Skip to main content

Rectocele and Rectoenterocele: The Gynecologist’s Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reconstructive Surgery of the Rectum, Anus and Perineum

Abstract

Rectocele and rectoenterocele commonly cause a vaginal bulge and therefore often are seen and treated by a gynecologist, even if they frequently cause symptoms belonging to the realm of the gastroenterologist and the colorectal surgeon. Because of our limited understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology, and even basic anatomy of rectocele and rectoenterocele, there is disagreement within and between specialties about the best surgical means of treating these conditions, and little information regarding functional and anatomical outcomes is available. This chapter examines what is known about the etiology and pathophysiology of rectocele and rectoenterocele, describes recent advances in functional imaging, and outlines the approaches used by gynecologists in the surgical management of these conditions. Understanding the gynecological approach will assist the coloproctologist to whom such patients are referred after gynecological surgery or who is part of a multidisciplinary management team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richter K, Albrich W. Long-term results following fixation of the vagina on the sacrospinal ligament by the vaginal route (vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:811–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miyazaki FS. Miya Hook ligature carrier for sacrospinous ligament suspension. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:286–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim D, Ghoniem G. The abdominal approach to urogenital prolapse. In: Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Bartram C, editors. Pelvic floor disorders. Milan: Springer Italia; 2010. p. 457–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;36:976–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey J, Shobeiri SA. State of the art pelvic floor anatomy. In: Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Bartram CI, editors. Pelvic floor disorders. Milan: Springer Italia; 2010. p. 3–15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva W, Karram M. Rectocele- anatomic and functional repair. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. London: Informa Healthcare; 2006. p. 1036–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jung S, Pretorius D, Padda B, Weinstein M, Nager C, den Boer D, et al. Vaginal high-pressure zone assessed by dynamic 3-­dimensional ultrasound images of the pelvic floor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:52.e51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bignardi T, Condous G. Sonorectovaginography: a new sonographic technique for imaging of the posterior compartment of the pelvis. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1479–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz HP. Can the rectovaginal septum be visualised by transvaginal 3D ultrasound? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(3):348–52. doi:10.1002/uog.8896. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Milley P, Nichols D. A correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec. 1969;163:443–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leffler KS, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Buller JL, Burrows LJ, Schon Ybarra MA. Attachment of the rectovaginal septum to the pelvic sidewall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:41–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz H, Clarke B. The prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:391–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP, Steensma AB. The role of childbirth in the etiology of rectocele. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:264–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz H, De Leon J, Shek K. Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:676–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz H, Simpson J. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:979–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baessler K, Schuessler B. Enterocele. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. London: Informa Healthcare; 2006. p. 1023–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz HP, Korda A. Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:505–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three- dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:73–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burrows L, Sewell C, Leffler K, Cundiff GW. The accuracy of clinical evaluation of posterior vaginal wall defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:160–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:96–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dietz H. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: part 1: 2D aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, Mellgren A, Sultan A, Shobeiri SA, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. doi:10.1002/uog.8816.

  24. Creighton SM, Pearce JM, Stanton SL. Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:310–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:511–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, Lurie Y, Malnick S, Bass D, et al. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perniola G, Shek K, Chong C, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz H. Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:567–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steensma AB, Oom DMJ, Burger C, Schouten W. Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:533–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dietz H. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: 3D aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:615–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dietz HP. The elephant’s other bits. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:285–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:399–404, discussion 404–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietz HP, Wilson PD. Colposuspension success and failure: a long-term objective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000;11:346–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dietz H. Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms of obstructed defecation? Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:265–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gustilo-Ashby A, Paraiso M, Jelovsek J, Walters M, Barber M. Bowel symptoms 1 year after surgery for prolapse: further analysis of a randomized trial of rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:76e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nichols DH, Randall CL. Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. In: Nichols DH, Randall CL, editors. Vaginal surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 257–89.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kahn MA, Stanton SL, Kumar D, Fox SD. Posterior colporrhaphy is superior to the transanal repair for treatment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18:329–30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse and its management. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;9:303–10.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function [see comments]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Qatawneh AM, Maher CF, Schluter PL. Posterior colporrhaphy for rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;13:S38.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Richardson AC. The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg. 1996;1:214–21.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raz S, Nitti VW, Bregg KJ. Transvaginal repair of enterocele. J Urol. 1993;149:724–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Maher CF, Murray CJ, Carey MP, Dwyer PL, Ugoni AM. Iliococcygeus or sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:40–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Feiner B, Jelovsek J, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:15–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Petros P. Total pelvic floor reconstruction. In: Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Bartram C, editors. Pelvic floor disorders. Milan: Springer Italia; 2010. p. 485–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Farid M, Madbouly K, Hussein A, Mahdy T, Moneim H, Omar W. Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J Surg. 2010;34:822–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Paraiso M, Barber M, Muir T, Walters M. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1762–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand PK. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:314–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1451–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Singh K, Cortes E, Reid W. Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Porter W, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram M. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Glavind K, Madsen H. A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:145–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1360–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD004014;PMID: 17636742.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dietz H, Shek K, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:580–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr Dietz has, within the last two calendar years, acted as a consultant for Materna Inc (San Francisco, CA) and has received an educational grant from General Electric Medical (Waukesha, WI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Peter Dietz M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dietz, H.P. (2013). Rectocele and Rectoenterocele: The Gynecologist’s Approach. In: Zbar, A., Madoff, R., Wexner, S. (eds) Reconstructive Surgery of the Rectum, Anus and Perineum. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-413-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-412-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-413-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics