Skip to main content

Using Differing Classification Methodologies to Identify a Full Compliment of Potential Changeover Improvement Opportunities

  • Conference paper

Abstract

In recent decades industry has focussed a lot of attention on changeover performance, recognising it has to reduce changeover losses in multi-product manufacturing environments in order to remain competitive.

This paper seeks to analyse the complexity of the changeover problem and the scope of the diverse improvement opportunities which typically are present. It does so by investigating widely variable changeover classification methodologies which have been developed to date. The paper discusses how suitable elements of these existing methodologies might be combined, thereby guiding the changeover practitioner in a structured fashion to consider a full compliment of potential improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  1. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W, 1994, Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson JG, Yao AC, Girouard WF, 1994, The role of master kits in assembly operations, International Journal of Production Economics, 35, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan D, 2006, Product design and changeover, MSc. Thesis, University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Claunch JW, 1996, Set-Up-Time Reduction, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eldridge C, Mileham AR, McIntosh RI, Culley SJ, Owen GW, Newnes LB, (ed. Pinto-Ferreira JJ), 2002, Rapid changeovers-the run up problem, Proc. 18th ISPE/IFAC Int.Conf on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future, Porto, INESC Porto (Manufacturing Systems Dept), July 2002, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McIntosh RI, Culley SJ, Mileham AR, Owen GW, 2000, A critical evaluation of Shingo’s SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) Methodology, International Journal of Production Research, 38, 2377–2395.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. McIntosh RI, Culley SJ, Mileham AR, Owen GW, 2001, Improving Changeover Performance, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McIntosh RI, Owen GW, Culley SJ, Mileham AR, 2007, Changeover Improvement: Reinterpreting Shingo’s’ sMED’ Methodology, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reik MP, McIntosh RI, Culley SJ, Mileham AR, Owen GW, 2006a, A formal design for changeover methodology Part 1: theory and background, J. Proc. IMechE., Part B: J. of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 220, No 8, pp 1225–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reik MP, McIntosh RI, Culley SJ, Mileham AR, Owen GW, 2006b, A formal design for changeover methodology Part 2: methodology and case study, J. Proc. IMechE., Part B: J. of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 220, No 8, pp 1237–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimokawa K, 1994, The Japanese automobile industry, Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shingo S, 1985, A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System, Productivity Press, Portland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith D. A., 2004, Quick die change, SME.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spencer MS and Guide VD, 1995, An exploration of the components of JIT: case study and survey results, Int. J. of Operations and Production Management, 15, pp 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tickle S and Johnston B, 2001, People power: the secret weapon to high speed changeover, Conf. rapid changeover of food production lines, 13 Dec 2001, IMechE.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng MM and Piller FT, 2003, The Customer Centric Enterprise — Advances in Mass Customization and Personalization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D, 1990, The machine that changed the world, Rawson Associates, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Owen, G., Culley, S., Reik, M., McIntosh, R., Milehama, T. (2007). Using Differing Classification Methodologies to Identify a Full Compliment of Potential Changeover Improvement Opportunities. In: Loureiro, G., Curran, R. (eds) Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-975-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-976-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics