Skip to main content

Schuessler et al [14] were the first one to do laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 1993. Since then, several centers have published their experience. Today laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an established alternative procedure to the standard open technique in ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction [6–9].

Though morbidity in antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomies is low, the success rates are around 75% only and not suitable if there is a vessel crossing the UPJ [16].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and longterm outcome. Urol Clin North Am 25:323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eden CG, Sultana SR, Murray KH, Carruthers RK (1997) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered fibrin-glued pyeloplasty: medium term results. Br J Urol 80:382.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G (2000) Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol 14:889.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarret TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC et al (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: first 100 cases. J Urol 167:1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2003) Laparoscopic reconstructive urology. J Endourol 170:1070–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaouk JH, Kuang W, Gill IS (2002) Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique. J Urol 167:229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakada SY, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1995) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty of secondary UPJ obstruction. Urology 46:257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicol DI, Smithers DM (1994) Laparoscopic approach to the left kidney avoiding colonic mobilisation. J Urol 152:1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Notley RG, Beaugie JM (1973) The long term follow-up of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 45:464.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL (1977) Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 118:162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramalingam M, Selvarajan K, Senthil K (2005) Laparoscopic trans mesocolonic pyeloplasty—our experience in 22 patients. J Endourol 19:abstr A142.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramalingam M, Selvarajan K, Senthil K, Pai MG (2008) Transmesocolic approach to laparoscopic pyeloplasty—our 8 year experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 18:194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Recker F, Subotic B, Goepel M, Tschool R (1995) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: preliminary report. J Urol 153:1601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150:1795.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soulfe M, Salomon L, Patard J-J, et al (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 166:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al (2002) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 42:268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR (1999) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 162(3 pt 1):692–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, (2003) Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 21(3):133–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2002) Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 60(3):509–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubert J (2003) Robotic pyeloplasty. Curr Urol Rep 4(2):124–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel V (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66:45–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH (1999) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: apilot study. Urology 53(6):1099–1103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramalingam, M., Selvarajan, K., Senthil, K. (2009). Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. In: Ramalingam, M., Patel, V.R. (eds) Operative Atlas of Laparoscopic Reconstructive Urology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-151-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-151-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-150-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-151-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics