Skip to main content

The High-Risk Gynecology Patient: Assessment and Management

  • Chapter
Complications in Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

Modern surgical, anaesthetic, and nursing care has increased the safety of gynecological surgery. Clinicians as well as patients may consider it to be routine, with very low risk. However, for a small cohort of patients the physiological insult of surgery exposes them to significant risks of morbidity and mortality; these patients are usually elderly, often with malignancy or cardio-pulmonary comorbidities, and having major or emergency surgery. The leading causes of intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission in postoperative gynecology patients are hemorrhage, infection, and cardiorespiratory failure, and in these patients the 6-month mortality is 26% [1]. For those age >69 years having major open procedures, the 60-day mortality rate is up to 5% [2]. The challenge remains to accurately identify those patients who have the highest risk, to stratify their level of risk, and to modify management to ameliorate the hazards. Doing so facilitates the benefits of surgery for a group of patients for whom it may previously have been denied. In any healthcare system with limited resources, it is imperative that such resources are targeted appropriately toward those with the highest risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heinonen S, Tyrvainen E, Penttinen J, et al. Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population based analysis. Crit Care. 2002;6:371–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB. Role of oxygen debt in the development of organ failure, sepsis and death in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 1992;102: 208–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bland RD, Shoemaker WC, Abraham E, et al. Haemodynamic and oxygen transport patterns in surviving and non-surviving postoperative patients. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett-Guerrero E. Automated detection of gastric luminal partial pressure of CO2. Anaesthesiology. 2000;92:38–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roumen RM, Hendriks T, van der Ven Jongekrijg J, et al. Cytokine patterns after major vascular surgery, hemorrhagic shock, and severe blunt trauma: relationship with subsequent ARDS and MOF. Ann Surg. 1993;218:769–776.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman L, Calera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiovascular risk in non cardiac surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845–850.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLauchlin JR. Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:211–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major non-cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for non cardiac surgery: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:542–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smetana GW, Lawrence AL, Cornell JE. Pre-operative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:581–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Talaat AS, Das N, Athavale R. Evaluation of P-POSSUM scoring system in patients undergoing gynaecological oncology surgery. IntJ Gynaecol Cancer. 2004;14(suppl): 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grish M, Trayner E, Dammann O, et al. Symptom limited stair climbing as a predictor of post-operative cardiopulmonary complications after high risk surgery. Chest. 2001;120:1147–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reilly DF, Mcneely MJ, Doerner D, et al. Self reported exercise tolerance and the risk of serious perioperative complications. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2185–2192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Older P, Hall A, Hader R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest. 1999;116: 355–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1789–1794.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Devereaux PJ, Scott Beatie W, Choi PTL, et al. How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative β-blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 2005;331:313–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuhmeier KD, Mainzer Cierpka J, et al. Small oral dose of clonidine reduces the incidence of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia in patients having vascular surgery. Anaesthesiology. 1996;85:706–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 1988;94:1176–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. Br Med J. 1999;318:1099–1103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander C, Liston W. Operating on the obese woman-a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:1167–1172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gan TJ, Horaek A, Maroof M, et al. Intraoperative volume expansion guided by esophageal doppler improved postoperative outcome and shortens hospital stay. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:820–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of doppler-optimised fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1069–1076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moraca RJ, Sheldon DG, Thirlby RC. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practise. Ann Surg. 2003;238:663–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised controlled trial. Crit Care. 2005;9:687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cutillo G, Maneschi F, Franchi M, et al. Early feeding compared with nasogastric decompression after major oncologic gynaecologic surgery: a randomised study. Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;93:41–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glover, G.W., Cramp, P.G. (2008). The High-Risk Gynecology Patient: Assessment and Management. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics