Abstract
The safe operation of nuclear reactors places a premium on reducing the risk of radiation exposure to workers and members of the public with the potential for adverse health effects and loss of life. To ensure safety, large financial investments are generally incurred at the design stage of the power plants. By the life quality method, the efficacy of the expenditures can be judged against the safety benefit to be gained. The approach provides a defendable basis for making such judgment through its link to the societal capacity to commit resources. Here we illustrate how to quantify the justifiable expenditures for safety measures enacted to reduce the risk of exposures to radiation through engineering safety programs and safety regulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arthur WB (1980) The economics of risks to life. Am Econ Rev 71(1):54–64
Bleichrodt H, Wakker P, Johannesson M (1997) Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J Risk Uncert, 15:107–114
Canada (1995) Government of Canada Regulatory Policy, Treasury Board Secretariat, November, pp1–2
Cohen BL (1991) Catalog of risks extended and updated. Health Phys 61(3):317–335
Conley BC (1976) The value of human life in demand for safety. Am Econ Rev 66(1):45–55
Fraser PM (1988) A review of the design related aspects of the safety of Ontario Hydro’s nuclear generating stations. Ontario Nuc Saf Rev, 2 (App):2.1–2.154, Toronto
Hicks JR (1939) The foundation of welfare economics. Econ J 49(196): 696–712
Keyfitz N (1985) Applied mathematical demography. Springer-Verlag, New York
Krupnick AJ, Alberini A, Cropper M et al (2000) Age, health and willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction. Discussion paper, Resources for Future DP00-37. Washington
National Academy of Sciences (1990) Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation (BEIR V). National Academy Press, Washington
Lutter R, Morrall JF, Viscusi WK (1999) The cost-per-life-saved cutoff for safety-enhancing regulations. Econ Inq, 37(4):599–608
O’Donnell EP, Mauro JJ (1979) A cost benefit analysis of nuclear safety and nonnuclear health and safety protective measures and regulations. J Nucl Saf 20(5): 525–540
Ontario Hydro (1987) Darlington NGS probabilistic safety evaluation: Summary report. Nuclear Safety and Studies Department. Ontario Hydro, Toronto
Ontario Hydro (1988a) The safety of Ontario’s nuclear power reactors: A scientific and technical review. In: Chapter 17 – Costs of nuclear safety vol. 1, Ontario Nuclear Safety Review, Toronto
Ontario Hydro (1988b) The safety of Ontario’s nuclear power reactors: A scientific and technical review. In: Section 1 Management of nuclear safety in Ontario Hydro, vol.1. Ontario Nuclear Safety Review, Toronto
Pandey MD, Nathwani JS (2003) A conceptual approach to the estimation of societal willingness-to-pay for nuclear safety programs. Nucl Eng Des 224:65–77
Pauly MV (1996) Valuing health care benefits in money terms. In: Sloan FA (ed) Valuing health care: costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies 99–124. Cambridge University Press, UK
Pliskin JS, Shepard DS and Weinstein MC (1979) Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Research, 206–224
Royal Society of Canada (2001) Report of an expert panel to review the socio-economic models and related components supporting the development of Canada Wide Standards for Particulate Matter and Ozone. Royal Society of Canada Ottawa
Shephard DS, Zechhauser RJ (1984) Survival vs. consumption. Man Sci 30(4):423–439
Skinner J (1985) Variable life span and the intertermporal elasticity of consumption. Rev Econ Stat 67(4):616–23
Statistics Canada (1995) Life tables, Canada and provinces, 1990–1992. Catalogue 84–537, Ottawa
Tengs TO et al (1995) Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Int J Risk Anal 15(3):369–390
Usher D (1973) An imputation to the measure of economic growth for changes in life expectancy. In: (1994) National accounting and economic theory: the collected papers of Dan User 1:105–144. Edward Elgar Publ, UK
Viscusi WK (1996) Discounting health effects for medical decision. In: Sloan FA (ed) Valuing Health Care: Costs, benefits, and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and other Medical Technologies 125–147. Cambridge University Press, UK
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Nuclear Safety. In: Engineering Decisions for Life Quality. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-602-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-602-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-601-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-602-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)