Skip to main content

Recovery from Plan Failures in Partially Observable Environments

  • Conference paper
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIV (SGAI 2007)

Abstract

The paper discusses a distributed approach to multi-agent plan execution and control, where a team of agents may perform actions concurrently in a partially observable environment. Each agent is able to supervise the execution of the actions it is responsible for by means of an on-line monitoring step and to perform agent diagnosis when a failure in the execution of an action has been detected.

The emphasis of the paper is on the mechanism for synthesizing a recovery plan in presence of an action failure. One contribution of the paper concerns an in depth analysis of the characteristics the recovery plan has to satisfy. The most stringent requirement regards that the recovery plan has to be conformant, as the partial observability of the system allows just to estimate the status of the agent and the action effects may be non deterministic.

The paper proposes an approach for synthesizing such a conformant recovery plan based on the adoption of symbolic methods. In particular, the recovery planning is implemented in terms of operations on Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams used for encoding both the belief states and the action models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Birnbaum, G. Collins, M. Freed, and B. Krulwich, ’Model-based diagnosis of planning failures’, in Proc. AAAI90, pp. 318-323, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Boutilier and R. I. Brafman, ’Partial-order planning with concurrent interacting actions’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 14, pp. 105-136 (2001).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cimatti and M. Roveri, ’Conformant Planning via Symbolic Model Checking’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 13, pp. 305-338 (2000).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Jensen and M. M. Veloso, ’OBDD-based Universal Planning for Synchronized Agents in Non-Deterministic Domains’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 13, pp. 189-226 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Kalech and G.A.Kaminka, ’Towards Model-Based Diagnosis of Coordination Failures’, in Proc. AAAI05, pp. 102-107 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Micalizio and P. Torasso, ’Recovery from Plan Failure in Partially Observable Environments: the long report’, Technical Report www.di.unito.it\ ~micalizi.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Micalizio and P. Torasso, ’Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Plans under Partial Observability’, in Proc. 18th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX07), pp. 346-353 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Micalizio, P. Torasso and G. Torta, ’Intelligent Supervision of Plan Execution in Multi-Agent Systems’ in International Transactions on Systems Science and Applications, 1(3), pp. 259-267 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Micalizio, and P. Torasso, ’On-LineMonitoring and Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Systems: a Model Based Approach’, Knowledge-Based Systems (special issue on AI 2006), 20(2), pp. 134-142 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. D. R-Moreno, G. Brat, N. Muscettola and D. Rijsman, ’Validation of a Multi-Agent Architecture for Planning and Execution’ in Proc. 18th InternationalWorkshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX07), pp. 368-374 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Pencole and M.O. Cordier, ’A formal framework for the decentralised diagnosis of large scale discrete event systems and its application to telecommunication networks’, Artificial Intelligence, 164, 121-170, (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Carver and V. Lesser, ’Domain monotonicity and the performance of local solutions strategies for cdps-based distributed sensor interpretation and distributed diagnosis’, AAMAS Journal, 6, 35-76, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Wittenven, N. Roos, R. van der Krogt, and M. deWeerdt, ’Diagnosis of single and multi-agent plans’, in Proc. AAMAS05, pp. 805-812 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Torasso, R.M.P. (2008). Recovery from Plan Failures in Partially Observable Environments. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIV. SGAI 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-094-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-094-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-093-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-094-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics