Abstract
Inclusive design is concerned with the “design of mainstream products and/or services that are accessible to, and usable by, people with the widest range of abilities within the widest range of situations without the need for special adaptation or design” (BSI, 2005). What does “the widest range of abilities” of people refer to? Usually, users’ abilities are categorized into sensory, motor, and cognitive abilities (Keates and Clarkson, 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
11.5 References
Bias RG (1994) The pluralistic usability walkthrough: coordinated empathies. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds.) Usability inspection methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, US
Blackler A (2006) Intuitive interaction with complex artefacts. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
BSI (2005) Design management systems — part 6: managing inclusive design — guide. British Standards Institution, London, UK
Clarkson J, Coleman R, Hosking I, Waller S (eds.) (2007) Inclusive design toolkit. Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, US
Hampe B (ed.) (2005) From perception to meaning. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, US
Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Ziegler J, Szwillus G (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Leipzig, Germany
Hurtienne J, Blessing L (2007) Design for intuitive use — testing image schema theory for user interface design. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’07), Paris, France
Hurtienne J, Israel JH, Weber K (2008) Cooking up real world usiness applications combining physicality, digitality, and image schemas. In: Proceedings of Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI’08), Bonn, Germany
Johnson M (1987) The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, US
Keates S, Clarkson J (2003) Countering design exclusion. In: Clarkson J, Coleman R, Keates S, Lebbon C (eds.) Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Springer, London, UK
Koffka K (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, NY, US
Naumann A, Hurtienne J, Israel JH, Mohs C, Kindsmüller MC, Meyer HA et al. (2007) Intuitive use of user interfaces: defining a vague concept. In: Harris D (ed.) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
Story MF (1998) Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive Technology, 10: 4–12
Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12: 97–136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hurtienne, J., Weber, K., Blessing, L. (2008). Prior Experience and Intuitive Use: Image Schemas in User Centred Design. In: Langdon, P., Clarkson, J., Robinson, P. (eds) Designing Inclusive Futures. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-211-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-211-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-210-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-211-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)