Skip to main content

Designing a Successful Bidding Strategy Using Fuzzy Sets and Agent Attitudes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Web-based Support Systems

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

To be successful in a multi-attribute auction, agents must be capable of adapting to continuously changing bidding price. This chapter presents a novel fuzzy attitude-based bidding strategy (FA-Bid), which employs dual assessment technique, i.e., assessment of multiple attributes of the goods as well as assessment of agents’ attitude (eagerness) to procure an item in automated auction. The assessment of attributes adapts the fuzzy sets technique to handle uncertainty of the bidding process as well use heuristic rules to determine the attitude of bidding agents in simulated auctions to procure goods. The overall assessment is used to determine a price range based on current bid, which finally selects the best one as the new bid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anthony, P., N.R.Jennings: Evolving bidding strategies for multiple auctions. In: Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 187–192. Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Byde, A., Priest, C., N.R.Jennings: Decision procedures for multiple auctions. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 613–620. Bologana, Italy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence 25(4) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Combining linguistic information in a distributed intelligent agent model for information gathering on the internet. In: P. Wang (ed.) Computing with words, pp. 251–276. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L., Vila, M.A.: Aggregation of linguistic information based on a symbolic approach. In: L. Zadeh, J. Kacpryzk (eds.) Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems I. Foundations, pp. 428–440. Physica–Verlag (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3–4), 159–185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwald, A., Stone, P.: Autonomous bidding agents in the trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing pp. 52–60 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, M., Leung, H.F., Jennings, N.R.: A fuzzy-logic based bidding strategy for autonomous agents in continuous double auctions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and data Engineering 15(6), 1345–1363 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F.: Multiperson decision–making based on multiplicative preference relations. European J. Operational Research 129, 372–385 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldrige, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalcyzk, R.: On negotiation as a distributed fuzzy constraint satisfaction problem. In: Proceedings DEXA e-Negotiation Workshop, pp. 631–637 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kowalcyzk, R., Bui, V.: On fuzzy e-negotiation agents: Autonomous negotiation with incomplete and imprecise information. In: Proceedings Dexa e-Negotiation Workshop (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, X., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H., Lee, J.: A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiation in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence 148(1–2), 53–102 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo, X., Zhang, C., Jennings, N.: A hybrid model of sharing between fuzzy, uncertain and default reasoning models in multi-agent systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge Based Systems 10(4), 401–450 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, H., Leung, H.F.: An adaptive attitude bidding strategy for agents in continuous double auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 6, 383–398 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matos, N., Sierra, C.: Evolutionary computing and negotiating agents. In: Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1571, pp. 126–150. Springer-Verlag, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Anthony, N.R. Jennings: Developing a bidding agent for multiple heterogeneous auctions. ACM transactions on Internet Technology 3(3), 185–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Priest, C., Bartolini, C., I. Philips: Algorithm design for agents which participate in multiple simultaneous auctions. In: In Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce III (LNAI), pp. 139–154. Springer, Berlin, German (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Stone, Littman, M., S. Singh, M. Kearns: Attac-2000: An adaptive autonomous bidding agent. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 15, 189–206 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, NY (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18(1), 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yager, R.R.: Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 59, 125–148 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yager, R.R.: OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part B: Cybernetics 34(5), 1952–1963 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yao, J.: An introduction to web-based support systems. Journal of Intelligent Systems 17(1–3), 267–281 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal Human Computer Studies 48, 125–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ma, J., Goyal, M.L. (2010). Designing a Successful Bidding Strategy Using Fuzzy Sets and Agent Attitudes. In: Yao, J. (eds) Web-based Support Systems. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-628-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-628-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-627-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-628-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics