Skip to main content

Radiation Safety: Radiation Dosimetry and CT Dose Reduction Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cardiac CT Imaging
  • 1907 Accesses

Abstract

The ability of modern multidetector CT scanners with submillimeter resolution, subsecond rotation time, and large volume imaging has resulted in widespread utilization of cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) [1]. However, the widespread use of CCTA has also raised concerns about the radiation dose to the patients. The National Council on Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 160, reported that the radiation exposure to the United States population due to medical sources increased more than 7 times in the 20 years between 1986 and 2006 [2]. Although in 2006 CT constituted about 10% of the diagnostic examinations that utilize X-rays, it contributed to nearly 50% of the population dose [2–4]. Based on our current knowledge of radiation biology, the deleterious effects of radiation are cumulative and medical radiation is increasingly a significant contributor to the amount of radiation accumulated in a person’s lifetime [1, 2, 5]. The risk of cancer from radiation exposure is especially worrisome in children and young women who received multiple CT examinations early in their lives. For example, studies found that one CT examination of the female chest gives as much radiation as 10 mammograms to each breast [6]. Therefore, the practitioners of CT must be constantly aware of the risks of radiation and strive toward applying the lowest dose to the patient consistent with the clinical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 654-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298(3):317–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. NCRP Report No. 160. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalendar W. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications. Erlangen: Publicis Corporate; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watson SJ, Jones AL, Oatway WB, Hughes JS. Ionizing radiation exposure of the UK population: 2005 review. Health Protection Agency, Report HPA-RPD-001; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Research Council. BEIR report VII. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1228–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NCRP Report No. 82. SI Units in Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ICRP. ICRP publication 92: Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), Quality Factor (Q), and Radiation Weighting Factor (wR). Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Health Canada. 2007 Report on occupational radiation exposures in Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/occup-travail/2007-report-rapport-eng.pdf; 2007

  10. Feng YJ, Chen WR, Sun TP, Duan SY, Jia BS, Zhang HL. Estimated cosmic radiation doses for flight personnel. Space Med Med Eng. 2002;15(4):265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Transportation Report – DOT/FAA/AM-03/16. Friedberg W and Copeland K. What Aircrews Should Know About Their Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NCRP. NCRP Report No. 101. Exposure of the U.S. Population From Occupational Radiation; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ICRP. ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 1991. ISBN 0-08-041144–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation. 2003;107:917–922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AAPM. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Impact CT patient dosimetry calculator. http://www.impactscan.org/download/ctdosimetrydownload.htm. Accessed 7.08.2009.

  17. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm. Accessed 7.08.2009.

  18. Goodman TR, Brink JA. Adult CT: Controlling Dose and Image Quality. In: From Invisible to Visible – The Science and Practice of X-Ray Imaging and Radiation Dose Optimization. 2006 Categorical Course Syllabus, Radiologicqal Society of North America; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prokop M, Galanski M, eds. Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body. New York: Thieme; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340–2348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, et al. Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1045–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takakuwa KM et al. Radiation dose in a “Triple Rule-Out” coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:866–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gopal A, Budoff MJ. A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2009;132:435–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Budoff MJ, et al. Substantial radiation dose reduction in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography by using lower X-ray energy during scanning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:A148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hausleiter J et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice. Circulation. 2006;113:1305–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gopal A, et al. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:405–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26:503–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. http://www.impactscan.org/slides/ecr2005/index.htm as of 18 May 2007.

  29. Steigner ML et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai H. Lee PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, K.H. (2010). Radiation Safety: Radiation Dosimetry and CT Dose Reduction Techniques. In: Budoff, M., Shinbane, J. (eds) Cardiac CT Imaging. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-650-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-650-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-649-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-650-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics