hernia reduced en masse. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1931;53:822–8.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taube M, Porter RJ, Lord PH. A combination of subcuticular suture and sterile micropore tape compared with conventional interrupted sutures for skin closure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983;65:164–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pickford IR, Brennan SS, Evans M, Pollock AV. Two methods of skin closure in abdominal operations: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1983;70:226–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ramshaw BJ, Escartia P, Schwab J, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg. 1999;65:827–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Larson GM, Harrower HW. Plastic mesh repair of incisional hernia. Am J Surg. 1978;135:559–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Larson GM, Vandertoll DJ. Approaches to repair of ventral hernia and full thickness loss of the abdominal wall. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64:335–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Usher FC. The repair of incisional and inguinal hernias. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;131:525–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Usher FC. New technique for repairing incisional hernias with Marlex mesh. Am J Surg. 1979;138:740–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Bennett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bennett, D.H. (2013). Principles in Hernia Surgery. In: Kingsnorth, A., LeBlanc, K. (eds) Management of Abdominal Hernias. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-877-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-877-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-876-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-877-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics