Skip to main content

Complications in Hysteroscopic Surgery: Prevention and Management

  • Chapter
  • 887 Accesses

Abstract

There is little doubt that minimal-access surgery (MAS) presents many advantages over conventional surgery: smaller scars, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and speedier recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Overton C, Hargreaves J, Maresh M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction techniques for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques-Laser, Endothermal or Endoresection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1351–1359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the RCOG Working Party on Training in Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgery. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, Ginsburg ES. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:517–520.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the Audit Committee’s Working Group on Communication Standards Gynaecology: Surgical Procedures. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asch R, Studd J. Progress in reproductive medicine. In: Nezhat et al., eds. New York: Pantheon Publishing; 1998:57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loffer FD. Preliminary experience with the VersaPoint bipolar resectoscope using a vaporizing electrode in a saline distending medium. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:498–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia E, Feng L, Duan H. Combination of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in gynecologic operation: an analysis of 65 cases. Chin MedJ. 1998;111:1001–1003.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crane JM, Healey S. Use of misoprostol before hysteroscopy: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:373–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hulka J, Peterson H, Phillips J, Surrey M. Operative hysteroscopy. AAGL 1993 membership survey. J.A.A.G.L. 1995;2:133–136.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manager D, Gerson JI, Wallweiner D, et al. Pulmonary oedema and coagulopathy due to Hyskon. Anesth Analg. 1989;68:686–687.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim AH, Keltz MD, et al. Dilutional hyponatraemia during hysteroscopic myomec-tomy with sorbitol-mannitol distension media. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2:237–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor H. How to avoid complications at hysteroscopic surgery. In: Bonnar J, ed. Recent Advances in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 20th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1997:134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allweiner D, et al. Addition of ethanol to the distension medium in surgical hysteroscopy as a screening test to prevent “fluid overload.“ Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1996;56:462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamou J, Fryman R, McLucas B, Garry R. A uterine distension system to prevent fluid intravasation during hysteroscopic surgery. Gynecol Endosc. 1996;5:131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loffer FD, Bradley LD, Brill AL, Brooks PG, Cooper JM. Hysteroscopic fluid monitoring guidelines. The ad hoc committee on hysteroscopic training guidelines of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:167–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGurgan, P., O’Donovan, P. (2008). Complications in Hysteroscopic Surgery: Prevention and Management. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics