Skip to main content

The Role and Implications of the Internet in Healthcare Delivery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Service in the Internet Age

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

  • 1151 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing on a study of the Internet usage of Australian men with prostate cancer , this chapter investigates how access to information and online support affects men’s experiences of disease and, in particular, the possible implications of Internet-informed patients for the doctor/patient relationship. The data reveal that accessing information and/or support online can have a profound effect on men’s experiences of prostate cancer, providing a method of taking some control over their disease and limiting inhibitions experienced in face-to-face encounters. However, it is also clear that some medical specialists view Internet-informed patients as a challenge to their power within medical encounters and, as a result, employ disciplinary strategies that reinforce traditional patient roles and alienate patients who use the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Gleason system evaluates how effectively the cells of any particular cancer are able to structure themselves into glands resembling those of the normal prostate. The ability of a tumour to mimic normal gland architecture is called its differentiation, and a tumour whose structure is nearly normal (well differentiated) will probably have a biological behaviour that is not very aggressively malignant.

  2. 2.

    Brachytherapy is an advanced cancer treatment. Radioactive seeds or sources are placed in or near the tumour itself, giving a high radiation dose to the tumour while reducing the radiation exposure in the surrounding healthy tissues. The term “brachy” is Greek for short distance, and brachytherapy is radiation therapy given at a short distance: localized, precise, and high-tech.

References

  • Ahmann E (2000) Supporting families' savvy use of the Internet for health research. Pediatric Nursing 26:419–423

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW (2004) Australia’s Health. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Rainey M, Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of cyberhealthcare on the physician/patient relationship. Journal of Medical Systems 27:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisecker A, Beisecker T (1990) Patient information-seeking behaviours when communicating with doctors. Medical Care 28:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berland G, Elliot M, Morales L, Algazy J, Kravitz R, Broder M, Kanouse D, Muñoz J, Puyol J, Lara M, Watkins K, Yang H, McGlynn E (2001) Health information of the internet: accessibility, quality and readability in English and Spanish Journal of the American Medical Association 285:2612–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradlow A, Coulter A, Brooks P (1992) Patterns of referral. Oxford, Health Services Research Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom A (2004) Prostate cancer and masculinity in Australian society: A case of stolen identity? International Journal of Men’s Health 3:73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom A (2005a) Virtually he@lthy: A study into the impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor/patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research 15:325–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom A (2005b) The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. Journal of Sociology 41:87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom A (2005c) Medical specialists’ accounts of the impact of the Internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health 9:319–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom A (2006) The impact of the Internet on patients’ expectations. Nature Clinical Practice Urology 3:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom A, Tovey, P (2008) The role of the Internet in cancer patients’ engagement with complementary and alternative cancer treatments. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 12(2):139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows R, Nettleton S, Pleace N, Pleace N, Muncer S (2000) Virtual community care: social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication and Society 3:95–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron E, Bernardes J (1998) Gender and disadvantage in health: men's health for a change. Sociology of Health and Illness 20:673–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (1990) ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine 30:1161–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline R, Haynes K (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research 16:671–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotten S (2001) Implications of Internet technology for medical sociology in the new millennium. Sociological Spectrum 21:319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz J, Griffith R, Ng J, Reinert S, Friedmann P, Moulton A (2002) Patients' use of the Internet for Medical Information. Journal of General Internal Medicine17:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley T, Falvo D, Podell R, Renner J (1996) The informed patient poses a different challenge. Patient Care 30:128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox S, Rainie L (2002) Vital decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedewald V (2000) The Internet's influence on the doctor-patient relationship. Health Management Technology 21:7980

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg M (1998) Management of localised prostate cancer: state of the art. Medical Journal of Australia 169:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg M, Wijesinha S (2007) Diagnosing prostate cancer - What GPs need to know. Australian Family Physician 36:345–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardey M (1999) Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of health knowledge and a challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness 21:820–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardey M (2002) 'The story of my illness': Personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health 6:31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines S (1999) Treating early prostate cancer: Difficult decisions abound. Patient Care 33:82–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson A (2001) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiley R (2002) Does the internet harm health? British Medical Journal 324:238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg L (1997) Online support group helps patients live with, learn more about the rare skin cancer CTCL-ML. Journal of the American Medical Association 277:1422–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader B, Muncer S, Burrows R, Pleace N, Nettleton S (2002) Medicine on the line? Computer-mediated social support and advice for people with diabetes. International Journal of Social Welfare 11:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley J, Cattermole H, Oliver C (1999) The quality of surgical information on the Internet. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 44:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S (2004) The emergence of e-scaped medicine? Sociology 38:661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton P, Goldblatt J (1998) The Internet and the changing roles of doctors, patients and families. Medical Journal of Australia 169:594–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie L, Fox S (2001) Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddin J, Sonn C (2003) Masculinity, social support, and sense of community: the men's group experience in Western Australia. The Journal of Men's Studies 11: 207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders C (2000) Where are all the men? Patient Care 34:10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K, Ernst E (2004) Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. Annals of Oncology 15:733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale C (2005) New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. Sociology of Health & Illness 27:515–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale C, Ziebland S, Charteris-Black J (2006) Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine 62:2577–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharf BF (1997) Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health 26:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh N (2000) Men are out of touch with health care system. Family Practice News 30:42

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting R (2000) A healthy way to learn: The medical community assesses online healthcare. Information Week 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziebland S (2004) The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Social Science & Medicine 59:1783–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. British Medical Journal 328:564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zrebiec J, Jacobson A (2001) What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study. Diabetic Medicine 18:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to SAGE Publications for permission to reprint the parts of this Chapter previously seen as an article published in Qualitative Health Research Vol. 15 No. 3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Broom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broom, A. (2009). The Role and Implications of the Internet in Healthcare Delivery. In: Sudweeks, F., Romm Livermore, C., Oliver, D. (eds) Self-Service in the Internet Age. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-207-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-207-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-206-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-207-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics