Skip to main content

The Human Modes of Being in Investigating User Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future Interaction Design II

Abstract

An important challenge for interaction designers is to understand factors that shape user experience, and novel approaches are being developed to establish user experience as a specific field of research. Previous attempts to provide a comprehensive theory of user experience have focused on analyzing sensations and emotions as well as perceptions and behaviors. A holistic view of human experience is still lacking. I argue that a holistic view of the human being is needed to provide the appropriate theoretical foundations for user experience analyses in diverse contexts. In this chapter I introduce a theoretical framework for understanding human experience, and discuss how such a holistic view can reveal how fundamental human modes of being contribute to and shape user experience while people interact with information and communication technologies. Investigating user experience with the help of this framework facilitates interaction designers’ understanding of factors that shape a holistic user experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth & Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, P. J., & May, J. (1993). Cognitive modelling for user requirements. In P. F. Byerley, P. J. Barnard, & J. May (Eds.), Computers, communication and usability: Design issues, research and methods for integrated services (pp. 101–146) Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee, K. (2003). Defining co-experience. In Proceedings of the 2003 Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI) Conference (pp. 109–113). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves (pp. 463–470). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, M. (2005). User experience of communication before and during rendezvous: Interim results. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 9(3), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgård, P., & Halskov, K. (2006). Real life experiences within experience design. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing roles (pp. 331–340). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 261–268). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., & Ford, S. (2000). The building blocks of experience: An early framework for interaction designers. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 419–423). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhill, A., & Isomäki, H. (2005). Incorporating self into web information system design. In A. Pirhonen, H. Isomäki, C. Roast, & P. Saariluoma (Eds.), Future interaction design (pp. 53–66). London: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. A., & Randolph, G. B. (2000). Web experience and hypermedia structure in on-line learning. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Consortium on Computing in Small Colleges Rocky Mountain Conference (pp. 44–53). Chicago: Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience: A research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1980). Consciousness in contemporary psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsjärvi, S. (1982). Kasvatustieteen käsitteistö [Concepts in education science]. Keuruu, Finland: Otava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, H. (2002). The prevailing conceptions of the human being in information systems development: systems designers’ reflections (Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Rep. No. A-2002-6). Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, H. (2007). Different levels of information systems designers’ forms of thought and potential for human-centred design. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 3(1), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1993). Four systems of emotion activation: Cognitive and non-cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100(1), 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenpää, S., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., Failla, A., & Miller, B. (2007). Tacit knowledge in rapidly evolving organizational environments. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 3(1), 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on human experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K., & Welke, J. (1984). Implementation failure and system developer values: Assumptions, truisms and empirical evidence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–12). Atlanta, GA: Association of Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, T., & Kuhmonen, P. (1995). Filosofinen antropologia: Ihmisen kokonaisuutta etsimässä. [Philosophical anthropology: In search of the whole of the human being]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Atena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24, 672–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlke, S., & Thüring, M. (2007). Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 915–918). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2001). Cross-cultural user-interface design for work, home, play and on the way. In Proceedings of the SIGDOC ’01Conference (pp. 91–98). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., Wright, P., Wallace, J., & Dearden, A. (2006). The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10(6), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, N., & Kirakowski, J. (2006). Functionality, usability and user experience: Three areas of concern. interactions, 13(6), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelitsch, G., Williams, J., Osen, M., Jimenez, B., & Rapp, S. (2004). Haptic chameleon: A new concept of shape-changing user interface controls with force feedback. In CHI ’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1305–1308). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1983). Designing human systems: The ETHICS method. Manchester, UK: Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muramatsu, J. (2003). Social regulation in virtual spaces. In CHI ’03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 91–98). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Prove, M. (2007). Community experience at OpenOffice.org. Interactions, 14(6), 47–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, P. (1968). Models of man. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porra, J. (1996). Colonial systems, information colonies and punctuated prototyping. (Doctoral dissertation; Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics Rep. No. 33). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendinger, H., Ma, C., & Yingzi, J. (2005). Understanding the effect of life-like interface agents through users’ eye movements. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 108–115). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauhala, L. (1983). Ihmiskäsitys ihmistyössä [The conception of the human being in human work]. Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropo, E. (1985). Erilaisista ihmiskäsityksistä [On different conceptions of the human being]. In Ihmiskuva ja kasvatuksen haasteet [Image of the human being and the challenges of education] (Rep. No. 1; pp. 3–17). Helsinki, Finland: Tieteenfilosofinen tutkimusseura ry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporka, A. J., Nêmec, V., & Slavík, P. (2005). Tangible newspaper for the visually impaired users. In CHI ’05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1809–1812). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl, A., Sundström, P. & Höök, K. (2005). A foundation for emotional expressivity. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Designing for User eXperience (Paper No. 33). New York: American Institute of Graphic Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, D., Blythe, M., & Wright, P. (2006). Grounding experience: Relating theory and method to evaluate the user experience of smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 91–98). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: An autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1435–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilenius, R. (1978). Ihminen, luonto ja tekniikka. [The human being, nature and technology]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Gummerus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilenius, R. (1987). Ihminen filosofisena ongelmana. [The human being as a philosophical problem]. In R. Wilenius, P. Oksala, L. Mehtonen, & M. Juntunen (Eds.), Johdatus filosofiseen ajatteluun [Introduction to philosophical thinking]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Atena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & McCarthy, J. (2005). The value of the novel in designing for experience. In A. Pirhonen, H. Isomäki, C. Roast, & P. Saariluoma (Eds.), Future interaction design (9–30). London: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, D. & van der Veer, G. (2006). Rich evaluations of entertainment experience: bridging the interpretational gap. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Trust and control in complex socio-technical systems (pp. 137–144). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannakaisa Isomäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isomäki, H. (2009). The Human Modes of Being in Investigating User Experience. In: Isomäki, H., Saariluoma, P. (eds) Future Interaction Design II. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-300-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-385-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics