Skip to main content

Visualization Options

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scar-Less Surgery

Abstract

Minimal access surgery has come of age over the last 30 years. Urologists have been practicing minimal access surgery that has been genuinely scarless for more than 80 years. However, those scarless surgeries (and genuinely natural orifice endoscopic surgeries) were performed using the portal of the urethra to access the genitourinary organs. Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy by Muhe in 1985, laparoscopic surgery has been used to operate on every organ within the abdominal cavity using multiple small incisions ranging from 3 to 15 mm. These were all performed using rigid rod-lens endoscopes for visualizing the abdominal cavity. In open surgery the vision was binocular and the visual axis and the operating hands were in line, causing an acute and equal azimuth angle (defined in laparoscopic surgery as the angle between the visual axis and the operating or working axis) and allowing movements to be automatic, ingrained, and intuitive. In laparoscopy, the magnification and reproduction of the image on a monitor via a closed-circuit system significantly alter the image, influencing visual perception and causing a peripheral convexity or barrel distortion, called the fish-eye effect. Coupled with a widening and at times obtuse azimuth angle, this made laparoscopic surgery difficult and necessitated a great deal of mental processing, including learning hand-eye coordination, interpretation of the dimensions, and tissue recognition and depth perception based on the visual clues provided by this enhanced apparent image. However, this “Nintendo Surgical Revolution,” which began in 1987, was something that the “Nintendo” generation or the twenty first-century surgeon could relate to, and by the turn of the century, laparoscopy was the accepted gold standard for most routine abdominal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walker KM. Transurethral resection of the prostate. Br Med J. 1937;1(3982):901–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds Jr W. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5(1):89–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A. Visual displays and visual perception in minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg. 1995;2(3):209–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marohn MR, Hanly EJ. Twenty-first century surgery using twenty-first century technology: surgical robotics. Curr Surg. 2004;61(5):466–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao GV, Reddy DN, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008;18(2):361–70; x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(1):114–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rane A, Rao P. Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology. 2008;72(2):260–3; discussion 263–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(2):329–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):762–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai MM, Stein R, Rao P, et al. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for advanced reconstruction: initial experience. Urology. 2009;73(1):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Stern JM, Cadeddu JA. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology. 2007;70(6):1039–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(4):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A. The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(5):336–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rane A, Kommu S, Eddy B, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port) and evolution of the single laparoscopic port procedure (SLiPP). J Endourol. 2007;21 Suppl 1:A22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Transumbilical endoscopic appendectomy in humans: on the road to NOTES: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(4):579–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):734–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int. 2008;101(1):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andonian S, Herati AS, Atalla MA, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site Pfannenstiel donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2010;75(1):9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawahara H, Kubota A, Okuyama H, et al. One-trocar laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy in handicapped children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(12):2076–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khosla A, Ponsky TA. Use of operative laparoscopes in single-port surgery: the forgotten tool. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7(1):116–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eskef K, Oehmke F, Tchartchian G, et al. A new variable-view rigid endoscope evaluated in advanced gynecologic laparoscopy: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3260–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tevaearai HT, Mueller XM, von Segesser LK. 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer. Endoscopy. 2000;32(6):464–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iselin C, Fateri F, Caviezel A, et al. Usefulness of the Da Vinci robot in urologic surgery. Rev Med Suisse. 2007;3(136):2766–8, 2770, 2772.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spana G, Rane A, Kaouk JH. Is robotics the future of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)? BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):1018–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buess G, Kipfmuller K, Hack D, et al. Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc. 1988;2(2):71–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, et al. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1992;163(1):63–9; discussion 69–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Swain P, et al. Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experimental surgical study in human cadavers. Endoscopy. 2008;40(11):918–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K, et al. Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(6):1149–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moreira-Pinto J, Lima E, Correia-Pinto J, Rolanda C. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(33):3795–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. NOTES: transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans—preliminary report of a case series. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(4):843–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery white paper, October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(2):199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shaikh SN, Thompson CC. Natural orifice translumenal surgery: flexible platform review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2(6):210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Voermans RP, Faigel DO, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Comparison of transcolonic NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for the detection of peritoneal metastases. Endoscopy. 2010;42(11):904–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Voermans RP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA, Fockens P. Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(7):e61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanstrom LL. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(12):2720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spaun GO, Zheng B, Martinec DV, et al. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(6):e39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ, et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rao PP, Bhagwat S. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery—current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7(1):6–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;247(4):583–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep P. Rao M.B., MNAMS, DNB (Urol), FRCSED .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rao, P.P., Mishra, S., Rao, P.P. (2013). Visualization Options. In: Rane, A., Cadeddu, J., Desai, M., Gill, I. (eds) Scar-Less Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-360-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-360-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-359-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-360-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics