Skip to main content

Using The Delphi Technique To Establish A Robust Research Agenda For Remanufacturing

  • Conference paper
Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses

Abstract

Remanufacturing is driven by different factors (such as extended economic profits, reduced environmental loading, social inclusion and job creation) and opposed by various barriers (such as reverse logistics, customer perception, product disassembly and component inspection). This paper details the results of two research surveys that have elicited the views of academics from around the world who are involved in remanufacturing research. The studies used the Delphi Technique to calibrate the different views on this broad and “open-ended” topic. The paper explains the Delphi Technique, the development of an online Delphi survey software tool and the STEEP (Social, Technical, Economic, Environmental, and Political) structure used for the surveys. The paper describes the process of using the Delphi Technique with the panel of academics, and shows the main results from each survey along with proposals for the continuing research agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  1. WCED 1997. Our common future. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, New York, pp.43, ISBN: 019282080X.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayres & Simonis, 1993, Industrial Metabolism, University Press, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stahel, W, 2006, The Performance Economy, Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  4. King, A M, Ijomah W L, Burgess S C, McMahon C A, “Reducing Waste: Repair, Recondition, Remanufacture or Recycle?”, Sustainable Development, Volume 14, Issue 3, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seitz, M.A., Peattie, K. 2004. Meeting the Closed-Loop Challenge: The Case for Remanufacturing. California Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 74–89

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindahl M., Sundin E. & Ostlin J. 2006, Environmental Issues within the Remanufacturing Industry, Proceedings of CIRP Life Cycle Engineering, Leuven, pp 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kerr & Ryan 2001, Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing. A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 9, pp 75–81, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. King A., Miemczyk J., & Bufton D, 2006, “Photocopier remanufacturing at Xerox UK: A description of the process and consideration of future policy issues”, Chapter in Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development (Eds.: Brissaud D., Tichkiewitch S., Zwolinski P) Springer Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lund R 1985, Remanufacturing: The experience of the United States and implications for developing countries. UNDP Project Management Report No 2. World Bank Technical Paper No 31, pp 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bras & McIntosh, 1999 Product, process and organizational design for remanufacture — an overview of research Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol 15, 1999, pp 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meadows et al, 1992, Beyond the Limits: global collapse, or a sustainable future? London, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manfreda, K.L., Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V. 2002. Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication Vol. 7 No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbs, A. 1997. University of Surrey Social Research Update. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU19.html (viewed January 25th, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linstone H & Turoff M, 1975, The Delphi method, Addison-Wesley, 1975, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loveridge D et al, 1995, United Kingdom Technology Foresight Programme-Delphi Survey PREST, 1995, pp 4–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martino J, 1983 Technological forecasting for decision making, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1983, pp14–37

    Google Scholar 

  17. Advansar Ltd, Bristol UK www.advansar.co.uk (viewed 10 December 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popper R & Korte W, Xtreme EUFORIA: Combining Foresight Methods EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods-Seville 13–14 May 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

King, A., Barker, S. (2007). Using The Delphi Technique To Establish A Robust Research Agenda For Remanufacturing. In: Takata, S., Umeda, Y. (eds) Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-935-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-935-4_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-934-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-935-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics