Abstract
While extensive scholarly attention has been paid to various aspects of on-line language programs, the implementation of on-line English-language learning (COEL) programs in business contexts remains an unexplored area in the CALL (computer assisted language learning) literature. Moreover, while many studies have focused on learners’ first usage intentions in TAM (technical acceptance model), few have explored their intentions to continue using them. To address this lacuna, a framework of COEL in order to explore learners’ perceptions of COEL had been developed first. An examination of the proposed two models revealed gaps between learners’ intention of first usage and re-usage of the COEL. Further analyses revealed a significant difference between groups of high intention learners to re-use the COEL and low intention learners to re-use the COEL. A second investigation determined eight factors that contributed to the differences between these two diverse groups of learners. This study’s findings shed light on the relationship between TAM model and the perceived enjoyment, learners’ attitudes, intentions and overall reactions to COEL programs. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are discussed as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Flowerdew, L. (2003). ‘A combined corpus and Systemic Functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing’. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 489-511.
Swales, J. (1997). English as Tyrannosaurus rex. World Englishes, 16, 373-382.
Vollmer, H. (2001). Englisch und mehrsprachigkeit: Interkulturelles lernen durchEnglisch als lingua franca? In: D. Abendroth, Timmer and G. Bach (eds.) Mehrsprachiges Europa. Festschrift für Michael Wendt zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 91-109).Tübingen: Narr.
Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133-158.
Kaufmann, S. (2006). Business English: New approaches are needed to increase the ROI in corporate English learning. Published: 9/27/2006 http://www.buzzle.com/articles/business-english-new-approaches-increase-roicorporate-learning.html. Uploaded 6 June, 2008.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2006b, June). MOE Foreign English Teachers Project for Taiwan’s Public Schools, the Republic of China (Taiwan). Press Release.
Chen, C. H. The teaching behavior differences between native and non-native English teachers in early childhood education. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Providence University, Taiwan. 2005.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. 1991.
Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. International Jl. on E-Learning, 5(4), 571-591.
Ha, I. Yoon, Y. Choi, M., Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276-286.
Kim, M.-s., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research: II. Communication Research, 20(3), 331-364.
Bagozzi, R. P. Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627. 1981.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489. 1982.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society for Training and Development, 13(11), 3-9.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Revisiting Kirkpatrick's Four Level Model. Training and Development 50(1), 54-57.
Arthur, W. J., Bennett, W. J., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234-245. (2003).
Brown, K. G.. An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: A closer look at "smile sheets". Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 991-1001. 2005.
Brown, K. G., & Gerhardt, M. W. Formative evaluation: An integrated practice model and case study. Personnel Psychology, 55, 951-983. 2002.
Noe, R. A. (2002). Employee training and development (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In K. Kraiger (Ed.), Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development: State-of-the-art Lessons for Practice (pp. 192-233). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.
Alexander, S. E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43, 240-248. 2001.
Bonk, C. J. Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.com. 2001.
Mason, R., & Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173-200.
Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education & Training 46(6/7), 335-342.
Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2002). An analysis of student’s preparation for the virtual learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 231-242.
Selim, H. M. (2003). E-Learning critical success factors: An exploratory investigation of student perceptions. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Research Conference at the United Arab Emirates University.
Masoumi, D. (2006). Factors for effective e-learning. The e-quality final seminar Retrieved April 30, 2007, from www.e-quality-eu.org/pdf/seminar/e-Quality_WS3_DMasoumi.pdf
Féraud, G. (2005). Transferring successful corporate training into e-learning in a large international organization: The case of early warning in conflict prevention Systèmes d'Information et Management, 10(2), 89-106.
Soong, M. H. B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36, 101-120.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199-223.
Schwab, D. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Klem, L. (1995). Path analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 65-97). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business Research Methods. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.
Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-110.
Luor, T., Hu, C., & Lu, H. (In press.). Mind the gap’: An empirical study of the intention and actual usage of corporate e-learning programs in the financial industry (2008), British Journal of Educational Technology. (in-press).
Dringus, L. P. (1999). Resource requirements for online learning environments. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 13(4), 20-25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luor, T., Lu, HP., Johanson, R., Wu, LL. (2009). Minding the Gap Between First and Continued Usage: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of a Corporate e-Learning English-Language Program at a Financial Firm in Taiwan. In: Chou, SY., Trappey, A., Pokojski, J., Smith, S. (eds) Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_82
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-761-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-762-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)