Skip to main content

Using DEA and GA Algorithm for Finding an Optimal Design Chain Partner Combination

  • Conference paper
Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology

Part of the book series: Advanced Concurrent Engineering ((ACENG))

Abstract

To assist enterprises in building the optimal design chain partner combination, this research focuses on the development of a weight restricted DEA model, in which appropriate design chain partners are evaluated and selected according to different partner roles, and appropriate partner sets are formed correspondingly. As product development time and costs depend closely on coordination efficiency among different design chain partner members, this study takes this factor into account by developing a multi-objective design chain partner combination evaluation and selection model. This study uses multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) to search for the optimal design chain partner combination in order to achieve the objective of minimized new product development costs and time in conjunction with maximized product reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CAO, H. Y.; WANG, D. W. A simulation based genetic algorithm for risk-based partner selection in new product development. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 16-25, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WANG, D. W.; YANG, K. L.; IP, W. H. A heuristic genetic algorithm for subcontractor selection in a global manufacturing environment. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews. IEEE Transactions on, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 189-198, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. IP, W. H.; HUANGB, M.; YUNGA, K. L.; WANG, D. W. Genetic algorithm solution for a risk-based partner selection problem in a virtual enterprise. Computers and Operations Research, vol. 30, pp. 213–231, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CHAN, F. T. S. Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 41, pp. 3549–3579, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MIKHAILOV, L. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. OMEGA – International Journal of Management Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 393–401, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WANG, J.; LIN, H. Y. A fuzzy hybrid decision-aid model for selecting partners in the design chain. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2047– 2069, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. RAM, N.; SRINIVAS, T.; DAVID, M. Supplier Evaluation and Rationalization via Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Examination. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 37, no. 3, p28–37, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WEBER, C.; CURRENT, J.; DESAI, A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 108, pp. 208–223, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CELEBI, D.; BAYRAKTAR, D. An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, pp. 1698–1710, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WEBER, C.; CURRENT, J.; DESAI, A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 108, pp. 208–223, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. TALLURI, S.; BAKER, R. A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 141, pp. 544–558, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WU, J.; LIANG, L.; YANG, F. Partner Selection in Virtual Enterprise: A DEA Approach. Asia Pacific Management Review, vol.12, pp. 223-231, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SAATY, T. L. Multi-criteria Decision Making: The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. BUCKLEY, J. J. Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, p. 233- 247, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. REGNIER, E. Activity Completion Times in PERT and Scheduling Network Simulation, DRMI Newsletter, vol. 12, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. LIKERT, R. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. New York: Archives of Psychology, vol. 140, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  17. DEB K, Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms: Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. HIRANI, H.; SUH, N. P. Journal bearing design using multi-objective genetic algorithm and axiomatic design approaches. Tribology International, Vol. 38, pp. 481- 491, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. GOLDBERG, D. E. Genetic Algorithm in search. Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzu-An Chiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chuang, CL., Chiang, TA., Che, Z., Wang, H. (2009). Using DEA and GA Algorithm for Finding an Optimal Design Chain Partner Combination. In: Chou, SY., Trappey, A., Pokojski, J., Smith, S. (eds) Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-762-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics