Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Areas of Controversy and Future Research

  • Chapter
Transanal Stapling Techniques for Anorectal Prolapse

  • 520 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Longo A: Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosal and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome, Italy, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM: Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemor-rhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidec-tomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:779–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartely JE: Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK: Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356:730–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pescatori M :Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356:2188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D :Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355:810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shalaby R, Desoky A :Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidec-tomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1049–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL, Seow-Choen F:Stapled hemorrhoidectomy —cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:1666–1675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S:Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group:A prospective, randomized, controlled multi-center trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy:perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1824–1836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, VM:Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemor-rhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182:64–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A:Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy:a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002; 17:50–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregan L:Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy:a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:1367–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P:Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1376–1381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S:Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88:669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR:Stapled versus excision haemor-rhoidectomy:long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361:1437–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nisar P.J, Acheson A.G, Neal K.R, Scholefield J.H:Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy:systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1837–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, Accarpio GM, Dodi G, Cavallari F, Ravo B, Annibali R:Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1846–1851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S:Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse:is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 2006; 8:130–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH :Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy:systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1837–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL :Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy:a French multicentric study. Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique 2005; 29:429–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, Milito G, Dodi G, Mascagni D, Orsini S, Pietroletti R, Ripetti V, Tagariello GB:Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy:can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6:83–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK :Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dise Colon Rectum 2007; 50:878–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van de SJ, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, Chasse E, Penninckx F:Belgian Section of Colorectal Surgery Royal Belgian Society for Surgery:Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids; a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 2005; 105:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von FM, Ackermann C:Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy:high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50:204–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von FM, Ackermann C:Ferguson hemorrhoidec-tomy:long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1523–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH:Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shanmugam V, Watson AJ, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, Loudon MA:Pathological audit of stapled haemorhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7:172–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Floyd N, Reilly JC, Geisler DP, Kondylis PD:Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:1905–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams R, Kondylis L, Geisler D, Kondylis P :Stapled hemorrhoidopexy height as outcome indicator. Am J Surg 2007; 193:336–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arroyo A, Perez-Vicente F, Miranda E, Sanchez A, Serrano P, Candela F, Oliver I, Calpena R:Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 2006; 30:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Esser S, Khubchandani I, Rakhmanine M:Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ong CH, Chee Boon FE, Keng V:Ambulatory circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under regional anaesthesia. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75:184–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Law WL, Tung HM, Chu KW, Lee FC:Ambulatory stapled haemorrhoidectomy:a safe and feasible surgical technique. Hong Kong Med J 2003; 9:103–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, Phillips RK:Double-blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haem-orrhoidectomy. Lancet 1998; 351:169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan KY, Sng KK, Tay KH, Lai JH, Eu KW:Randomized clinical trial of 0.2 per cent glyceryl trinitrate ointment for wound healing and pain reduction after open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1464–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patti R, Angileri M, Migliore G, Sammartano S, Termine S, Crivello F, Gioe FP, Di VG :Effectiveness of contemporary injection of botulinum toxin and topical application of glyceryl trinitrate against postoperative pain after Milligan-Morgan haemor-rhoidectomy. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 2006; 77:503–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathai V, Ong BC, Ho YH :Randomized controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy with haemor-rhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83:380–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL :Postdefaecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 2005; 92:208–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mlakar B, Kosorok P :Flavonoids to reduce bleeding and pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy:a randomized controlled trial. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2005; 117:558–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA:Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy:a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:1437–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE:Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan—Morgan haemorrhoidectomy:randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:782–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goligher JC :Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. ed 5th ed., London, Bailliere Tindall, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jayne DG, Seow-Choen F :Modified stapled haem-orrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circum-ferentially prolapsing piles. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6:191–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Gaincario R :Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Papagrigoriadis S, Vardonikolaki A:Stapled anopexy with double stapling:a safe and efficient treatment for fourth degree haemorrhoids. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 2006; 106:717–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Slawik S, Kenefick N, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR:A prospective evaluation of stapled haemor-rhoidopexy/rectal mucosectomy in the management of 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9:352–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwandner O, Bruch HP:Significance ofobstructed defaecation in haemorrhoidal disease:results of a prospective study. Coloproctol 2006; 28:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jorge JM, Wexner SD :Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Marquist P, De La Loge C, Dubois D, McDermott A, Chassaney O:Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40:540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Brooks P:EuroQol:the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37:53–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F:Surgery for rectal prolapse:Orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:1136–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F :Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surgery 2004; 91:1500–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mockford K, Loughenbury P, Culverwell A, Jayne DG:Ob-structed defacation syndrome:a comparism of the ODS and KESS scoring systems. 2nd World Congress of coloproctology and pelvic disease, 2007. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  54. Altomore DF, Spazzafuma L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V :Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bartram CJ, Turnball GK, Lennard-Jones JE:Evacuation proctography, an investigation of rectal expulsion in twenty subjects without def-ecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 1988; 13:72–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shorovan PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW:Defecography in normal volunteers, results and implications. Gut 1989; 30:1737–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M:Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctology 2003; 7:148–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ganio F, Masin A, Ratto C, Altomore DF, Ripetti V, Clerico G, Lise M, Daglietto GB, Memeo V, landolfi V, Del Genio A, Arullani A, Giardiello G, ds Seta F:Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances:results in 40 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 44:1261–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CRG, Nicholls CJ, Kamm MA:Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1570–1571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Surgical Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK

    D. G. Jayne

  2. 2nd Surgical Unit, Ospedale S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy

    A. Stuto

Authors
  1. D. G. Jayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Stuto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leeds General Hospital, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK

    David Jayne

  2. 2nd Surgical Unit, “Ospedale S: maria degli Angeli”, Pordenone, Italy

    Angelo Stuto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jayne, D.G., Stuto, A. (2009). Areas of Controversy and Future Research. In: Jayne, D., Stuto, A. (eds) Transanal Stapling Techniques for Anorectal Prolapse. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-904-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-905-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation