Skip to main content

Difficulties in Urologic Laparoscopy Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 738 Accesses

Abstract

Urologic laparoscopy has entered the mainstream in the modern urologist’s armamentarium. Minimally invasive techniques aim to reproduce the results of open surgery with lower morbidity, less postoperative pain, and shorter convalescence.1 Laparoscopic surgery has many advantages, but its somewhat more restricted environment requires a specialized skill set, specific troubleshooting, and unique potential complications. The degree of complexity of the surgical procedure and the experience of the surgeon significantly influence complication rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cadeddu J. Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparocopy. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2109-2111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1, 311 procedures at a single center. J Urol. 2002;168(1):23-26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abreu SC, Sharp DS, Ramani AP, et al. Thoracic complications during urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1451-1455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castillo O, Cortés O. Complicaciones en cirugía laparoscópica urológica. Actas Urol Esp. 2006;30(5):541-554.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Porter JR. Vascular complications during urologic laparoscopy. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2006:901-910.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Venkatesh R, Landman J. Laparoscopic complications: gastrointestinal. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2006:911-922.

    Google Scholar 

  7. French DB, Marcovich R. Laparoscopic complications: neuromuscular. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2006:923-932.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abreu SC, Cerqueira JBG, Fonseca GN. Complications: Thoracic. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2006:933-938.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandler JC, Corson SL, Way WL. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:478-491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Free T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2, 407 procedures at 4 german centers. J Urol. 1999;162:765-771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, et al. Complications of 2, 775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol. 2007;177:580-585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soulié M, Salomon L, Seguin P, et al. Multi-institutional of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology. 2001;58(6):899-903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf S Jr, Marcovich R, Gill IS, et al. Survey of neuromuscular injuries to the patient and surgeon during urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 2000;55(6):831-836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Santinelli F, Carracedo M. Trucos y secretos cirugia laparoscopica en urologia. In: Sotelo R, Castillo O, Mirandolino M, Santinelli F, eds. Lumboscopia: tecnica y secretos para su realizacion. Venezuela: La Galaxia; 2006:59-70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gill IS, Clayman RV, Albala DM, et al. Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology. 1998;52:566-571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meraney A, Samee A, Gill IS. Vascular and bowel complications during retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 2002;168:1941-1944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demey A, de la Taille A, Vordos D, et al. Complications of retroperitoneal laparoscopy based on a series of 500 cases. Prog Urol. 2006;16(2):128-133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liapis D, de la Taille A, Ploussard G, et al. Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):523-530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar M, Kumar R, Hemal AK, Gupta NP. Complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgery at one centre. BJU Int. 2001;87:607-612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hemal AK, Gupta NP, Wadhwa SN, Goel A, Kumar R. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single center experience. Urology. 2001;57(4):644-649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemal AK, Goel A, Kumar M. Evaluation of laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery in urinary stone disease. J Endourol. 2001;15(7):701-705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Winfield HN, Hamilton BD, Bravo EL, Novick AC. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the preferred choice? A comparison to open adrenalectomy. J Urol. 1998;160(2):325-329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hazzan D, Shiloni E, Golijanin D, Jurim O, Reissman P. Laparoscopic vs. open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasm. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(11):1356-1358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gill IS. The case for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol. 2001;166:429-436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Soulié M, Seguin P, Richeux L, et al. Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: experience with 350 procedures at a single center. J Urol. 2001;165:1960-1963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Terachi T, Yoshida O, Matsuda T, et al. Complications of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies in 370 cases in Japan: a multi-institutional study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2000;54(Suppl 1):211s-214s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Castillo O, Cortés O, Kerkebe M, Arellano L, Russo M, Pinto I. Adrenalectomía laparoscópica: lecciones aprendidas en 110 procedimientos consecutivos. Rev Chil Cir. 2006;58(3):175-180.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doumas K, Skrepetis K, Lykourinas M. Laparoscopic ablation of symptomatic peripelvic renal cysts. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):45-48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rané A. Laparoscopic management of symptomatic simple renal cysts. Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(1):5-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubinstein SC, Hulbert JC, Pharand D, Schuessler WW, Vancaille TG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic ablation of symptomatic renal cysts. J Urol. 1993;150:1103-1106.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim IY, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: current status. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa; 2006:493-498.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Siqueira TM Jr, Kuo RL, Gardner TH, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol. 2002;168:1361-1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional revew. J Urol. 1995;154:479-483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, Jarrett TW, Pinto PA, Kavoussi LR. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five years analysis. Urology. 2004;63:27-32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spaliviero M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current status. In: Gill IS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2006:519-542.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;173(1):42-47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Celia A, Zeccolini G, Guazzoni G, et al. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: a multi-institutional European survey of 592 cases. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2008;80(3):85-91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. J Urol. 2008;180(4):1279-1283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, Thiruchelvam N, Jones A. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2004;172:2308-2311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int. 2005;95(2):102-105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Graziottin TM, Morales CM, Goldraich IH. Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia – a six-year experience. Eur Urol. 2006;49:127-132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sotelo R, Spaliviero M, Garcia-Sergi A, et al. Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173:757-760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol. 2003;169:1689-1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1, 000 cases. J Urol. 2001;166:1729-1733.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Benoit RM, Naslund MJ, Cohen JK. Complications after radical retropubic prostatectomy in the Medicare population. Urology. 2000;56:116-120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol. 2003;43:113-118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moinzadeh A, Abouassaly R, Gill IS, Libertino JA. Continuous needle vented Foley catheter suction for urinary leak after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:2366-2367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175:541-546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hemal AK, Kumar R, Seth A, Gupta NP. Complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy during the initial experience. Int J Urol. 2004;11(7):483-488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2005;174:1231-1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Denewer A, Kotb S, Hussein O, El-Maadawy M. Laparoscopic assisted cystectomy and lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: initial experience. World J Surg. 1999;23:608-611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chiong E, Hegarty PK, Davis JW, Kamat MW, Pisters LL, Matin SF. Port-site hernias occurring after the use of bladeless expanding trocars. Urology. 2010;75(3):574-580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene J. Sotelo Noguera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noguera, R.J.S., Cuevas, C.A.G., Moncaleano, G.F., Canes, D. (2011). Difficulties in Urologic Laparoscopy Complications. In: Al-Kandari, A., Gill, I. (eds) Difficult conditions in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-105-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-105-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-104-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-105-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics