Abstract
Dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) has a diminishing but specific role as a method of reconstruction in selected patients presenting with incontinence. DGP is designed to restore fecal continence through the transposition of an autologous muscle capable of contracting either voluntarily or by electrical stimulation. Although it is evident that the inherent properties of the gracilis muscle are not optimal for the provision of continence, its supplementation with an implanted electrical stimulator provides more long-term, “automated” contraction. This dynamization of the gracilis muscle results in a specific conditioning of the muscle fibers from rapid twitch, easily fatigable (type II) fibers to tonic, slow contracting (type I) fibers to suit this purpose. This chapter describes the specialist approach to the failing DGP, which results from problems with the muscle or the dynamization process. There is a high rate of complications and revisions among patients implanted with a DGP, including infection, hardware failure, and postoperative evacuatory dysfunction. Specific complications include lead fibrosis, thigh seroma, stimulator erosion and exposure, fecal impaction, anal fissure formation, stimulator rotation, premature battery discharge, lead fracture, perineural fibrosis, and electrode displacement. The DGP may have a specific place in total anorectal reconstruction after abdomino-perineal resection and as a supplement in patients who were treated during childhood for congenital anorectal anomalies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM, Heineman E, Konsten J, Engel GL, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1600–5.
Salmons S, Henriksson J. The adaptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve. 1981;4:94–105.
Baeten CGMI, Rongen MJ. Managing functional problems following dynamic graciloplasty. In: Wexner SD, Zbar A, Pescatori M, editors. Complex anorectal disorders: investigation and management. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 706–14.
Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Ruis J, Teoh TA, Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, et al. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation. Initial experience, pitfalls and complications. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:957–64.
Cera SM, Wexner SD. Muscle transposition: does it still have a role? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005;18:46–54.
Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CG, Buie WD, Christiansen J, Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group, et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management and impact of outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1427–35.
Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:912–7.
Lanmuller H, Bijak M, Mayr W, Rafolt D, Sauermann S, Thoma H. Useful applications and limits of battery powered implants in functional electrical stimulations. Artif Organs. 1997;21:210–2.
Koch SM, Uludağ O, El Naggar K, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:195–200.
Michot F, Lefebure B, Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Kianifard B, Leroi AM, et al. Artificial anal sphincter for severe fecal incontinence implanted by a transvaginal approach: experience with 32 patients treated at one institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1155–60.
Melenhorst J, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. The artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: a single centre study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:107–11.
Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G. Neosphincter and neostomy [new surgical techniques as a function of the prospects of electrostimulation for continence. Clinical experience. Preliminary reports]. Minerva Chir. 1981;36:389–92.
Geerdes B, Konsten J, Baeten CG. Bilateral gracilis neosphincter construction for treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1015–6.
Edden Y, Wexner SD. Therapeutic devices for fecal incontinence: dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter and sacral nerve stimulation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6:307–12.
Konsten J, Rongen MJ, Ogunbiyi OA, Darakhshan A, Baeten CG, Williams NS. Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:581–6.
Ho KS, Seow-Choen F. Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:38–41.
Baeten CG, Konsten J, Heineman E, Soeters PB. Dynamic graciloplasty for anal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:922–5.
Koch SM, Uludağ O, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG, van Gemert W. Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1711–9.
Adang EMM, Engel GL, Rutten FH, Geerdes BP, Baeten CG. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:725–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baeten, C.G.M.I., Breukink, S.O. (2013). Failed Dynamic Graciloplasty. In: Zbar, A., Madoff, R., Wexner, S. (eds) Reconstructive Surgery of the Rectum, Anus and Perineum. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-412-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-413-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)