Skip to main content

The Evidence for Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and STARR

  • Chapter
  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Few areas of coloproctology attract as much attention or inspire so much heated debate than that of the treatment of hemorrhoids. Opinion varies widely and is frequently based on personal preference rather than a critical analysis of the literature. In this chapter an extensive review of the current literature on stapled hemorrhoidopexy and STARR is presented together with an overview of the current evidence level and grade of recommendation for both procedures. The reader is invited to assimilate the information provided and to come to an independent opinion on the relative merits of PPH and STARR, based on the best available scientific evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Koblandin SN and Schalkow JL. (1981) “Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers”. Kasachstan: Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes, pp 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allegra G. (1990) [Experiences with mechanical staplers: hemorrhoidectomy using a circular stapler]. G. Chir. 11:95–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Longo A. (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoid disease by reduction of mucosa an haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi Publishing Co, pp 777–784.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. (2004) Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoid-ectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis. 6:37–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, et al. (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am. J. Surg. 182:64–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, et al. (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemor-rhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis. 3:175–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:491–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung CC, Cheung HY, Chan ES, Kwok SY, et al. (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 48:1213–1219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, et al. (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:1367–1374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, et al. (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 88:669–674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Helmy MA. (2000) Stapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 30:951–958.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch. Surg. 137:337–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho KS and Ho YH. (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech. Coloproctol. 10:193–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, et al. (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy — cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis. Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemor-rhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:93–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, et al. (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum 48:1517–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, de Miguel M. (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis. Colon Rectum 48:809–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, et al. (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J. Surg. 27:203–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, Patsas A, et al. (2002) Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 17:50–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, et al. (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 19:239–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, et al. (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hem-orrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shalaby R and Desoky A. (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan—Morgan haemor-rhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 88:1049–1053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, et al. (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL, et al. (2002) A systematic review of stapled hem-orrhoidectomy. Arch. Surg. 137:1395–1406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, et al. (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ooi BS, Ho YH, Tang CL, Eu KW, et al. (2002) Results of stapling and conventional hemorrhoidec-tomy. Tech. Coloproctol. 6:59–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A. (2006) Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 21:668–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krska Z, Kvasnieka J, Faltyn J, Schmidt D, et al. (2003) Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids according to Longo and Milligan—Morgan: an evaluation of postoperative tissue response. Colorectal Dis. 5:573–576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lau PY, Meng WC, Yip AW. (2004) Stapled haem-orrhoidectomy in Chinese patients: a prospective randomised control study. Hong Kong Med. J. 10:373–377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R, Malik VK. (2005) Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy. Am. J. Surg. 189:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, et al. (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg. Endosc. 19:235–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, et al. (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan— Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann. Surg. 242:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, et al. (2004) [Haemorrhoidectomy: conventional excision versus resection with the circular stapler. Prospective, randomized study]. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 129:1611–1617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ong CH, Chee Boon FE, Keng V. (2005) Ambulatory circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus circular stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy under regional anaesthesia. ANZ J. Surg. 75:184–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt MP, Fischbein J, Shatavi H. (2002) [Stapler hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional procedures — a clinical study]. Zentralbl. Chir. 127:15–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson DB, DiSiena MR, Fanelli RD. (2003) Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly. Surg. Endosc. 17:1990–1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lomanto D and Katara AN. (2007) Stapled haemor-rhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience. Asian J. Surg. 30:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nahas SC, Borba MR, Brochado MC, Marques CF, et al. (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Arq. Gastroenterol. 