Advertisement

The Ipsilateral Approach for Right PVE with or Without Segment 4

  • David C. MadoffEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is now considered the standard of care to improve the safety for patients undergoing major hepatectomy with an anticipated small future liver remnant (FLR). PVE can induce contralateral liver hypertrophy in preparation for major liver resection and can be performed with various approaches. Which approach is chosen may be dependent on operator preference and on the type and extent of the subsequent resection. This chapter describes the transhepatic ipsilateral approach, an approach whereby access to the portal system is via the liver to be resected. The advantages and disadvantages of this approach will also be discussed.

Keywords

Embolization Future liver remnant Liver hypertrophy Liver resection Portal vein 

References

  1. 1.
    Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization in preparation for major hepatic resection: evolution of a new standard of care. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:779-790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Kanai M. Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach. Radiology. 1996;200:559-563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Abdalla EK, Morris JS, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and coils in preparation for major liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: safety and effectiveness–study in 26 patients. Radiology. 2003;227:251-260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, Gupta S, et al. Transhepatic ipsilateral right portal vein embolization extended to segment IV: improving hypertrophy and resection outcomes with spherical particles and coils. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:215-225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibo M, Unten S, Yogi A, et al. Percutaneous ipsilateral portal vein embolization using a modified four-lumen balloon catheter with fibrin glue: initial clinical experience. Radiat Med. 2007;25:164-172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsuda M, Kurihara N, Saito H, et al. Ipsilateral percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization with gelatin sponge particles and coils in preparation for extended right hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:989-994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kodama Y, Shimizu T, Endo H, Miyamoto N, Miyasaka K. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:1233-1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN, et al. Transhepatic portal vein embolization: anatomy, indications, and technical considerations. Radiographics. 2002;22:1063-1076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Gulik TM, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, et al. Controversies in the use of portal vein embolization. Dig Surg. 2008;25:436-444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capussotti L, Muratore A, Ferrero A, Anselmetti GC, Corgnier A, Regge D. Extension of right portal vein embolization to segment IV portal branches. Arch Surg. 2005;40:1100-1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Baere T, Roche A, Vavasseur D, et al. Portal vein embolization: utility for inducing left hepatic lobe hypertrophy before surgery. Radiology. 1993;188:73-77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Right or left trisegment portal vein embolization before hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma. Surgery. 1995;117:677-681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagino M, Kamiya J, Kanai M, et al. Right trisegment portal vein embolization for biliary tract carcinoma: technique and clinical utility. Surgery. 2000;127:155-160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kishi Y, Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, et al. Is embolization of segment 4 portal veins before extended right hepatectomy justified? Surgery. 2008;144:744-751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broering DC, Hillert C, Krupski G, et al. Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:905-913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mueller L, Hillert C, Möller L, Krupski-Berdien G, Rogiers X, Broering DC. Major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: Is preoperative portal occlusion an oncological risk factor? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1908-1917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ribero D, Abdalla EK, Madoff DC, Donadon M, Loyer EM, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy and its effects on regeneration, resectability and outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1386-1394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Graaf W, van den Esschert JW, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM. Induction of tumor growth after preoperative portal vein embolization: Is it a real problem? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:423-430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elias D, De Baere T, Roche A, Ducreux M, Leclere J, Lasser P. During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Br J Surg. 1999;86:784-788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M, et al. Proliferative activity of intrahepatic colorectal metastases after preoperative hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Hepatology. 2001;34:267-272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of RadiologyNew York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations