Skip to main content

Feedback Structures as a Key Requirement for Robustness: Case Studies in Image Processing

  • Chapter
Book cover Robust Intelligent Systems
  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

Natural as well as technical systems owe their robustness to a large extent to feedback structures. To use feedback, it is necessary to define a measurement, an actuator in the system, and a setpoint or reference—the measurement is compared with the reference and an actuator action is derived from the difference between them. This simple but powerful structure is responsible for providing the system with robustness against external influences. For a detailed discussion, the image processing system is chosen. The robustness of an image processing system is considered here to be the ability of an algorithm to achieve the desired output independently of numerous external influences such as illumination conditions, the imaging system, and imaged objects characteristics. Because of a number of problems, such as the absence of feedback from the higher to the lower processing levels, a traditional image processing system is of low robustness. This chapter presents the novel idea of the inclusion of feedback control at different processing levels to overcome the above problems of traditional image processing. The main idea behind this is to change the processing parameters in a closed-loop manner so that the current processing result at a particular processing level is driven to a reference result, providing the subsequent higher processing level with reliable input data. Presenting image processing as a new control application field, the chapter focuses on the specific features of image processing that make closed-loop control in this area different from conventional industrial control. The advantage of feedback for this advanced, prominent, and important application area is demonstrated through two examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abutableb, A. S. (1989). Automatic thresholding of gray-level pictures using two-dimensional entropy. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 47(1):22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhanu, B. and Lee, S. (1994). Genetic Learning for Adaptive Image Segmentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S. and Barratt, C. (1991).Linear Controller Design—Limits of Performance. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,8(6):679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. A. (2005). Content-adaptive feature extraction using image variance. Pattern Recognition, 38(12):2426–2436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimble, M. J. (1994). Robust Industrial Control—Optimal Design Approach for Polynomial Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, X. C. and Yung, N. H. C. (2004). Curvature scale space corner detector with adaptive threshold and dynamic region of support. In 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition(ICPR’04), volume 2, pages 791–794, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillers, B., Aiteanu, D., and Gräser, A. (2004). Augmented-reality helmet for the manual welding process. In Ong, S. and Nee, A., editors, Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing, pages 351–370. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, I. M. (1993).Quantitative Feedback Design Theory (QFT). QFT Publications, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. K. (1962).Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 8:179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Y., Domingues, A., Driouchi, D., and Treuillet, S.(2006).Design of experiments for performance evaluation and parameter tuning of a road image processing chain. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2006: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirhmedi, M., Palmer, P. L., and Kittler, J. (1997). Robust line segment extraction using genetic algorithms. In 6th IEE International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications, pages 141–145, Dublin, Ireland. IEE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, F. and Suomela, R. (1998). Robust image corner detection through curvature scale space. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,20(12):1376–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J. and Bhanu, B. (1998).Closed-loop object recognition using reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(2):139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristić, D. (2007). Feedback Structures in Image Processing, PhD Thesis. Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristić, D. and Gräser, A. (2006). Performance measure as feedback variable in image processing. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2006:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristić, D., Volosyak, I., and Gräser, A. (2005). Feedback control in image processing. ATP International—Automation Technology in Practice, 1:61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifakis, E. and Tziritas, G. (2003). Robust object boundary determination using locally adaptive level setalgorithm. In International Conference on Image Processing, volume 1, pages 141–144, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volosyak, I., Ivlev, O., and Gräser, A.(2005). Rehabilitation robot FRIEND II—the general concept and current implementation. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics(ICORR’05), pages 540–544, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuppala, S. K., Grigorescu, S., Ristić, D., and Gräser, A. (2007). Robust color object recognition for a service robotic task in the system FRIEND II. In 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR’07), pages 704–713, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M., Fraschini, M., Masek, M., and Bruynooghe, M. (2006). Performance evaluation in image processing. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2006:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. and Shi, J. (2001). A robust algorithm for feature point matching. Computer and Graphics, 26:429–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Gräser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gräser, A., Ristić, D. (2008). Feedback Structures as a Key Requirement for Robustness: Case Studies in Image Processing. In: Schuster, A. (eds) Robust Intelligent Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-261-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-261-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-260-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-261-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics