Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock

  • Chapter
Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction [1, 2]. Cardiogenic shock is characterized by a state of inadequate tissue perfusion due to cardiac dysfunction and is classically manifested by systemic hypotension and end-organ hypoperfusion in the setting of adequate or elevated left ventricular fi lling pressures. The hemody-namic defi nition includes sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a decrease >30 mm Hg or more in mean arterial pressure from baseline for at least 30 minutes) and a reduced cardiac index (<2.2 L min−1 m −2) [3]. In the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for car-diogenic shocK (SHOCK) Trial [4], tissue hypoperfusion was defined as cold peripheries (extremities colder than core), oliguria (<30 mL/h), or both. Subjects requiring pharmacological or mechanical circulatory support to maintain blood pressure are also included in this category.

In the setting of an acute myocardial infarction, hypotension, tachycardia, peripheral vasoconstriction, decreased urine output, and altered mentation are all manifestations of the syndrome, which can range from “preshock” to fully developed pump failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, et al. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;340(15):1162–1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hands ME, Rutherford JD, Muller JE, et al. The in-hospital development of cardio-genic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. The MILIS Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14(1):40–46; discussion 47–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Forrester JS, Diamond G, Chatterjee K, et al. Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets (fi rst of two parts). N Engl J Med 1976;295(24):1356–1362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 1999;341(9):625–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Menon V, Slater JN, White HD, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry. Am J Med 2000;108(5):374–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes DR Jr, Bates ER, Kleiman NS, et al. Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(3):668–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasdai D, Harrington RA, Hochman JS, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade and outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3):685–692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes DR Jr, Berger PB, Hochman JS, et al. Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation 1999;100(20):2067–2073.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2005;294(4):448–454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction-etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leor J, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure on admission: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. SPRINT Study Group. Am J Med 1993;94(3):265– 273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alonso DR, Scheidt S, Post M, et al. Pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock. Quanti-fi cation of myocardial necrosis, clinical, pathologic and electrocardiographic correlations. Circulation 1973;48(3):588–596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Page DL, Caulfi eld JB, Kastor JA, et al. Myocardial changes associated with cardio-genic shock. N Engl J Med 1971;285(3):133–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Webb JG, Sleeper LA, Buller CE, et al. Implications of the timing of onset of cardio-genic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1084–1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hochman J, Palazzo A, Holmes DR. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocar-dial infarction. In: Braunwald E, Califf RM, eds. Atlas of heart disease acute myo-cardial infarction and other acute ischemic syndromes. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Current Medicine; 2001: pp. 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Menon V, Hochman JS. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myo-cardial infarction. Heart 2002;88(5):531–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Correlates of one-year survival in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: angiographic fi ndings from the SHOCK trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(8):1373–1379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunnar RM, Bourdillon PD, Dixon DW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (subcommittee to develop guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). Circulation 1990;82(2):664–707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfisterer M, Cox JL, Granger CB, et al. Atenolol use and clinical outcomes after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: the GUSTO-I experience. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA (alteplase) for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(3):634–640.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Executive summary; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004;110(9): 588–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates ER, et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1123–1129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen JM, DeRose JJ, Slater JP, et al. Improved survival rates support left ventricular assist device implantation early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(7):1903–1908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leshnower BG, Gleason TG, O'Hara ML, et al. Safety and efficacy of left ventricular assist device support in postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81(4):1365–1370; discussion 1370–1361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SJ, Nguyen DQ, Bank AJ, et al. Left ventricular assist device bridge therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69(4):1146–1151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arusoglu L, Reiss N, Morshuis M, et al. [Implantation of CardioWest total artificial heart in irreversible acute myocardial infarction shock-new hope for patients with infaust prognosis.] Z Kardiol 2003;92(11):916–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revas-cularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 2005;112(13):1992–2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Slater J, Brown RJ, Antonelli TA, et al. Cardiogenic shock due to cardiac free-wall rupture or tamponade after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardio-genic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1117–1122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Menon V, Webb JG, Hillis LD, et al. Outcome and profi le of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1110–1116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong SC, Sanborn T, Sleeper LA, et al. Angiographic fi ndings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coro-naries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1077–1083.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palazzo, A., Bangalore, S., Tamis-Holland, J.E., Chorzempa, A. (2008). Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock. In: Hong, M.K., Herzog, E. (eds) Acute Coronary Syndrome. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-868-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-869-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics