Abstract
The ability of modern multidetector CT scanners with submillimeter resolution, subsecond rotation time, and large volume imaging has resulted in widespread utilization of cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) [1]. However, the widespread use of CCTA has also raised concerns about the radiation dose to the patients. The National Council on Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 160, reported that the radiation exposure to the United States population due to medical sources increased more than 7 times in the 20 years between 1986 and 2006 [2]. Although in 2006 CT constituted about 10% of the diagnostic examinations that utilize X-rays, it contributed to nearly 50% of the population dose [2–4]. Based on our current knowledge of radiation biology, the deleterious effects of radiation are cumulative and medical radiation is increasingly a significant contributor to the amount of radiation accumulated in a person’s lifetime [1, 2, 5]. The risk of cancer from radiation exposure is especially worrisome in children and young women who received multiple CT examinations early in their lives. For example, studies found that one CT examination of the female chest gives as much radiation as 10 mammograms to each breast [6]. Therefore, the practitioners of CT must be constantly aware of the risks of radiation and strive toward applying the lowest dose to the patient consistent with the clinical study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 654-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298(3):317–323.
NCRP Report No. 160. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States; 2009.
Kalendar W. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications. Erlangen: Publicis Corporate; 2005.
Watson SJ, Jones AL, Oatway WB, Hughes JS. Ionizing radiation exposure of the UK population: 2005 review. Health Protection Agency, Report HPA-RPD-001; 2005.
National Research Council. BEIR report VII. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1228–1233.
NCRP Report No. 82. SI Units in Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1985.
ICRP. ICRP publication 92: Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), Quality Factor (Q), and Radiation Weighting Factor (wR). Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2003.
Health Canada. 2007 Report on occupational radiation exposures in Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/occup-travail/2007-report-rapport-eng.pdf; 2007
Feng YJ, Chen WR, Sun TP, Duan SY, Jia BS, Zhang HL. Estimated cosmic radiation doses for flight personnel. Space Med Med Eng. 2002;15(4):265–269.
Department of Transportation Report – DOT/FAA/AM-03/16. Friedberg W and Copeland K. What Aircrews Should Know About Their Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation; 2003.
NCRP. NCRP Report No. 101. Exposure of the U.S. Population From Occupational Radiation; 1989.
ICRP. ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 1991. ISBN 0-08-041144–4.
Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation. 2003;107:917–922.
AAPM. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008.
Impact CT patient dosimetry calculator. http://www.impactscan.org/download/ctdosimetrydownload.htm. Accessed 7.08.2009.
European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm. Accessed 7.08.2009.
Goodman TR, Brink JA. Adult CT: Controlling Dose and Image Quality. In: From Invisible to Visible – The Science and Practice of X-Ray Imaging and Radiation Dose Optimization. 2006 Categorical Course Syllabus, Radiologicqal Society of North America; 2006.
Prokop M, Galanski M, eds. Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body. New York: Thieme; 2003.
Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340–2348.
Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, et al. Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1045–1050.
Takakuwa KM et al. Radiation dose in a “Triple Rule-Out” coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:866–872.
Gopal A, Budoff MJ. A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2009;132:435–436.
Budoff MJ, et al. Substantial radiation dose reduction in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography by using lower X-ray energy during scanning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:A148.
Hausleiter J et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice. Circulation. 2006;113:1305–1310.
Gopal A, et al. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:405–416.
McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26:503–512.
http://www.impactscan.org/slides/ecr2005/index.htm as of 18 May 2007.
Steigner ML et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:85–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, K.H. (2010). Radiation Safety: Radiation Dosimetry and CT Dose Reduction Techniques. In: Budoff, M., Shinbane, J. (eds) Cardiac CT Imaging. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-650-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-650-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-649-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-650-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)