Skip to main content

Spore: Assessment of the Science in an Evolution-Oriented Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Spore was introduced in late 2008 with a tremendous amount of publicity, including a National Geographic television documentary, asserting it was revolutionary in two ways: First, its makers consistently implied that it realistically depicted the biological and cultural evolution of species from the cellular stage, through the development of intelligence, tribes, civilization, and even space travel. Second, it combined aspects of solo-play avatar-experienced world, multicharacter but solo-player strategy game, and asynchronous Internet sharing of characters that differs from the typical synchronous online environment. Thus, it claimed to be a valid simulation of the real world, and at the same time, it expanded the definition of an online virtual world.

The chief designer, Will Wright, has a long and influential history as an innovator with a unique perspective on what constitutes a virtual world. SimCity, Wright’s urban planning and city-building game dating from 1989, launched the Maxis company that most recently produced Spore. Early Will Wright games sought to establish connections to science and scholarship, notably through bibliographies included in the instruction manuals for the 1993 edition of his original product, SimCity 2000, and the original 2000 version of The Sims (Bremer 1993; Bentley 2000). Wright has called The Sims a “software toy,” rather than a game, and in common with virtual worlds such as Second Life, it does not require gamelike competition. Rather, it is like an interactive doll house, in which an individual user gradually develops a personalized, home-like environment. A multiuser online version of The Sims was launched in 2002 and shut down in 2008, for offering for nearly 6 years a complex virtual world for thousands of inhabitants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, P. H. (2003) Unnarratable knowledge: The difficulty of understanding evolution by natural selection. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narrative theory and cognitive science (pp. 143-162). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (1985). Cultural genetics. In R. Stark (Ed.), Religious movements (pp. 157-198). New York: Paragon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2006). God from the machine: Artificial intelligence models of religious cognition. Walnut Grove, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). Across the secular abyss. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. (2000). The Sims (user manual). Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. (2008). Flunking Spore. Science 322:531, from (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/322/5901/531b).

  • Bremer, M. (1993). SimCity 2000 user manual. Walnut Creek, CA: Maxis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L, & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, G. V. (1951). Man makes himself. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, N. (1961). The pursuit of the millennium. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D. J. (2005). Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilfillan, C. S. (1935). The sociology of invention. Chicago, IL Follett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogarten, P. J. & Townsend, J. P. (2005). Horizontal gene transfer, Genome innovation and evolution. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3,679-687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. T. (2008a). Evolution as fact, theory, and path. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1,46-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2008b). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 121-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2008c). Evolutionary trends. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1,259-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2,156-175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1979). Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. S. J., Stratton, B., & Knight, M. (2008). Spore: Official game guide. Roseville, CA: Prima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (1996). The end of science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. & Stark, R. (1965). Becoming a world-saver: A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review, 30,862-875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre L. van den Berghe. (1975). Man in society: A biosocial view. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the western pacific. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2000). The gift. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science, 241,1441-1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, L. (1942). Millhands and preachers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A. D. (1976). ‘Disembodied Access’ and technological constraints on organizational development. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15,177-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Dublin: Whitestone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1937-1941). Social and cultural dynamics. New York: American Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1997). The rise of Christianity. San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. S. (1980). Networks of faith. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1376-1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. S. (1987). A theory of religion. New York: Toronto/Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, G. & Bainbridge, W. S. (2003). Memetics: A potential new science. In M. C. Roco & W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.), Converging technologies for improving human performance (pp. 318-325). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. N. (1994). The coevolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe, W. M., Narlikar, J. V., Rajaratnam, P., Harris, M. J. & Lloyd, D. (2003). Progress towards the vindication of panspermia. Astrophysics and Space Science, 283,403-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, J. & Bauer, C. E. (2002). “Complex Evolution of Photosynthesis.” Annual Review of Plant Biology, 53,503-521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohannon, J., Gregory, T.R., Eldredge, N., Bainbridge, W.S. (2010). Spore: Assessment of the Science in an Evolution-Oriented Game. In: Bainbridge, W. (eds) Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-824-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-825-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics