Skip to main content

Conservative total Articular Replacement Arthroplasty: Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up

  • Chapter
Modern Hip Resurfacing

Abstract

Hip joint resurfacing is an attractive concept because it preserves rather than removes the femoral head and neck and may provide better functioning. We report the first long-term follow-up on total hip resurfacing. A total of 445 patients (561 hips) were followed for a minimum of 20 years or until death; only 23 patients were lost to follow-up. Patients received a metal femoral prosthesis with a small curved stem. Three types of acetabular reconstruction were used: (i) cemented polyurethane, (ii) metal on metal, and (iii) polyethylene secured with cement or used as the liner of a two-piece porous-coated implant. Long-term results were favorable with the metal on metal combination only. None of the 121 patients (133 hips) who received a metal on metal articulation experienced failure. The failure rate with polyure-thane was 100%, and the failure rate with cemented polyethylene was 41%. Thus, although hip resurfacing using a metal on metal articulation with a curved-stemmed femoral component is a technically demanding procedure, the prosthesis is durable, and the clinical outcome is generally favorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amstutz H. Surface replacement arthroplasty. In: Amstutz HC, ed. Hip Arthroplasty Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991;295–332.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amstutz H, Beaule P, Dorey F, LeDuff M, Campbell P, Gruen T. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:28–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry D. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1979:30:183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip-a new operation. Lancet 1961; 1:1129–1132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice. New York: Springer 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark J, Freeman M, Witham D. The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:99–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark M, Lee P, Arora A, Villar R. Levels of metal ions after small and large diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:913–917.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collier J, Kennedy F, Mayor M, Townley C. The importance of stem geometry, porous coating and collar angle of femoral hip prosthesis on the strain distribution in the normal femur. Trans Soc Biomater 1983;9:96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel J, Pynsent P, McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip in patients under 55 years with osteoar-thritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:177–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman M. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;134:2–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman M, Cameron H, Brown G. Cemented double cup arthro-plasty of the hip: a 5-year experience with the ICLH prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res1978;134:45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerard Y. Hip arthroplasty by matching cups. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;134:25–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris W. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:737–755.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Head W. Total articular resufacing arthroplasty: analysis of failure in 67 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:28–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Howie D, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish B. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty: the results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:708–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huiskes R, Streus P, Van Heck J. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip: finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:474–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lilikaki A, Arora A, Villar R. Early rehabilitation comparing hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Hip Int 2005:15:189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Long J, Bartel D. Surgical variables affect mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:115–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesko J, Goodman F, Stanesco S. Total articular replacement arthroplasty: a three-to ten-year case-controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;300:168–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller M. The benefits of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;311:54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pritchett J. Success rates of the TARA hip. Am J Orthop 1998;27:658.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pritchett J, Perdue K. The neck shaft-plate shaft angle in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthop Rev 1989;28:1187–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ritter M, Lutring J, Berend M, Pierson J. Failure mechanisms of total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:110–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimmin A, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:463–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Townley C. Hemi and total articular replacement arthroplasty of the hip with a fixed femoral cup. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:869–893.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Townley C, Walker S. Intramedullary cup-stem arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961;43:602.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Treacy R, McBryde C, Pynsent P. Birmingham hip resurfacing — A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:167–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Treuting R, Waldman D, Hooten J, Schmalzried T, Barrack R. Prohibitive failure rate of the total articular replacement arthro-plasty at five to ten years. Am J Orthop 1997;27:114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vail T, Mina C, Yergler J, Pietroban R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vendiottoli P, Lavigne M, Roy A, Lusignan D. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip replacement and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 2006:16:73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;134:102–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, Biomechanical study of resurfacing arthroplasty: Finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:505–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wroblewski B, Taylor G, Siney O. Charnley low-friction arthro-plasty 19-25-year results. Orthopedics 1992;15:421–424.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pritchett, J.W. (2009). Conservative total Articular Replacement Arthroplasty: Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up. In: McMinn, D.J.W. (eds) Modern Hip Resurfacing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-087-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-088-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics