Skip to main content

Minding the Gap Between First and Continued Usage: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of a Corporate e-Learning English-Language Program at a Financial Firm in Taiwan

  • Conference paper
Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology

Part of the book series: Advanced Concurrent Engineering ((ACENG))

  • 1896 Accesses

Abstract

While extensive scholarly attention has been paid to various aspects of on-line language programs, the implementation of on-line English-language learning (COEL) programs in business contexts remains an unexplored area in the CALL (computer assisted language learning) literature. Moreover, while many studies have focused on learners’ first usage intentions in TAM (technical acceptance model), few have explored their intentions to continue using them. To address this lacuna, a framework of COEL in order to explore learners’ perceptions of COEL had been developed first. An examination of the proposed two models revealed gaps between learners’ intention of first usage and re-usage of the COEL. Further analyses revealed a significant difference between groups of high intention learners to re-use the COEL and low intention learners to re-use the COEL. A second investigation determined eight factors that contributed to the differences between these two diverse groups of learners. This study’s findings shed light on the relationship between TAM model and the perceived enjoyment, learners’ attitudes, intentions and overall reactions to COEL programs. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Flowerdew, L. (2003). ‘A combined corpus and Systemic Functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing’. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 489-511.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swales, J. (1997). English as Tyrannosaurus rex. World Englishes, 16, 373-382.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vollmer, H. (2001). Englisch und mehrsprachigkeit: Interkulturelles lernen durchEnglisch als lingua franca? In: D. Abendroth, Timmer and G. Bach (eds.) Mehrsprachiges Europa. Festschrift für Michael Wendt zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 91-109).Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133-158.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufmann, S. (2006). Business English: New approaches are needed to increase the ROI in corporate English learning. Published: 9/27/2006 http://www.buzzle.com/articles/business-english-new-approaches-increase-roicorporate-learning.html. Uploaded 6 June, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2006b, June). MOE Foreign English Teachers Project for Taiwan’s Public Schools, the Republic of China (Taiwan). Press Release.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C. H. The teaching behavior differences between native and non-native English teachers in early childhood education. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Providence University, Taiwan. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. International Jl. on E-Learning, 5(4), 571-591.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ha, I. Yoon, Y. Choi, M., Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276-286.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, M.-s., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research: II. Communication Research, 20(3), 331-364.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bagozzi, R. P. Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627. 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489. 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society for Training and Development, 13(11), 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Revisiting Kirkpatrick's Four Level Model. Training and Development 50(1), 54-57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arthur, W. J., Bennett, W. J., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234-245. (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, K. G.. An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: A closer look at "smile sheets". Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 991-1001. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, K. G., & Gerhardt, M. W. Formative evaluation: An integrated practice model and case study. Personnel Psychology, 55, 951-983. 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noe, R. A. (2002). Employee training and development (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In K. Kraiger (Ed.), Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development: State-of-the-art Lessons for Practice (pp. 192-233). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander, S. E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43, 240-248. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bonk, C. J. Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.com. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mason, R., & Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173-200.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education & Training 46(6/7), 335-342.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2002). An analysis of student’s preparation for the virtual learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Selim, H. M. (2003). E-Learning critical success factors: An exploratory investigation of student perceptions. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Research Conference at the United Arab Emirates University.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Masoumi, D. (2006). Factors for effective e-learning. The e-quality final seminar Retrieved April 30, 2007, from www.e-quality-eu.org/pdf/seminar/e-Quality_WS3_DMasoumi.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  32. Féraud, G. (2005). Transferring successful corporate training into e-learning in a large international organization: The case of early warning in conflict prevention Systèmes d'Information et Management, 10(2), 89-106.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Soong, M. H. B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36, 101-120.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwab, D. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klem, L. (1995). Path analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 65-97). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business Research Methods. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-110.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luor, T., Hu, C., & Lu, H. (In press.). Mind the gap’: An empirical study of the intention and actual usage of corporate e-learning programs in the financial industry (2008), British Journal of Educational Technology. (in-press).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dringus, L. P. (1999). Resource requirements for online learning environments. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 13(4), 20-25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tainyi (Ted) Luor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luor, T., Lu, HP., Johanson, R., Wu, LL. (2009). Minding the Gap Between First and Continued Usage: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of a Corporate e-Learning English-Language Program at a Financial Firm in Taiwan. In: Chou, SY., Trappey, A., Pokojski, J., Smith, S. (eds) Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-762-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics