Techniques for Event and Feature Detection

  • Jason NgEmail author
  • Jeffrey J. Goldberger


Event and feature detection are important aspects of signal processing in cardiology. Knowledge of the rate and rhythm of the heart are critical aspects of patient monitoring. Even within a single beat, the different phases of the cardiac cycle provide important information of the physiology. Although this information could be gleaned manually from the electrocardiogram, continuous blood pressure, or respiratory signals, having automatic calculations of the rates, rhythms, and amplitudes of these different signals nearly instantaneously saves precious time that could be used to save a patient’s life. These real-time measurements are often also linked to visual or audio alarms that alert hospital staff when something is going wrong. Cardiac gating for image acquisition requires accurate identification of electrocardiographic features. Automatic event and feature detection is also useful in off-line analysis and in automated analysis for cardiac imaging (i.e., determining the heart’s boundaries). This chapter will discuss common signal processing techniques that are used for event and feature detection.


Event Detection Feature Detection Template Match Matched Filter Instantaneous Slope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32(3):230-236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spach MS, Barr RC, Serwer GS, Kootscy JM, Johnson EA. Extracellular potentials related to intracellular action potentials in the dog Purkinje system. Circ Res. 1972;30:505–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLaughlin NB, Campbell RW, Murray A. Comparison of automatic QT measurement techniques in the normal 12 lead electrocardiogram. Br Heart J. 1995;74(1):84–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xue Q, Reddy S. Algorithms for computerized QT analysis. J Electrocardiol. 1998;30 suppl:181–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations