Skip to main content

Online and Offline Integration in Virtual Communities of Patients — an Empirical Analysis

  • Conference paper
Communities and Technologies 2007

Abstract

Virtual communities of patients (also mentioned as virtual communities in health care — VCHC) provide today mainly information and mutual support for their members. They offer information concerning diseases, treatments or new research results. Information shared among members includes experience reports on how the disease was contracted, how it affects the daily life and how to cope with it or even how to overcome it. In some VCHC, experiences with medical institutions, medics or treatments are being discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borgaonkar, M. R., G. Townson, et al. (2002). “Providing Disease-Related information worsens Health-Related Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.” Inflamm Bowel Disease 8: 264–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgetto, B. (2004). “Selbsthilfe und Gesundheit — Analysen, Forschungsergebnisse und Perspektiven,” Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dannecker, A. and U. Lechner (2004). “Virtual Communities with a Mission” in the Health Care Sector. 11th Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets (RSEEM 2004), Dublin, University College Dublin: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dannecker, A. and U. Lechner (2006). An empirical analysis of the demand for e-services for virtual communities of patients. 19th Bled eConference, Bled, Slovenia: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dannecker, A. and U. Lechner (2006). Success Factors of Communities of Patients. 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Göteborg, Göteborg University, Sweden: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Figallo, C. (1998). “Hosting Web Communities: Building Relationships, Increasing Customer Loyalty, and Maintaining a Competitive Edge,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldschmidt, P. C. (2005). “HIT and MIS: Implications of Health Information Technology and Medical Information Systems.” Communications of the ACM 48(10): 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hulstijn, J. and Y.-H. Tan (2005). Design Aspects of a Personalized Information System about Healthcare Regulations. 12th Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets (RSEEM 2005), Amsterdam, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janke, K. H., B. Klump, et al. (2005). “Determinants of life satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease.” Inflamm Bowel Disease 11(3): 272–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, A., A. Robinson, et al. (2003). “A randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a package comprising a patient-orientated, evidence-based self-help guidebook and patient-centred consultations on disease management and satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease.” Health Technology Assessment 7(28): 140.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leimeister, J. M., W. Ebner, et al. (2005). “Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients.” Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4): 101–135.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leimeister, J. M., P. Sidiras, et al. (2004). Success Factors of Virtual Communities from the Perspective of Members and Operators: An Empirical Study. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), Hawaii, IEEE Press: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McLure Wasko, M. and S. Faraj (2005). “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice.” MIS Quarterly 29(1): 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moon, J. and J. Fisher (2006). The Effectiveness of Australian Medical Portals: Are They Meeting the Health Consumers’ Needs? 19th Bled eConference, Bled, Slovenia: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nonnecke, B. and J. Preece (2001). Why Lurkers Lurk. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, Omnipress: 1521–1531.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nonnecke, B., J. Preece, et al. (2004). What Lurkers and Posters Think of Each Other. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), Hawaii, IEEE Press: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oka, T. and T. Borkman (2000). “The History, Concepts and Theories of Self-Help Groups: From an International Perspective.” The Japanese Journal of Occupational Therapy 34(7): 718–722.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pratt, W., K. Unruh, et al. (2006). “Personal Health Information Management.” Communications of the ACM 49(1): 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Preece, J. (2000). “Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Socialbilty,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Preece, J. (2004). “Etiquette online: from nice to necessary.” Communications of the ACM 47(4): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rheingold, H. (1994). “Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier,” HarperTrade.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schubert, P. (1999). “Virtuelle Transaktionsgemeinschaften im Electronic Commerce,” Josef Eul Verlag, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suler, J. (2005). “Bringing Online and Offline Living Together: The Integration Principle.” The Psychology of Cyberspace. J. Suler, www.rider.edu/suler/psycyber/integrate.html (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Timmers, P. (1998). “Business Models for Electronic Markets.” EM — Electronic Markets. The International Journal of Electronic Markets and Business Media 3: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wellmann, B. (2001). “Computer networks as social networks.” Science 293(14): 2031–2034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whittaker, S., E. Isaacs, et al. (1997). “Widening the net: workshop report on the theory and practice of physical and network communities.” SIGCHI Bull. 29(3): 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yahoo. (2005). “Health & Wellness.” Retrieved 29.04.2005, 2005, from http://health.dir.groups.yahoo.com/dir/Health_Wellness/.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dannecker, A., Lechner, U. (2007). Online and Offline Integration in Virtual Communities of Patients — an Empirical Analysis. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B.T., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds) Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-904-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-905-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics