Skip to main content

Abstract

Severe complications associated with laparoscopy are rare, but as a large number of laparoscopies are carried out each year, the impact and consequence of these complications are considerable. The complications maybe life threatening, and the consequences of damage to the bowel, major blood vessels, and urinary tract are potentially catastrophic, leading to considerable physical and emotional suffering as well as significant financial cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Phillips JM, Hulka J, Hulka B, et al. American Association of Gynecologic Laparos-copists’ 1976 membership survey. J Reprod Med. 1978;21:3–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson HB, DeStefano F, Rubin GL, et al. Deaths attributable to tubal sterilization in the United States, 1977 to 1981. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:131–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Riedel HH, Mecke H, et al. Pelviscopy/laparoscopy and its complications in Germany, 1949-1988. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:671–677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hulka J, Peterson HB, Phillips JM, et al. Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2:133–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, et al. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicenter observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104: 595–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Querleu D, Chapron C. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7:257–261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bateman BG, Kolp LA, Hoeger K. Complications of laparoscopy: operative and diagnostic. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:30–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saidi MH, Vancaillie TG, White AJ, et al. Complications of major operative laparoscopy. A review of 452 cases. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:471–476.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Härkki-Siren P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:108–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867–872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacCordick C, Lecuru F, Rizk E, et al. Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: results of a prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc. 1999;13: 57–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirhashemi R, Harlow BL, Ginsburg ES, et al. Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:327–331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Härkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Kurki T. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:94–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quasarano RT, Kashef M, Sherman SJ, et al. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:317–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leonard F, Lecuru F, Rizk E, et al. Perioperative morbidity of gynecologic laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:129–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Levy BS, Hulka JF, Peterson HB, et al. Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1993 membership survey. JAm Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:301–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mintz M. Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. J Reprod Med. 1977;18:269–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lofferf FD, Pent D. Indications, contra-indications and complications of laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1975;30:407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berqvist D, Berqvist A. Vascular injuries during gynaecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Querleu D, Chevallier L, Chapron C, Bruhat MA. Complications of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a French collaborative study. Gynaecol Endosc. 1993;2: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867–872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harkki-Siren P. The incidence of entry related laparoscopic injuries in Finland. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garry R. Laparoscopic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:89–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garry R. Towards evidence based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1198–1201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, et al. Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:461–465.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baggish MS. Analysis of 31 cases of major vessel injury associated with gynecologic laparoscopy operations. J Gynecol Surg. 2003;19:63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuzpe AA. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy. A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:485–490.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nezhat C, Childers J, Nezhat F, et al. Major retroperitoneal vascular injury during laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:480–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N. Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996; 6:367–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Crist DW, Gadacz TR. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73:265–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krebs HB. Intestinal injury in gynecologic surgery: a ten year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:509–514.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Audebert AJM. The role of microlaparoscopy for safer wall entry: incidence of umbilical adhesions according to past surgical history. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hasson HM. A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:886–887.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Penfield AJ. How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1985;30:660–663.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, et al. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 1997;84:599–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical (ASERNIP-S). A Systematic Review of the Methods Used to Establish Laparoscopic Pneumoperitoneum. Adelaide, South Australia: ASERNIP-S; 2001. ASERNIP-S Report No. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Garry R. A consensus document concerning laparoscopic entry techniques: Middlesbrough, March 19-20 1999. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:403–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reich H, Riberio SC, Rasmussen C, et al. High-pressure trocar insertion technique. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 1999;3:45–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsaltas J, Pearce S, Lawrence A, et al. Safer laparoscopic trocar entry: it’s all about pressure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:349–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McGurgan, P, O’Donovan P. Optical Verres as an entry technique. Gynaecol Endosc. 1999;8:379–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Garry R. Complications of laparoscopic entry. Gynaecol Endosc. 1997;6:319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ogah, J.A. (2008). Laparoscopic Surgery. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics