Abstract
A new space for social science is opening within information infrastructure design projects. These are large-scale, distributed scientific collaborations with the dual goal of building community and technical resources for that community. These endeavors are complex and ambitious combinations of research, information technology deployment, and bringing together of heterogeneous communities (Finholt 2004). It is becoming increasingly common for such projects to seek out the ‘services’ of social scientists not only as researchers but also as project participants in building community, organizing collaboration or assisting in the implementation of novel technologies. These are opportunities for social science. In this paper we ask ‘how best to make use of these opportunities?’
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashmore, M. and E. Richards (1996). “The Politics of SSK: Neutrality, Commitment and Beyond.” Social Studies of Science 26(1): 219–468.
Baker, K. S. (2004). Data at Work («Good Read»). LTER DataBits Newsletter. Fall.
Baker, K. S., B. Benson, D. Henshaw, D. Blodgett, J. Porter and S. Stafford (2000). “Evolution of a Multi-Site Network Information System: the LTER Information Management Paradigm.” Bioscience 50(11): 963–983.
Baker, K. S., L. Yarmey, L. Powell and W. Sheldon (2005). “Designing a Dictionary Process: Site and Community Dictionaries.” LTER DataBits Newsletter(Spring).
Bowker, G. C. and S. L. Star (1999). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.
Collins, H. M. (2002). “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 2: 235–96.
Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for Design. CHI 2006, Montreal, Que. Can., ACM.
Finholt, T. A. (2004). “Collaboratories.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36: 73–107.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
Galison, P. L. (1997). Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Glaser, B. G. and A. Strauss (1973). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Aldine Pub. Co.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (1998). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14: 575–99.
Hobbie, J. E., S. R. Carpenter, S. R. Grimm, J. R. Gosz and T. R. Seastedt (2003). “The US Long Term Ecological Research Program.” Bioscience 53(2): 21–32.
Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: electrification in Western society. 1880–1930. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
Jirotka, M. and J. Goguen (1994). Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues. New York, Academic Press.
Keller, R. G. (2003). “GEON (GEOScience Network) — A first step in creating cyberinfrastructure for the geosciences.” Electronic Seismologist July/August.
Kenney, M. and R. Florida (1993). Beyond mass production: the Japanese system and its transfer to the U.S. New York, Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Lynch, M. and S. Cole (2005). “Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise.” Social Studies of Science 35(2): 269–311.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. New York, Harper and Brothers Publishers.
Ribes, D., K. S. Baker, F. Millerand and G. C. Bowker (2005). “Comparative Interoperability Project: Configurations of Community, Technology, Organization.” Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.
Ribes, D. and G. C. Bowker (forthcoming). “A Learning Trajectory for Ontology Development.” Information and Organizaiton: Special Issue on the Positive Lens.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals think in Action, Basic Books.
Schuler, D. and A. Namioka (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes. Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
Star, S. L. (1988). The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. Readings in Artificial Intelligence. M. Huhns and L. Gasser. Menlo Park, California, Morgan Kaufman.
Star, S. L. (1991). The Sociology of the Invisible: The Primacy of Work in the Writings of Anselm Strauss. Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. D. Maines. Hawthorne, NY, Aldine de Gruyter: p. 265.283.
Strathern, M. (2004). Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinary, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Wantage, UK, Sean Kingston Publishing.
Strauss, A. (1993). Continual Permutations of Action. New York, Aldine de Gruyter.
Vaughan, D. (1999). “The Role of the Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 29(6): 913–943.
Vinck, D., Ed. (2003). Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Woolgar, S. and D. Pawluch (1985). “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations.” Social Problems 32(3): 214–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ribes, D., Baker, K. (2007). Modes of Social Science Engagement in Community Infrastructure Design. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B.T., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds) Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-904-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-905-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)