Skip to main content

Failed Dynamic Graciloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reconstructive Surgery of the Rectum, Anus and Perineum

Abstract

Dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) has a diminishing but specific role as a method of reconstruction in selected patients presenting with incontinence. DGP is designed to restore fecal continence through the transposition of an autologous muscle capable of contracting either voluntarily or by electrical stimulation. Although it is evident that the inherent properties of the gracilis muscle are not optimal for the provision of continence, its supplementation with an implanted electrical stimulator provides more long-term, “automated” contraction. This dynamization of the gracilis muscle results in a specific conditioning of the muscle fibers from rapid twitch, easily fatigable (type II) fibers to tonic, slow contracting (type I) fibers to suit this purpose. This chapter describes the specialist approach to the failing DGP, which results from problems with the muscle or the dynamization process. There is a high rate of complications and revisions among patients implanted with a DGP, including infection, hardware failure, and postoperative evacuatory dysfunction. Specific complications include lead fibrosis, thigh seroma, stimulator erosion and exposure, fecal impaction, anal fissure formation, stimulator rotation, premature battery discharge, lead fracture, perineural fibrosis, and electrode displacement. The DGP may have a specific place in total anorectal reconstruction after abdomino-perineal resection and as a supplement in patients who were treated during childhood for congenital anorectal anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM, Heineman E, Konsten J, Engel GL, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salmons S, Henriksson J. The adaptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve. 1981;4:94–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baeten CGMI, Rongen MJ. Managing functional problems following dynamic graciloplasty. In: Wexner SD, Zbar A, Pescatori M, editors. Complex anorectal disorders: investigation and management. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 706–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Ruis J, Teoh TA, Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, et al. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation. Initial experience, pitfalls and complications. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:957–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cera SM, Wexner SD. Muscle transposition: does it still have a role? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005;18:46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CG, Buie WD, Christiansen J, Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group, et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management and impact of outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1427–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:912–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lanmuller H, Bijak M, Mayr W, Rafolt D, Sauermann S, Thoma H. Useful applications and limits of battery powered implants in functional electrical stimulations. Artif Organs. 1997;21:210–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koch SM, Uludağ O, El Naggar K, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michot F, Lefebure B, Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Kianifard B, Leroi AM, et al. Artificial anal sphincter for severe fecal incontinence implanted by a transvaginal approach: experience with 32 patients treated at one institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1155–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. The artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: a single centre study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G. Neosphincter and neostomy [new surgical techniques as a function of the prospects of electrostimulation for continence. Clinical experience. Preliminary reports]. Minerva Chir. 1981;36:389–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geerdes B, Konsten J, Baeten CG. Bilateral gracilis neosphincter construction for treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1015–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edden Y, Wexner SD. Therapeutic devices for fecal incontinence: dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter and sacral nerve stimulation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6:307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Konsten J, Rongen MJ, Ogunbiyi OA, Darakhshan A, Baeten CG, Williams NS. Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:581–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho KS, Seow-Choen F. Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:38–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baeten CG, Konsten J, Heineman E, Soeters PB. Dynamic graciloplasty for anal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:922–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch SM, Uludağ O, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG, van Gemert W. Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1711–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adang EMM, Engel GL, Rutten FH, Geerdes BP, Baeten CG. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:725–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelius G. M. I. Baeten M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baeten, C.G.M.I., Breukink, S.O. (2013). Failed Dynamic Graciloplasty. In: Zbar, A., Madoff, R., Wexner, S. (eds) Reconstructive Surgery of the Rectum, Anus and Perineum. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-412-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-413-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics