Skip to main content

When Is a Linear Continuous-time System Easy or Hard to Control in Practice?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Recent Advances in Learning and Control

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 371))

  • 2970 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is focused on characterization of easily controllable plants in practical control applications rather than to design an optimal or a robust controller for a give plant. After explaining the background and the motivation of the research topic, we first provide two notions, namely finite frequency positive realness (FFPR) and Condition (π), which represent desirable phase/gain properties for easily controllable plants. We then show closed-form analytical expressions of best achievable \( {\cal H}_2 \) tracking and regulation performances, and we provide the connection between Condition (π) and the achievable robust performance based on \( {\cal H}_\infty \) loop shaping design procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakhtiar, T., Hara, S.: H 2 Regulation Performance Limitations for SIMO Linear Time-invariant Feedback Control Systems. Automatica (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, J., Hara, S., Chen, G.: Best tracking and regulation performance under control energy constraint. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 48(8), 1320–1336 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Freudenberg, J.S., Looze, D.P.: Right half plane zeros and poles and design tradeoffs in feedback systems. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 30(6), 555–565 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hara, S.: A unification of analytical expressions for control performance limitations via reciprocal transform. In: SSSC 2007. 3rd IFAC Symp. on System, Structure and Control (submitted, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hara, S., et al.: The Best Achievable H 2 Tracking Performances for SIMO Feedback Control Systems. J. of Control Science and Engineering (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hara, S., Kanno, M., Onishi, M.: Finite frequency phase property versus achievable control performance in \( {\cal H}_\infty \) loop shaping design. In: Proc. of SICE-ICASE Int. Joint Conf. 2006, Busan, Korea, pp. 3196–3199 (October 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasaki, T., Hara, S., Yamauchi, K.: Dynamical system design from a control perspective: Finite frequency positive-realness approach. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 48(8), 1337–1354 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanno, M., Hara, S., Onishi, M.: Characterization of Easily Controllable Plants Based on the Finite Frequency Phase/Gain Property. In: Proc. of American Control Conference 2007, New York, pp. 5816–5821 (July 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanno, M., et al.: Parametric optimization in control using the sum of roots for parametric polynomial spectral factorization. In: Proc. Int. Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 211–218 (July-August 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kanno, M., Hara, S., Anai, H., Yokoyama, K.: Sum of Roots, Polynomial Spectral Factorization, and Control Performance Limitations. In: IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, New Orleans (to be presented, December 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McFarlane, D.C., Glover, K.: Robust Controller Design Using Normalized Coprime Factor Plant Descriptions. Lecture Notes in Control and Inf. Sciences, vol. 138. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Middleton, R.H.: Trade-offs in linear control systems design. Automatica 27(2), 281–292 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Seron, M.M., Braslavsky, J.H., Goodwin, G.C.: Fundamental Limitations in Filtering and Control. Springer, London (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Skogestad, S., Postlethwaite, L.: Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vinnicombe, G.: Uncertainty and Feedback — \( {\cal H}_\infty \) Loop-shaping and the υ-gap Metric. Imperial College Press, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hara, S., Kanno, M. (2008). When Is a Linear Continuous-time System Easy or Hard to Control in Practice?. In: Blondel, V.D., Boyd, S.P., Kimura, H. (eds) Recent Advances in Learning and Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 371. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-155-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-155-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-154-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-155-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics