Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaging Decisions: Cardiovascular CT Versus Cardiovascular MR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cardiovascular CT

  • 1241 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/ SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48(7): 1475–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Jama 2007, 298(3): 317–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ergun I, Keven K, Uruc I, et al. The safety of gadolinium in patients with stage 3 and 4 renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21(3): 697–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007, 243(1): 148–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46(3): 552–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shellock FG. Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices: 2006 Edition. Los Angeles: Biomedical Research Publishing Group; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43(7): 1315–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL. Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005, 28(4): 270–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinbane JS, Colletti PM, Shellock FG. MR in patients with pacemakers and ICDs: Defining the issues. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007, 9(1): 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eshed I, Althoff CE, Hamm B, Hermann KG. Claustrophobia and premature termination of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(2): 401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chia JM, Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(5): 678–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Gollesch A, et al. Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J 2004, 25(14): 1230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valente AM, Powell AJ. Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease. Cardiol Clin 2007, 25(1): 97–110, vi.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dong J, Dickfeld T, Dalal D, et al. Initial experience in the use of integrated electroanatomic mapping with three-dimensional MR/CT images to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006, 17(5): 459–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC, Inoue T, Ohe Y. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166(13): 1350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006, 16(7): 1424–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006, 151(3): 736–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dewey M, Muller M, Eddicks S, et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48(10): 2034–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006, 114(22): 2334–41; quiz

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shabestari AA, Abdi S, Akhlaghpoor S, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99(12): 1656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49(9): 951–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeon SB, Sabir A, Clouse M, et al. Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary artery wall imaging: comparison with multislice computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50(5): 441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50(6): 514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007, 115(13): 1769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999, 100(19): 1992–2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006, 113(6): 823–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2003, 108(1): 54–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2007, 115(15): 2006–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48(10): 1977–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matoh F, Satoh H, Shiraki K, et al. Usefulness of delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate dilated phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail 2007, 13(5): 372–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Casolo G, Di Cesare E, Molinari G, et al. Diagnostic work up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Consensus statement. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004, 108(1–2): 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 2005, 111(2): 186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smedema JP, Snoep G, van Kroonenburgh MP, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45(10): 1683–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, Kubo S, et al. Effectiveness of delayed enhanced MRI for identification of cardiac sarcoidosis: comparison with radionuclide imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185(1): 110–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rochitte CE, Oliveira PF, Andrade JM, et al. Myocardial delayed enhancement by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Chagas' disease: a marker of disease severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46(8): 1553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. De Cobelli F, Pieroni M, Esposito A, et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic myocarditis presenting with heart failure or recurrent arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(8): 1649–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laissy JP, Hyafil F, Feldman LJ, et al. Differentiating acute myocardial infarction from myocarditis: diagnostic value of early- and delayed-perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 2005, 237(1): 75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grizzard JD, Ang GB. Magnetic resonance imaging of pericardial disease and cardiac masses. Cardiol Clin 2007, 25(1): 111–40, vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoffmann U, Globits S, Schima W, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses. Am J Cardiol 2003, 92(7): 890–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Srichai MB, Junor C, Rodriguez LL, et al. Clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics of left ventricular thrombus: a comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical or pathological validation. Am Heart J 2006, 152(1): 75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Achenbach S, Sacher D, Ropers D, et al. Electron beam computed tomography for the detection of left atrial thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart 2004, 90(12): 1477–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohrs OK, Nowak B, Petersen SE, et al. Thrombus detection in the left atrial appendage using contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186(1): 198–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Wiesmann F, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46(1): 101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Jerold S. Shinbane

Authors
  1. Jerold S. Shinbane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jabi Shriki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick M. Colletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerold S. Shinbane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Los Angeles Biomedical Res. Institute, Dept. Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, W. Carson St. 1124, Torrance, 90502, California, USA

    Matthew J. Budoff

  2. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Pablo St. 1510, Los Angeles, 90033, California, USA

    Jerold S. Shinbane

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shinbane, J.S., Shriki, J., Colletti, P.M. (2008). Imaging Decisions: Cardiovascular CT Versus Cardiovascular MR. In: Budoff, M., Shinbane, J. (eds) Handbook of Cardiovascular CT. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-091-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-091-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-091-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-092-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation