Advertisement

Simulation of Maintained Multicomponent Systems for Dependability Assessment

  • Valérie Zille
  • Christophe Bérenguer
  • Antoine Grall
  • Antoine Despujols
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

In this chapter, we propose a modeling approach of both degradation and failure processes and themaintenance strategy applied on a multicomponent system. In particular, we describe the method implementation using stochastic synchronized Petri nets and Monte Carlo simulation. The structured and modular model developed allows consideration of dependences between system components due either to failures or to operating and environmental conditions. Maintenance activity effectiveness is also modeled to represent the ability of preventive actions to detect component degradation, and the ability of both preventive and corrective actions to modify and keep under control degradation mechanism evolution in order to avoid occurrence of a failure. The results obtained from part of a nuclear power plant are presented to underline specificities of the method.

Keywords

Preventive Maintenance Maintenance Task Degradation Level Input Place External Inspection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alla H, David R (1998) Continuous and hybrid Petri nets. J Circuits Syst Comput 8:159–188CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Barros A, Bérenguer C, Grall A (2006) A maintenance policy for two-unit parallel systems based on imperfect monitoring information. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(2):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bérenguer C, Châtelet E, Langeron Y et al. (2004) Modeling and simulation of maintenance strategies using stochastic Petri nets. In: MMR 2004 proceedings, Santa FeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogdanoff JL, Kozin F (1985) Probabilistic models of cumulative damage. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown M, Proschan F (1983) Imperfect repair. J Appl Probab 20:851–859zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho DI, Parlar M (1991) A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems. Eur J Oper Res 51(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekker R (1996) Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 51(3):229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimesh Kumar U, Crocker J, Knezevic J et al. (2000) Reliability, maintenance and logistic support – a life cycle approach. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubi A (2000) Monte Carlo applications in systems engineering. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutuit Y (1999) Petri nets for reliability (in the field of engineering and dependability). LiLoLe Verlag, HagenGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutuit Y, Châtelet E, Signoret JP et al. (1997) Dependability modeling and evaluation by using stochastic Petri nets: application to two test cases. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 55:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grall A, Dieulle L, Bérenguer C et al. (2002) Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans Reliab 51:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jardine AKS, Joseph T, Banjevic D (1999) Optimizing condition-based maintenance decisions for equipment subject to vibration monitoring. J Qual Maint Eng 5:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leroy A, Signoret JP (1989) Use of Petri nets in availability studies. In: Reliability 89 proceedings, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindeman C (1998) Performance modeling with deterministic and stochastic Petri nets. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Malhotra M, Trivesi KS (1995) Dependability modeling using Petri nets. IEEE Trans Reliab 44(3):428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marseguerra M, Zio E (2000) Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 68(1):69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martorell S, Sanchez A, Serradell V (1999) Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 64(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martorell S, Villanueva JF, Carlos S et al. (2005) RAMS+C informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87(1):65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ozekici S (1996) Reliability and maintenance of complex systems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Pérez-Ocón R, Montor-Cazorla D (2006) A multiple warm standby system with operational and repair times following phase-type distributions. Eur J Oper Res 169(1):78–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rausand M (1998) Reliability centered maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 60:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rausand M, Hoyland A (2004) System reliability theory – models, statistical methods and applications. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Simeu-Abazi Z, Sassine C (1999) Maintenance integration in manufacturing systems by using stochastic Petri nets. Int J Prod Res 37(17):3927–3940zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas LC (1986) A survey of maintenance and replacement models for maintainability and reliability of multi-item systems. Reliab Eng 16:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Valdez-Flores C, Feldman RM (1989) A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Naval Res Logist Quart 36:419–446zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang H (2002) A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. European Journal of Oper Res 139(3):469–489zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zille V, Bérenguer C, Grall A et al. (2008) Multi-component systems modeling for quantifying complex maintenance strategies. In: ESREL 2008 proceedings, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  29. Zio E (2009) Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valérie Zille
    • 1
  • Christophe Bérenguer
    • 1
  • Antoine Grall
    • 1
  • Antoine Despujols
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Technology of TroyesTroyesFrance
  2. 2.R&DElectricité de France (EDF)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations