Skip to main content

Use of Stress Testing for the Risk Stratification of Patients at Low to Intermediate Event Risk According to the PAIN Pathway Algorithm

  • Chapter
Acute Coronary Syndrome

Coronary artery disease is a progressive disease with a wide range of clinical presentations. In some individuals, the development of angina is the fi rst warning sign, but in others, acute coronary syndrome, unheralded myocardial infarction, or sudden death is the initial clinical presentation. The atherosclerotic fi ndings that correspond with these clinical presentations also vary widely. For example, it has been demonstrated that among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, approximately 30%of such patients have triple-vessel disease, 30% have double-vessel disease, 30% have single-vessel disease, and approximately 10% are without evidence of signifi cant atherosclerotic narrowing [1–3]. Moreover, various studies have demonstrated that anginal symptoms and inducible myocardial ischemia are not tightly coupled. Patients with typical angina frequently do not manifest inducible ischemia, and conversely, patients with inducible ischemia often do not manifest chest pain (i.e., they manifest “silent ischemia”) [4, 5]. For these reasons, the astute clinician learns not to rely solely on clinical evaluation in the workup and follow-up of patients who present with chest pain. Rather, objective measures of cardiac risk, such as the degree of abnormality during cardiac stress testing, is used by clinicians as a decision guide for the clinical management of patients who present with clinical symptoms.

Making a correct diagnosis in the setting of new-onset chest pain is especially important because the a priori risk for signifi cant atherosclerosis is higher in such patients and because progression to very early myocardial revasculariza-tion is very important for those having chest pain due to unstable or ruptured atherosclerotic plaque. Accordingly, the St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center “chest pain pathway” is designed to implement a rapid-response approach to patients presenting to our hospital with acute chest pain. This pathway includes specifi c indications for the immediate referral to our cardiac catheterization laboratory for those with acute chest pain. These include the immediate referral of patients who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or have prolonged chest pain in association with ST changes and/or increase in cardiac enzymes. This pathway has the acronym PAIN, and it is described at length in Chapter 2. Patients with low to intermediate risk of cardiac events by our pathway include patients with transient chest pain without defi nitive ST changes or elevations in cardiac enzymes and without signs of new heart failure or hemodynamic instability (see Chapters 12 and 13).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1879–1887.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 1994;89:1545–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338: 1785–1792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein J, Chao SY, Berman DS, Rozanski A. Is “silent” myocardial ischemia really as severe as symptomatic ischemia? The analytic effect of patient selection biases. Circulation 1994;89:1958–1966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krantz DS, Hedges SM, Gabbay FH, et al. Triggers of angina and ST-segment depression in ambulatory coronary artery disease patients: evidence for an uncoupling of angina and ischemia. Am Heart J 1994;128:703–712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ladenheim ML, Pollack BH, Rozanski A, et al. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as orthogonal indices of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:464–471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmarian JJ, Dakik HA, Filipchuk NG. An initial strategy of intensive medical therapy is comparable to that of coronary revascularization for suppression of scintigraphic ischemia in high-risk but stable survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2458–2467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dakik HA, Hwang WS, Jafar A, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative stress myo-cardial perfusion imaging in unstable angina patients with negative cardiac enzymes and no new ischemic ECG changes. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:32–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stratmann HG, Tamesis BR, Younis LT, et al. Prognostic value of predischarge dipyridamole technetium 99 m sestamibi myocardial tomography in medically treated patients with unstable angina. Am Heart J 1995;130:734–740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson RS, Watson DD, Craddock GB, et al. Prediction of cardiac events after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a prospective study comparing predischarge exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy and coronary angiography. Circulation 1983;68: 321–336.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmarian JJ, Shaw LJ, Filipchuk NG, et al. A multinational study to establish the value of early adenosine technetium-99 m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in identifying a low-risk group for early hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2448–2457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laudon DA, Vukov LF, Breen JF, et al. Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin VV, Balogh T, Rich S. Utility of electron beam computed tomography to stratify patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:327–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Prevalence of noncalcifi ed coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for signifi cant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:312–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uretsky, S., Cohen, R.E., Rozanski, A. (2008). Use of Stress Testing for the Risk Stratification of Patients at Low to Intermediate Event Risk According to the PAIN Pathway Algorithm. In: Hong, M.K., Herzog, E. (eds) Acute Coronary Syndrome. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-868-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-869-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics