Degrees of engagement in interactive workspaces
- 1.2k Downloads
This paper presents a new perspective of the impact of collaboration technology on the degrees of engagement and specific interaction zones in interactive workspaces. The study is at the intersection of the design of physical work spaces, i.e., bricks, rich electronic content such as video, audio, sketching, CAD, i.e., bits, and new ways people behave in communicative events, i.e., interaction. The study presents: (1) an innovative multi-modal collaboration technology, called RECALL (patented by Stanford University), that supports the seamless, real-time capture of concept generation during project brainstorming and project review sessions, (2) the deployment of RECALL in an interactive workspace that supports real project review sessions, called FISHBOWL, and (3) the observations of the impact of RECALL and the interactive workspace on degrees of engagement and interaction zones as it is deployed in the specific FISHBOWL sessions.
KeywordsCollaboration Teamwork Interaction Interactive workspace Multi-modal Multi-media technology Capture Sharing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K (1996) Analysing design activity, 1st edn. Wiley, West Sussex, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- Davenport T, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Eastman CM (1969) Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design. In: Walker DE, Norton LM (eds) Proceedings of the international joint conference on arti?cial intelligence (IJCAI’69), Washington, DC, May 1969, pp 675–699Google Scholar
- Fruchter R, Yen S (2000) RECALL in action. In: Fruchter R, Roddis K, Pena-Mora F (eds) Proceedings of the ASCE ICCCBE-VIII conference, Stanford, 14–16 August 2000Google Scholar
- Fruchter R (2001) Bricks & bits & interaction. In: Terano T, Nishida T, Namatame A, Ohsawa Y, Tsumoto S, Washio T (eds) Special issue on exploring new frontiers on arti?cial intelligence, Lecture notes on arti?cial intelligence (LNAI) vol 2253. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Goel V (1995) Sketches of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Olszweski EJ (1981) The draughtsman’s eye: late renaissance schools and styles. Cleveland Museum of Art, Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Schön DA (1983) The refiective practitioner. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stiedel RF, Henderson JM (1983) The graphic languages of engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tversky B (1999) What does drawing reveal about thinking?. In: Gero JS, Tversky B (eds) Proceedings of the conference on visual and spatial reasoning in design, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar