Skip to main content

From One to Many Boxes: Mobile Devices as Primary and Secondary Screens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

This chapter looks at the current changing habits on audiovisual content consumption at home, with special focus on potential uses of mobile devices. Standard television plus a remote control impose a use that is too coarse to support the various personal needs of people, while mobile devices open new possibilities from engagement and immersion into content and deliberately controlled disengagement with others to providing a screen that can be offered to include others in sharing experiences in a huddled setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (1988). American national standard for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations (Report No. ANSI/HFS Standard No.100–1988). Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankrum, D. R. (1996). Viewing distance at computer workstations. Work Place Ergonomics, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apteker, R. T., Fisher, A. A., Kisimov, V. S., & Neishlos, H. (1994). Distributed multimedia: User perception and dynamic QoS. In Proceedings of SPIE (pp. 226–234).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardito, M. (1994). Studies on the influence of display size and picture brightness on the preferred viewing distance for HDTV. SMPTE, Vol. 103(9), (pp. 517–522).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics 53:740–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmaier, C. (2000). Understanding digital: Advanced theory. In M. Silbergleid & M. Pescatore (Eds.), The guide to digital television. (United Entertainment Media) New York (NY), USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boff, K. R., & Lincoln, J. E. (1988). Visual acuity: Effect of viewing distance and luminance level. In Engineering Data Compendium, Human Perception and Performance. Ohio: AAMRL/Wright-Patterson AFB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, P., Vuorimaa, P., & Vierinen, J. (2006). “A Graphics Architecture for High-End Interactive Television Terminals,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 2(4):343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, P., Bulterman, D. C. A., & Jansen, J. (2009). Usages of the secondary screen in an interactive television environment: Control, enrich, and share television content. Multimedia Systems Journal 15(3):127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y., Chipchase, J. & Jung, Y. (2007). Personal TV: A qualitative study of mobile TV users, In Proceedings of EuroITV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (pp.195–204).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppens, T., Vanparijs, F. & Handekyn, K. (2005). “AmigoTV: A Social TV Experience Through Triple-Play Convergence”, Alcetel-Lucent white paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, L., Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Hill, A., & Kondo, K. (2007). Making interactive TV Easier to Use: Interface design for a second screen approach. The Design Journal, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran K, Annesley S (2005) Transcoding media for bandwidth constrained mobile devices. International Journal of Network Management 15:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearman, D., & Pierce, J. S. (2008). It’s on my other computer!: Computing with multiple devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 767–776).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamant, L. (1989). The broadcast communications dictionary. (3rd ed.). Greenwood Press. Santa Barbara (CA), USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2001). At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 256–272). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallahkhair, S., Pemberton, L., & Griffiths, R. (2005). Dual device user interface design for ubiquitous language learning: Mobile phone and interactive television (iTV). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 85–92).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D., & Hill, A. (1999). TV living: Television, culture and everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R. E., & Eldridge, M. (2001). y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In Proceedings of the seventh conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2005). Romantic drama in China soap opera only for mobile phones. Guardian Newspapers Limited, from http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/6-28-2005-72274.asp

  • Gwinn, E., & Hughlett, M. (2005). Mobile TV for your cell phone. Chicago Tribune, from http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=93423&ran=38197

  • Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. Doubleday & Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, V. (2005). Designing for interactive television: version 1.0. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R., Regan, T., & Rouncefield, M. (2008). Taking hold of TV: Learning from the literature. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design, activities, artefacts and environments (pp. 79–86).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatada T, Sakata H, Kusaka H (1980) Psychophysical analysis of the ‘sensation of reality’ induced by a visual wide-field display. SMPTE 89:560–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauske, G., Stockhammer, T., & Hofmaier, R. (2003). Subjective image quality of low-rate and low-resolution video sequences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton D, Wohl RR (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19:215–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., O’Brien, J., & Rodden, T. (1998). Understanding technology in domestic environments: Lessons for cooperative buildings. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings (CoBuild’98) (pp. 248–261). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (2005). Interactive television: New genres, new format, new content. In Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 89–96).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (2008). The concept of interactivity – revisited: Four new typologies for a new media landscape. In Proceedings of UXTV (pp. 129–132).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., & Hannuksela, M. (2008). Does context matter in quality evaluation of mobile television. In Proceedings of mobile HCI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., Kumar, V. M. V., Liinasuo, M., & Hannuksela, M. (2006). Acceptance of audiovisual quality in erroneous television sequences over a DVB-H channel. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop in Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kap, D. (2008, November 4). Americans surf internet while watching TV: Nielsen. New York Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanastasi A, Kazasis FG, Christodoulakis S (2005) A natural language model for managing TV-anytime information in mobile environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9:262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, S., Boon, C. S., Fujibayashi, A., Hangai, S., & Hamamoto, T. (2005). Perceptual quality of motion of video sequences on mobile terminals. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference (pp. 442–447).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Mobile users’ needs and expectations of future multimedia services. In Proceedings of the WWRF12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., & McCarthy, J. (2005). Design requirements for mobile TV. In Proceedings of Mobile HCI (pp. 69–76).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M. A. (2005). Can small be beautiful? Assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2005 (pp. 829–838). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M. A. (2006a). A close-up on mobile TV: The effect of low resolutions on shot types. In Proceedings of EuroITV ‘06 – beyond usability, broadcast and TV (pp. 359–367).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M. A. (2006b). Reading the fine print: The effect of text legibility on perceived video quality in mobile TV. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia (pp. 727–730).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., Papaleo, M., Sasse, M. A., & Vanelli-Coralli, A. (2007). The kindest cut: Enhancing the user experience of mobile TV through adequate zooming. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2007 (pp. 87–96). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, H., & Sasse, M. A. (2008). The sweet spot: How people trade off size and definition on mobile devices. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, I., & Repo, P. (2006). Personal technology in public places – face and mobile video (Rep. No. 94). Helsinki, Finland: National Consumer Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Lee RS (1995) How and why people watch TV: Implications for the future of interactive television. Journal of Advertising Research 35:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E., Maclean, R., & Stirling, A. (2006). Mobile TV – results from the BT Movio DAB-IP pilot in London (Rep. No. Technical Review). EBU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund AM (1993) The influence of video image size and resolution on viewing-distance preference. SMPTE 102:406–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther AC (1996) Principles of digital audio and video. Artech House Publishers, Boston, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, J. (2005). Finnish mobile TV pilot. Research International Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. (2006). Mobile TV – results from the BT Movio DAB-IP trial in Oxford EBU (Technical Review).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., Sasse, M. A., & Miras, D. (2004). Sharp or smooth? Comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video. In Proceedings of the CHI (pp. 535–542).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, G. (2001). Legibility of projected information, from www.conceptron.com/articles/pdf/legibility_of_projected_information.pdf

  • Nathan JG, Anderson DR, Field DE, Collins P (1985) Television viewing at home: Distances and visual angles of children and adults. Human Factors 27:467–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokia. (2006). Abertis telecom, Nokia and Telefonica Moviles unveil results of first digital mobile TV pilot in Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, K., Mitchell, A. S., & Vorbau, A. (2007). Consuming video on mobile devices. In Proceedings of CHI’07 (pp. 857–866). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens DA, Wolfe-Kelly K (1987) Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 28:743–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts K, Hurst N (1989) How much do people prefer widescreen (16 × 9) to standard NTSC (4 × 3)? IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 35:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repo, P., Hyvönen, K., Pantzar, M., & Timonen, P. (2004). Users inventing ways to enjoy new mobile services – the case of watching mobile videos. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., Wharton, C., Ashworth, C., & Franzke, M. (1996). Dual device user interface design: PDAs and interactive television. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79–86).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin AM (1981) An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research 9:141–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Seager, W., Knoche, H., & Sasse, M. A. (2007). TV-centricity – Requirements gathering for triple play services. In Interactive TV: A shared experience TICSP adjunct proceedings of EuroITV 2007 (pp. 274–278).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (2003). Leonardo’s laptop: Human needs and the new computing technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Södergård, C. (2003). Mobile television – technology and user experiences report on the mobile-TV project (Rep. No. P506). VTT Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S., Won, Y., & Song, I. (2004). Empirical study of user perception behavior for mobile streaming. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 327–330). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategy Analytics. (2006). TV phones: Integration and power improvements needed to reach 100 million sales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, N. E. (2004b). Results of a survey on television viewing distance (Rep. No. WHP 090). British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, N. E. (2004a). Results of a survey on television viewing distance (Rep. No. WHP 090.). British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, N. E., & Stone, M. A. (1989). HDTV displays (Rep. No. BBC RD 1989/9 PH-295). BBC Research Department, Engineering Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Harper, R. (2002). Switching on to switch off: An analysis of routine TV watching habits and their implications for electronic programme guide design. usableiTV, 1, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson FT (1957) Television line structure suppression. SMPTE 66:603–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. (1998). Grammar of the shot. Elsevier/Focal Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, S., & Dufaux, F. (2003). Video quality for mobile applications. In Proceedings of SPIE (Vol. 5150), Jun. 2003, San Jose, CA, USA (pp. 593–603).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuyama, I. (2008). Fundamental requirements for high-definition television. In High-Definition Television NHK Technical Monograph (NHK Advanced broadcasting systems research division).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillman, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–172). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Cesar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cesar, P., Knoche, H., Bulterman, D.C.A. (2010). From One to Many Boxes: Mobile Devices as Primary and Secondary Screens. In: Marcus, A., Roibás, A., Sala, R. (eds) Mobile TV: Customizing Content and Experience. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-701-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-701-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-700-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-701-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics