Skip to main content

Human Factors Engineering in Large-scale Digital Control Systems

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

An approach to improve human reliability is introduced in this chapter. Major methods to analyze human reliability have been reviewed in Chapter 7. Chapter 8 presents human factors-related activities to design a human-machine interface (HMI), especially for nuclear power plant (NPP) applications. Human factors engineering (HFE) is strictly applied in the nuclear industry. Designing a good HMI enhances human reliability and prevents human errors, as well as helping with training and proceduralization. An HFE process to design an HMI for a safety critical system that requires high reliability for operators consists of three steps: analysis, design, and verification & validation (V&V).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. US NRC (2002) Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model. NUREG-0711, Rev. 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lamarsh JR (1983) Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Addison Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bye A, Hollnagel E, Brendeford TS (1999) Human-machine function allocation: a functional modelling approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety: 64, 291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive Work Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schraagen JM, Chipman S F, Shalin V L (2000) Cognitive Tasks Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK (1992) A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luczak H (1997) Task analysis. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Ed. Salvendy G. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shepherd A (2001) Hierarchical Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Annett J (2003) Hierarchical Task Analysis. Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, Ed. E. Hollnagel, Ch. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen J, Pejtersen A M, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rasmussen J (1986) Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JH, Seong PH (2003) A quantitative approach to modeling the information flow of diagnosis tasks in nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 80: 81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH, Lee SJ, Seong PH (2003) Investigation on applicability of information theory to prediction of operator performance in diagnosis tasks at nuclear power plants. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 50: 1238–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ha CH, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Seong PH (2006) Investigation on relationship between information flow rate and mental workload of accident diagnosis tasks in NPPs. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 53: 1450–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reason J (1990) Human Error. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wickens CD, Lee J, Liu Y, Becker SG (2004) An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63: 81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wickens CD, Hollands JG (1999) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gentner D, Stevens AL (1983) Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moray N (1997) Human factors in process control. Ch. 58, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Ed., G. Salvendy, A Wiley-Interscience Publication

    Google Scholar 

  21. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Eric JJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen J, Jensen A (1974) Mental procedures in real-life tasks: A case study of electronic trouble shooting. Ergonomics 17: 293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasmussen J (1981) Models of mental strategies in process plant diagnosis. In: Rasmussen J, Rouse WB, Ed., Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures. New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woods DD, Roth EM (1988) Cognitive Systems Engineering. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Ed. M. Helander. Elsevier Science Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  25. US NRC (2002) Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines. NUREG-0700

    Google Scholar 

  26. Endsley MR (1988) Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting: 97–101

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones DG, Endsley MR (1996) Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 67: 507–512

    Google Scholar 

  28. Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37: 32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Donnell RD, Eggenmeier FT (1986) Workload assessment methodology. Ch. 42, Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Ed. Boff KR, et al., Wiley-Interscience Publications

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders MS, McCormick EJ (1993) Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tsang P, Wilson GF (1997) Mental workload. Ch. 13, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Ed. Salvendy G, Wiley-Interscience Publications

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gawron VJ (2000) Human Performance Measures Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  33. US NRC (1994) Advanced Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines. NUREG/CR-5908

    Google Scholar 

  34. Department of Defense (1999) MIL-STD-1472F, Design Criteria Standard

    Google Scholar 

  35. EPRI (1984) Computer-generated display system guidelines. EPRI NP-3701

    Google Scholar 

  36. O’Hara JM, Hall MW (1992) Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: Implications for human reliability. IEEE transactions on Nuclear Science 39(4): 919–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tullis TS (1988) Screen design. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Ed. M. Helander, Elsevier Science Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  38. Danchak MM (1976) CRT displays for power plants. Instrumentation Technology 23: 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  39. NASA (1980) Spacelab Display Design and Command Usage Guidelines, MSFC-PROC-711A, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center

    Google Scholar 

  40. IEEE (1998) IEEE Guide for the Application of Human Factors Engineering in the Design of Computer-Based Monitoring and Control Displays for Nuclear Power Generating Stations. IEEE-Std 1289

    Google Scholar 

  41. US NRC (1983) Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278

    Google Scholar 

  42. US NRC (2000) Advanced Information Systems Design: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance. NUREG/CR-6633

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vicente KJ, Rasmussen J (1992) Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 22: 589–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 13: 257–266

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rasmussen J (1985) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 15: 234–243

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vicente KJ (1995) Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 25: 529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ham DH, Yoon WC (2001) The effects of presenting functionally abstracted information in fault diagnosis tasks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 73: 103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Braseth AO, A building block for information rich dispays. IFEA Conference on Alarmhandtering on Gardermoen

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hollnagel E, Bye A, Hoffmann M (2000) Coping with complexity – strategies for information input overload. Proceedings of CSEPC 2000: 264–268

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffmann M, Bye A, Hollnagel E (2000) Responding to input information overload in process control – a simulation of operator behavior. Proceedings of CSEPC 2000: 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  51. US NRC (2002) The Effects of Interface Management Tasks on Crew Performance and Safety in Complex, Computer Based Systems. NUREG/CR-6690

    Google Scholar 

  52. Woods DD (1990) Navigating through large display networks in dynamic control applications. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  53. US NRC (2000) Computer-Based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance. NUREG/CR-6634

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parasuraman P (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39: 230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. IAEA (1992) The Role of Automation and Humans in Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA-TECDOC-668

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sarter NB, Woods DD, Billings CE (1997) Automation surprise. Ch. 57, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Ed. Salvendy G, Wiley-Interscience Publications

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fitts PM (1951) Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic Control System. Washington DC, National Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  58. Endsley MR, Kaber DB (1999) Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42: 462–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sheridan T (1980) Computer control and human alienation. Technology Review 10: 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  60. http://opis.kins.re.kr, Operational Performance Information System for Nuclear Power Plant

    Google Scholar 

  61. Niwa Y, Takahashi M, Kitamura M (2001) The design of human-machine interface for accident support in nuclear power plants. Cognition, Technology & Work 3: 161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sun BK, Cain DG (1991) Computer application for control room operator support in nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 33: 331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Woods DD, Wise J, Hanes L (1982) Evaluation of safety parameter display concept. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bernard JA (1992) Issues regarding the design and acceptance of intelligent support systems for reactor operators. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 39: 1549–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bernard JA, Washio T (1989) Expert System Application within the Nuclear Industry. American Nuclear Society

    Google Scholar 

  66. Adelman L (1992) Evaluating Decision Support and Expert Systems. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kim IS (1994) Computerized systems for on-line management of failures: a state-ofthe-art discussion of alarm systems and diagnostic systems applied in the nuclear industry. Reliability Engineering and Safety System 44: 279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Niwa Y, Hollnagel E, Green M (1996) Guidelines for computerized presentation of emergency operating procedures. Nuclear Engineering and Design 167: 113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pirus D, Chambon Y (1997) The computerized procedures for the French N4 series. IEEE Sixth Annual Human Factors Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  70. Woods DD, Roth EM (1988) Cognitive systems engineering. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Ch. 1, Ed. Helander M, Elsevier Science Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hollnagel E, Mancini G, Woods DD (1988) Cognitive Engineering in Complex Dynamic Worlds. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  72. Woods DD (1986) Paradigms for intelligent decision support. Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments, Ed. Hollnagel E, Mancini G, Woods DD, New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kim JH, Seong PH (2007) The effect of information types on diagnostic strategies in the information aid. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92: 171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yoon WC, Hammer JM (1988) Deep-reasoning fault diagnosis: an aid and a model. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 18: 659–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Roth EM, Mumaw RJ, Stubler WF (1992) Human factors evaluation issues for advanced control rooms: a research agenda. IEEE Fifth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants: 254–259

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kim JH. Seong PH (2000) A methodology for the quantitative evaluation of NPP diagnostic systems’ dynamic aspects. Annals of Nuclear Energy 27: 1459–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. IEEE (1998) IEEE Standard for Software Verification and Validation. IEEE-Std 1012

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wieringa PA, Wawoe DP (1998) The operator support system dilemma: balancing a reduction in task complexity vs. an increase in system complexity. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: 993–997

    Google Scholar 

  79. Meister D (1986) Human Factors Testing and Evaluation. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  80. Williges R, Wierwille WW (1979) Behavioral measures of aircrew mental workload. Human Factors 21: 549–574

    Google Scholar 

  81. O’Hara JM, Stubler WF, Higgins JC, Brown WS (1997) Integrated System Validation: Methodology and Review Criteria. NUREG/CR-6393, US NRC

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hill SG, Iavecchia HP, Byers JC, Bittier AC, Zaklad AL, Christ RE (1992) Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors 34: 429–440

    Google Scholar 

  83. Endsley MR, Garland DJ (2001) Situation Awareness: Analysis and Measurement. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lee DH, Lee HC (2000) A review on measurement and applications of situation awareness for an evaluation of Korea next generation reactor operator performance. IE Interface 13: 751–758

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sarter NB. Woods DD (1991) Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1: 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Pew RW (2000) The state of situation awareness measurement: heading toward the next century. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Ed. Endsley MR, Garland DJ. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  87. Fracker ML, Vidulich MA (1991) Measurement of situation awareness: A brief review. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the international Ergonomics Association: 795–797

    Google Scholar 

  88. Endsley MR (1996) Situation awareness measurement in test and evaluation. Handbook of Human Factors Testing and Evaluation, Ed. O’Brien TG, Charlton SG. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  89. Taylor RM (1990) Situational Awareness: Aircrew Constructs for Subject Estimation, IAM-R-670

    Google Scholar 

  90. Moister KL, Chidester TR (1991) Situation assessment and situation awareness in a team setting. Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems, Ed. Taylor RM, IAM Report 708, Farnborough, UK, Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wilson GF (2000) Strategies for psychophysiological assessment of situation awareness. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Ed. Endsley MR, Garland DJ. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  92. Drøivoldsmo A, Skraaning G, Sverrbo M, Dalen J, Grimstad T, Andresen G (1988) Continuous Measure of Situation Awareness and Workload. HWR-539, OECD Halden Reactor Project

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, J., Seong, P. (2009). Human Factors Engineering in Large-scale Digital Control Systems. In: Seong, P. (eds) Reliability and Risk Issues in Large Scale Safety-critical Digital Control Systems. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-384-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-384-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-383-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-384-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics