Abstract
Drawing on a study of the Internet usage of Australian men with prostate cancer , this chapter investigates how access to information and online support affects men’s experiences of disease and, in particular, the possible implications of Internet-informed patients for the doctor/patient relationship. The data reveal that accessing information and/or support online can have a profound effect on men’s experiences of prostate cancer, providing a method of taking some control over their disease and limiting inhibitions experienced in face-to-face encounters. However, it is also clear that some medical specialists view Internet-informed patients as a challenge to their power within medical encounters and, as a result, employ disciplinary strategies that reinforce traditional patient roles and alienate patients who use the Internet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Gleason system evaluates how effectively the cells of any particular cancer are able to structure themselves into glands resembling those of the normal prostate. The ability of a tumour to mimic normal gland architecture is called its differentiation, and a tumour whose structure is nearly normal (well differentiated) will probably have a biological behaviour that is not very aggressively malignant.
- 2.
Brachytherapy is an advanced cancer treatment. Radioactive seeds or sources are placed in or near the tumour itself, giving a high radiation dose to the tumour while reducing the radiation exposure in the surrounding healthy tissues. The term “brachy” is Greek for short distance, and brachytherapy is radiation therapy given at a short distance: localized, precise, and high-tech.
References
Ahmann E (2000) Supporting families' savvy use of the Internet for health research. Pediatric Nursing 26:419–423
AIHW (2004) Australia’s Health. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra
Anderson J, Rainey M, Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of cyberhealthcare on the physician/patient relationship. Journal of Medical Systems 27:67–84
Beisecker A, Beisecker T (1990) Patient information-seeking behaviours when communicating with doctors. Medical Care 28:19–28
Berland G, Elliot M, Morales L, Algazy J, Kravitz R, Broder M, Kanouse D, Muñoz J, Puyol J, Lara M, Watkins K, Yang H, McGlynn E (2001) Health information of the internet: accessibility, quality and readability in English and Spanish Journal of the American Medical Association 285:2612–2621
Bradlow A, Coulter A, Brooks P (1992) Patterns of referral. Oxford, Health Services Research Unit
Broom A (2004) Prostate cancer and masculinity in Australian society: A case of stolen identity? International Journal of Men’s Health 3:73–91
Broom A (2005a) Virtually he@lthy: A study into the impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor/patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research 15:325–345
Broom A (2005b) The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. Journal of Sociology 41:87–104
Broom A (2005c) Medical specialists’ accounts of the impact of the Internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health 9:319–338
Broom A (2006) The impact of the Internet on patients’ expectations. Nature Clinical Practice Urology 3:117
Broom A, Tovey, P (2008) The role of the Internet in cancer patients’ engagement with complementary and alternative cancer treatments. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 12(2):139–156.
Burrows R, Nettleton S, Pleace N, Pleace N, Muncer S (2000) Virtual community care: social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication and Society 3:95–121
Cameron E, Bernardes J (1998) Gender and disadvantage in health: men's health for a change. Sociology of Health and Illness 20:673–693
Charmaz K (1990) ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine 30:1161–1172
Cline R, Haynes K (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research 16:671–692
Cotten S (2001) Implications of Internet technology for medical sociology in the new millennium. Sociological Spectrum 21:319–340
Diaz J, Griffith R, Ng J, Reinert S, Friedmann P, Moulton A (2002) Patients' use of the Internet for Medical Information. Journal of General Internal Medicine17:180–185
Dudley T, Falvo D, Podell R, Renner J (1996) The informed patient poses a different challenge. Patient Care 30:128–138
Fox S, Rainie L (2002) Vital decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC
Friedewald V (2000) The Internet's influence on the doctor-patient relationship. Health Management Technology 21:7980
Frydenberg M (1998) Management of localised prostate cancer: state of the art. Medical Journal of Australia 169:11–12
Frydenberg M, Wijesinha S (2007) Diagnosing prostate cancer - What GPs need to know. Australian Family Physician 36:345–347
Hardey M (1999) Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of health knowledge and a challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness 21:820–835
Hardey M (2002) 'The story of my illness': Personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health 6:31–46
Hines S (1999) Treating early prostate cancer: Difficult decisions abound. Patient Care 33:82–91
Joinson A (2001) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:177–192
Kiley R (2002) Does the internet harm health? British Medical Journal 324:238
Lamberg L (1997) Online support group helps patients live with, learn more about the rare skin cancer CTCL-ML. Journal of the American Medical Association 277:1422–1424
Loader B, Muncer S, Burrows R, Pleace N, Nettleton S (2002) Medicine on the line? Computer-mediated social support and advice for people with diabetes. International Journal of Social Welfare 11:53–65
McKinley J, Cattermole H, Oliver C (1999) The quality of surgical information on the Internet. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 44:265–268
Nettleton, S (2004) The emergence of e-scaped medicine? Sociology 38:661–679
Pemberton P, Goldblatt J (1998) The Internet and the changing roles of doctors, patients and families. Medical Journal of Australia 169:594–595
Rainie L, Fox S (2001) Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC
Reddin J, Sonn C (2003) Masculinity, social support, and sense of community: the men's group experience in Western Australia. The Journal of Men's Studies 11: 207–224
Saunders C (2000) Where are all the men? Patient Care 34:10
Schmidt K, Ernst E (2004) Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. Annals of Oncology 15:733–742
Seale C (2005) New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. Sociology of Health & Illness 27:515–540
Seale C, Ziebland S, Charteris-Black J (2006) Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine 62:2577–2590
Sharf BF (1997) Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health 26:65–84
Walsh N (2000) Men are out of touch with health care system. Family Practice News 30:42
Whiting R (2000) A healthy way to learn: The medical community assesses online healthcare. Information Week 60
Ziebland S (2004) The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Social Science & Medicine 59:1783–1793
Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. British Medical Journal 328:564
Zrebiec J, Jacobson A (2001) What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study. Diabetic Medicine 18:154–158
Acknowledgments
Thanks to SAGE Publications for permission to reprint the parts of this Chapter previously seen as an article published in Qualitative Health Research Vol. 15 No. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broom, A. (2009). The Role and Implications of the Internet in Healthcare Delivery. In: Sudweeks, F., Romm Livermore, C., Oliver, D. (eds) Self-Service in the Internet Age. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-207-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-207-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-206-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-207-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)