Skip to main content

Abdominal Wound Closure: How to Avoid Complications

  • Chapter
Complications in Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

Closing an abdominal incision is one of the commonest and simplest procedures performed by gynecologists and obstetricians. Most wounds heal uneventfully, but failures, particularly in the fascial layer, cause distress to the patient, increase length of hospital stay, and can endanger life. Closure of the abdominal wound is not widely discussed in the gynecological literature, and this chapter aims to provide up-to-date information for the practicing clinician on how to minimize wound failure and how to deal with it when it occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV. Midline or transverse laparotomy? A randomised controlled clinical trial. Part 1: influence on healing. Br J Surg. 1980;67:188–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendrix SL, Schimp V, Joy M, et al. The legendary superior strength of the Pfan-nenstiel incision: a myth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1446–1451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward KL, Hilton P. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2002; 325:67–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Remmert KS, et al. The low transverse pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg. 1997;225: 365–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols DH. Incisions In: Nichols DH, ed. Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St Louis: Mosby; 1993:165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rappaport WD, Hunter GC, Allen R, et al. The effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Am J Surg. 1990;160:618–620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Peritoneal Closure. Green Top Guideline No. 15. July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weiland DE, Bay C, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998;176:666–670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgson NCF, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial wound closure. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson MA, Condon RE. Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomised trial. Am Surg. 1995;61:980–983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. VanGeldere D. One hundred years of abdominal wound dehiscence and nothing has changed. Hernia. 2000;4;302–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niggebrugge AHP, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, et al. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study. Lancet. 1999;353:1563–1567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Valle GO, Combs P, Qualls C, et al. Does closure of Camper fascia reduce the incidence of post-Cesarean superficial wound dehiscence? Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80: 1013–1016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cetin A, Cetin M. Superficial wound dehiscence after Cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of the superficial tissue. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;57:17–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allaire AD, Fisch J, McMahon MJ. Subcutaneous drain versus suture in obese women undergoing Cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:327–331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kore S, Vyavaharkar M, Akolekar R, et al. Comparison of closure of subcutaneous tissue versus non-closure in relation to wound disruption after abdominal hysterectomy in obese women. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:26–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trimbos JB, Smeets M, Verdel M, Hermans J. Cosmetic results of lower midline laparotomy wounds: polybutester and nylon skin suture in a randomised control trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:390–393.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bang RL, Mustafa MD. Comparative study of skin wound closure with polybutester (Novafil) and polypropylene. J R Coll SurgEdinb. 1989;34:295–297.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ranabaldo CJ, Rowe-Jones DC. Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. BrJSurg. 1992;79:1172–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997;42:627–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernard L, Doyle J, Friedlander SF, et al. A prospective comparison of octylcyano-acrylate tissue adhesive (dermabond) and suture for the closure of excision of wounds in children and adolescents. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1177–1180.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Clarke RE, et al. Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate multicenter randomised controlled trial. J Fam Pract. 2002;51: 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maartense S, Bemelman WA, Dunker MS, et al. Randomised study of the effectiveness of closing laparoscopy trocar wounds with octylcyanoacrylate, adhesive pap-ertape or poliglecaprone. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1370–1375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cliby W. Abdominal incision wound breakdown. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:507–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dodson MK, Magann EF, Meeks GR. A randomised comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:321–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dodson MK, Magann EF, Sullivan DL, et al. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:142–145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chua Patel CT, Kinsey GC, Koperski-Moen KJ, et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure. Am J Nurs. 2000;10:45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72:70–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hogston, P. (2008). Abdominal Wound Closure: How to Avoid Complications. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics