Abstract
Femoral neck fracture and aseptic loosening are the most common complications associated with modern hip resurfacing arthroplasty, occurring in 0 to 1.5% of most reported series [1–5].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shimmin AJ, Back, D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:463–464.
Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:177–184.
Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1874–1877.
Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:167–170.
Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:324–329.
Beaulé PE, Lee JL, LeDuff MJ, et al. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:2015–2021.
Beaulé P, Campbell P, Hoke R, et al. Notching of the femoral neck during surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;1:35–39.
Beaulé PE, Campbell P, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:85–96.
Nork SE, Schar M, Pfander G, et al. Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:163–170.
Morlock MM, Bishop N, Rüther W, et al. Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220: 333–344.
Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, et al The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:481–489.
Campbell P, Beaule PE, Ebramzadeh E, et al. A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:35–46.
Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Silva M, et al. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2007;25:423–431.
Chandler M, Kowalski RS, Watkins ND, et al. Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing, Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:321–331.
Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, et al. Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:16–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McMahon, S., Hawdon, G. (2009). Cementing Technique in Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. In: McMinn, D.J.W. (eds) Modern Hip Resurfacing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-087-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-088-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)