40:35–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Morales-Olivera JM, Velasco L, Bada-Yllan O, Vergara-Fernandez O, et al. (2007) [First experience in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using the PPH stapler]. Rev. Invest. Clin. 59:108–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ng KH, Eu KW, Ooi BS, Heah SM, et al. (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed piles performed with concurrent perianal conditions. Tech. Coloproctol. 7:214–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, et al. (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br. J. Surg. 93:226–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohana G, Myslovaty B, Ariche A, Dreznik Z, et al. (2007) Mid-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids — correlation with the histological features of the resected tissue. World J. Surg. 31:1336–1342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Papillon M, Arnaud JP, Descottes B, Gravie JF, et al. (1999) [Treatment of hemorrhoids with the Longo technique. Preliminary results of a prospective study on 94 cases]. Chirurgie 124:666–669.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L, Borri A, et al. (2001) Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 44:836–841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, et al. (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech. Coloproctol. 6:83–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudhry V, et al. (2002) Early experience with stapled hem-orrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:360–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Slawik S, Kenefick N, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. (2007) A prospective evaluation of stapled haemor-rhoidopexy/rectal mucosectomy in the management of 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis. 9:352–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sobrado CW, Cotti GC, Coelho FF, Rocha JR. (2006) Initial experience with stapled hemorrhoidopexy for treatment of hemorrhoids. Arq. Gastroenterol. 43:238–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Touzin E, Hegge S, McKinley C. (2006) Early experience of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in a community hospital setting. Can. J. Surg. 49:316–320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Trentin G, Agresta F, Mainente P, Ciardo L, et al. (2002) [Our experience in the treatment of hemorrhoids and circumferential mucosal rectal prolapse using Longo muco-prolapsectomy]. Chir. Ital. 54:89–394.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Varela GG and Castaneda Ortiz EM. (2006) [Hemorrhoidopexy with a PPH 03 circular stapler initial experience]. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. 71:288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Abramowitz L, Godeberge P, Staumont G, Soudan D. (2001) Conference de consensus Traitment de la maladie hémorrhoïdaire. Ann. Chir. 126:845–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Corman ML, Gravie JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, et al. (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party — indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis. 5:304–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hemingway D. (2004) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a consensus paper. Colorectal Dis. 6:292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Warren BF. (2004) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a consensus paper. Colorectal Dis. 6:293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, et al. (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 21:172–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Silva JH. (2002) Pelvic lymphoscintigraphy: contribution to the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Sao Paulo 57:55–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tjandra JJ and Chan MK. (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis. Colon Rectum 50:78–892.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD005393

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lehur PA, Gravie JF, Meurette G. (2001) Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results. Colorectal Dis. 3:374–379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Anghelacopoulos SE, Tagarakis GI, Pilpilidis I, Kartsounis C, et al. (2006) Albumin-glutaraldehyde bioadhesive (“Bioglue”) for prevention of postoperative complications after stapled hemor-rhoidopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 118:469–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bozdag AD. (2005) A modified anoscope to facilitate the purse-string suture for stapled hemor-rhoidopexy. Tech. Coloproctol. 9:239–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Carriero A, Dal Borgo P, Pucciani F. (2001) Stapled mucosal prolapsectomy for haemorrhoidal prolapse with Lone Star Retractor System. Tech. Coloproctol. 5:41–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lloyd D, Ho KS, Seow-Choen F. (2002) Modified Longo's hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:416–417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Regadas FS, Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV, Misici R, et al. (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosec-tomy: a multicenter experience. Tech. Coloproctol. 9:243–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hoffman GH. (2006) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a new device and method of performance without using a pursestring suture. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jayne DG and Seow-Choen F. (2002) Modified stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circumferentially prolapsing piles. Tech. Coloproctol. 6:191–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Beck J and Szinicz G. (2001) Modified technique of stapled hemorroidectomy. Acta Chir. Austriaca 189:56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Aumann G, Petersen S, Pollack T, Hellmich G, et al. (2004) Severe intra-abdominal bleeding following stapled mucosectomy due to enterocele: report of a case. Tech. Coloproctol. 8:41–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Blouhos K, Vasiliadis K, Tsalis K, Botsios D, et al. (2007) Uncontrollable intra-abdominal bleeding necessitating low anterior resection of the rectum after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case. Surg. Today 37:254–257.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bonner C, Prohm P, Storkel S. (2001) [Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Case report and review of the literature]. Chirurg 72:1464–1466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, Accarpio GM, et al. (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, et al. (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:30–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Filingeri V and Gravante G. (2005) Pneumo-retroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema of the neck after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Tech. Coloproctol. 9:86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Giebel GD. (2002) [Comment on Ch. Bonner et al.: Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy]. Chirurg 73:288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Herold A and Kirsch JJ. (2000) Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:2187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW. (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 88:1449–1455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81 Huang WS, Chin CC, Yeh CH, Lin PY, et al. (2007) The late onset of an anal abscess caused by a chicken bone that complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 22:1291–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HG, Eberstein A, et al. (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 21:166–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. KanellosI,BlouhosK,DemetriadesH,Pramateftakis MG, et al. (2004) Pneumomediastinum after dilatation of anal stricture following stapled hemor-rhoidopexy. Tech. Coloproctol. 8:185–187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. (2002) Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hem-orrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:826–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Molloy RG and Kingsmore D. (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355:810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Pescatori M. (2000) Pain after stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy. Lancet 356:2188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Cobellis L, Bottini C, et al. (2006) The rectal pocket syndrome after stapled mucosectomy. Colorectal Dis. 8:808–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schumann D, Schuster A, et al. (2004) Early rectal stenosis following stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. BMC Surg. 4:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. (2002) Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumo-mediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:268–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Roos P. (2000) Haemorrhoid surgery revised. Lancet 355:1648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, Lin JK. (2003) Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:116–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Yao L, Zhong Y, Xu J, Xu M, et al. (2006) Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) — a report from China. World J. Surg. 30:1311–1315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Herold A, Kirsch J, Staude G, Hager T, et al. (2000) A German multicentre study on circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2(Suppl):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. (2005)Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 29:429–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Laurent B, Regenet N, et al. (2004) [Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidec-tomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature]. Ann. Chir. 129:571–577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Duque-Lopez X, et al. (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: a need for preservation of squamous epithelium. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:955–962.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Pigot F, Dao-Quang M, Castinel A, Juguet F, et al. (2006) Low hemorrhoidopexy staple line does not improve results and increases risk for incontinence. Tech. Coloproctol. 10:329–333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Floyd N, Reilly JC, et al. (2006) Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:1905–1909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Mlakar B and Kosorok P. (2005) Flavonoids to reduce bleeding and pain after stapled hemor-rhoidopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 117:558–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Koh DC, Cheong DM, Wong KS. (2005) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: bothersome staple line bleeding. Asian J. Surg. 28:193–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, et al. (2007) Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan—Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 94:1033–1037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. OrtizH, MarzoJ,ArmendarizP.(2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 89:1376–1381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH. (2003) Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hem-orrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Van de SJ, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, Chasse E, et al. (2005) Long-term results after excision haem-orrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids; a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir. Belg. 105:44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  105. MattanaC,CocoC,MannoA,VerboA,etal. (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: long-term evaluation and clinical results. Dis. Colon Rectum 50:1770–1775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Cook T, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL, et al. (1992) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendation on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 102:305S–311S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Sackett DL. (1989) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 95:2S–4S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Kanellos I, et al. (2007) Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years. Tech. Coloproctol. 11:144–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Parvaiz A, Azeem S, Singh RK, Lamparelli M. (2006) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: an alternative technique for the treatment of bleeding anorectal varices. Report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:411–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Biswas S, George ML, Leather AJ. (2003) Stapled anopexy in the treatment of anal varices: report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 46:1284–1285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Huang WS, Lin PY, Chin CC, Yeh CH, et al. (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed hemorrhoids in patients with liver cirrhosis; a preliminary outcome for 8-case experience. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 22:1083–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Fantin AC, Hetzer FH, Christ AD, Fried M, et al. (2002) Influence of stapler haemorrhoidectomy on anorectal function and on patients' acceptance. Swiss. Med. Wkly 132:38–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Lunniss PJ, Gladman MA, Hetzer FH, Williams NS, et al. (2004) Risk factors in acquired faecal incontinence. J. R. Soc. Med. 97:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Mlakar B. (2007) Should we avoid stapled hem-orrhoidopexy in males and females who practice receptive anal sex? Dis. Colon Rectum 50:1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Kekez T, Bulic K, Smudj D, Majerovic M. (2007) Is stapled hemorrhoidopexy safe for the male homosexual patient? Report of a case. Surg. Today 37:335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW. (2003) Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis. 5:29–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Beattie GC, McAdam TK, McIntosh SA, Loudon MA. (2006) Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis. 8:56– 61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Gabrielli F, Chiarelli M, Cioffi U, Guttadauro A, et al. (2001) Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia. Dis. Colon Rectum 44:842–844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Mariani P, Arrigoni G, Quartierini G, Dapri G, et al. (2005) Local anesthesia for stapled pro-lapsectomy in day surgery: results of a prospective trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 48:1447–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A. (2001) [The Longo and Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective comparative study of 300 patients ]. Chirurg 72:180–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Martinsons A, Narbuts Z, Brunenieks I, Pavars M, et al. (2007) A comparison of quality of life and postoperative results from combined PPH and conventional haemorrhoidectomy in different cases of haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 9:423–429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, et al. (2007) Long-term results after stapled hemor-rhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis. Colon Rectum 50:204–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Delikoukos S, Zacharoulis D, Hatzitheofilou C. (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia: tips and tricks. Dis. Colon Rectum 48:2153–2155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Esser S, Khubchandani I, Rakhmanine M. (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:1164–1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Gerjy R, Derwinger K, Nystrom PO. (2006) Perianal local block for stapled anopexy. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:1914–1921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Maw A, Concepcion R, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F, et al. (2003) Prospective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled haemor-rhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 90:222–226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Mantzoros I, et al. (2002) Stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy compared with Milligan—Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Eur. J. Surg. 168:621–625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Colak T, Akca T, Dirlik M, Kanik A, et al. (2003) Micronized flavonoids in pain control after hemor-rhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg. Today 33:828–832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Ho YH and Seow-Choen F. (2000) Randomized clinical trial of micronized flavonoids in the early control of bleeding from acute internal haemorrhoids. Br. J. Surg. 87:1732–1733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. La Torre F and Nicolai AP. (2004) Clinical use of micronized purified flavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:704–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Perez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, Candela F, et al. (2006) Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled muco-sectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 21:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Arroyo A, Perez-Vicente F, Miranda E, Sanchez A, et al. (2006) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for muco-sectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J. Surg. 30:1305–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. AngeloneG,Giardiello C,ProtaC. (2007) Bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidopexy using the PPH 03 stapler device. Experience and results in 100 consecutive patients. Chir. Ital. 59:225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, et al. (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidopexy: our experience. Tech. Coloproctol. 10:43–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Khalil KH, O'Bichere A, Sellu D. (2000) Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 87:1352–1355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Zmora O, Colquhoun P, Abramson S, Weiss EG, et al. (2004) Can the procedure for prolapsing hem- orrhoids (PPH) be done twice? Results of a porcine model. Surg. Endosc. 18:757–761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Yamamoto J, Nagai M, Smith TB, Tamaki S, et al. (2006) Adaptation of the pursestring suture ano-scope with a small hole in a case of stapled hemor-rhoidectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:925–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Guenin MO, Kern B, Ackermann C. (2005) Modification of the dilator used for Longo hemor-rhoidectomy]. J. Chir. (Paris) 142:406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Mathur P, Ho T, Spalinger R, Chirurgie FM, et al. (2004) The “winged” circular anal dilator in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:542–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Forshaw MJ, Mhandu PC, Parker MC. (2005) The use of the Deaver retractor to visualize staple line haemorrhage following stapled anopexy. Colorectal Dis. 7:96–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martino P, et al. (2001) Long-term effects of stapled haemor-rhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br. J. Surg. 88:1487–1491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Shanmugam V, Watson AJ, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, et al. (2005) Pathological audit of stapled haemorhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis. 7:172–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Weyand G, Webels F, Celebi H, Ommer A, et al. (2002) [Anal pressures after stapler hemorrhoid-ectomy — a prospective analysis of 33 patients ]. Zentralbl. Chir. 127:22–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Gravie JF. (2002) [The Longo technique: should it be adopted?]. Ann. Chir. 127:327–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. (2007) Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 22:245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Angelone G, Giardiello C, Prota C. (2006) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Complications and 2-year follow-up. Chir. Ital. 58:753–760.

    Google Scholar 

  147. M cD onald P J B ona R C ohen C R (2004) Rectovaginal fistula after stapled haemor-rhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis. 6:64–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P. (1999) Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie-Eine neue Alternative zu den kon-ventionellen Methoden. Zentralbl. Chir. 124:238–243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Arnaud JP, Pessaux P, Huten N, De Manzini N, et al. (2001) Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler, a new alternative to conventional methods: a prospective study of 140 patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 193:161–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Stukavec J and Horak L. (2006) [Complications of the Longo Procedure — rectal occlusion ]. Rozhl. Chir. 85:517–519.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. (2000) Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:2188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Seow-Choen F. (2001) Stapled haemorrhoidec-tomy: pain or gain. Br. J. Surg. 88:1–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Wexner SD. (2001) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Tech. Coloproctol. 5:56–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Williams R, Kondylis L, Geisler D, Kondylis P. (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy height as outcome indicator. Am. J. Surg. 193:336–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Bufo A, Galasse S, Amoroso M. (2006) Recurrent severe postoperative bleeding after stapled hemor-rhoidopexy requiring emergency laparotomy. Tech. Coloproctol. 10:62–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Grau LA, Budo AH, Fantova MJ, Sala XS. (2005) Perirectal haematoma and hypovolaemic shock after rectal stapled mucosectomy for haemorrhoids. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 20:471–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Cotton MH. (2005) Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 200:983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Daniel F, Sultan S, de Parades V, Bauer P, et al. (2006) Anal fissure and minor anorectal sep sis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:693–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. McCloud JM, Doucas H, Scott AD, Jameson JS. (2007) Delayed presentation of life-threatening perineal sepsis following stapled haemorrhoid-ectomy: a case report. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 89:301–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Pessaux P, Lermite E, Tuech JJ, Brehant O, et al. (2004) Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidec-tomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 199:824–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Ravo B. (2005) Septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 201:155–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. NICE. (2007) Technology Appraisal Guidance 128: stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids. Available at http://www.nice.org. uk/TA128.

  163. Farinetti A and Saviano M. (2000) [Surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using circular mechanical stapler. Analysis of costs ]. Minerva Chir. 55:401–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Longo A. (2003) Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal resection (STARR). Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium, Ft Lauderdale, FL, February 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, et al. (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 39:681–685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, et al. (2003) Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech. Coloproctol. 7:148–153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, et al. (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 47:1285–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana BM, et al. (2004) New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 19:359–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP. (2005) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defection caused by rectocele and rectoanal intussusception. Viszeralchirurgie 40:331–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Ommer A, Albrecht K, Wenger F, Walz MK. (2006) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 391:32–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Ommer A, Köhler A, Athana S, Athanasiadis S. (1998)ErgebnissedertransperinealenLevatorplastik bei der Behandlung de symptomatischen Rektocele. Chirurg 69:966–972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G, Izzo G, et al. (2006) Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 21:661–667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Sielaff M, Scherer R, Gögler H, Farke S. (2006) Die STARR-Operation. Coloproctology 28:17–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Arroyo A, Perez-Vicente F, Serrano P, Sanchez A, et al. (2007) Evaluation of the stapled transanal rectal resection technique with two staplers in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Pechlivanides G, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zervakis N, et al. (2007) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) to reverse the anatomic disorders of pelvic floor dyssynergia. World J. Surg. 31:1329–1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabro G, Maciocco M, et al. (2008) Stapled transanal rectal resection in solitary rectal ulcer associated with prolapse of the rectum: a prospective study. Dis. Colon Rectum 51:348–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF, Binda GA, et al. (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis. Colon Rectum 51:186–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Frascio M, Stabilini C, Ricci B, Marino P, et al. (2008) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction syndrome: results and follow-up. World J. Surg. 32:1110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. NICE. (2007) Interventional Procedure Guidance 169: Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Available at http://www.nice. org.uk/IPG169.

  180. Pescatori M, Favetta D, Dedola S, Orsini S. (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech. Coloproctol. 1:96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Veglia A, Petrolino M, et al. (2002) Combined perineal and endorectal repair of rectocele by circular stapler: a novel surgical technique. Dis. Colon Rectum 45:1549–1552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Corman ML, Carriero A, Hager T, Herold A, et al. (2006) Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation. Colorectal Dis. 8:98–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schuster A, Lehmann D, et al. (2006) Stapled transanal rectal resection under laparoscopic surveillance for rectocele and concomitant enterocele. Dis. Colon Rectum 49:685–689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Sciaudone G, Di Stazio C, Guadagni I, Selvaggi F. (2007) Rectal diverticulum: a new complication of STARR procedure for obstructed defecation. Tech. Coloproctol. 12:61–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia A. (2006) Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicated by haematoma of the posterior vaginal wall: report of a case. Tech. Coloproctol. 10:61–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Li DG, Scilletta B, Tomaselli TG, Zarbo G. (2008) Rectovaginal fistula: a new approach by stapled transanal rectal resection. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12:601–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hetzer, F.H., Senagore, A. (2009). The Evidence for Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and STARR. In: Jayne, D., Stuto, A. (eds) Transanal Stapling Techniques for Anorectal Prolapse. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-904-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-905-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics