Skip to main content

Peter Checkland

  • Chapter
Systems Thinkers
  • 3504 Accesses

Peter Bernard Checkland has had a huge influence on systems thinking, especially in the fields of management and information systems, although his ideas have been taken up in a wide range of fields. He is most notable for the development of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), deriving from an action research programme lasting more than 30 years. As well as methodological innovations, Checkland introduced a number of key conceptual developments, in particular his distinction between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ systems thinking, and his championing of the soft approach. As Mingers (2000, p. 747) notes, “SSM has reoriented an entire discipline and touched the lives of literally thousands of people … [soft] thinking is now completely taken for granted within the systems discipline”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Checkland, P.B. (1980). The systems movement and the ‘Failure’ of ‘Management Science’. Cybernetics and Systems, 11(4), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s'. Journal of the Operational Research Society 36(9), 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Holwell, S. E. (1998a). Information, systems and information systems – making sense of the field. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B., & Holwell, S.E. (1998b). Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B. (2000a). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S11–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B. (2000b). New maps of knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S59–S75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers, and students. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. (2000). A brief review of Peter B. Checkland's contribution to systemic thinking. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(6), 723–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2000). An idea ahead of its time: The history and development of Soft Systems Methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(6), 733–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. (2000). The relevance of soft systems thinking. Human Resource Development International, 3(3), 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 of Springer Science+Business Media

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramage, M., Shipp, K. (2009). Peter Checkland. In: Systems Thinkers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-525-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-525-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-524-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-525-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics