Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disability and Assistive Technology Systems

  • Chapter
Book cover Assistive Technology for Visually Impaired and Blind People

Abstract

The social model of disability is discussed highlighting the recent pre-eminence achieved over the medical model of disability. The concept of “quality of life” indices is explored and its relevance to assessing assistive technology applications is described. A survey of the main assistive technology quality of life procedures is presented and the value of the individual procedures considered.

The later sections of the chapter investigate whether assistive technology can be described in a single holistic and generic model, the idea being that the model will provide a uniform and consistent framework for analysing existing applications and for creating or synthesizing new assistive technology systems. The new comprehensive assistive technology (CAT) model is presented and its use demonstrated in these sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrich, R., 2002, The SCAI instrument: measuring costs of individual assistive technology programmes, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C., 1994, Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation, Hurst & Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckie, T.M. and Hayduk, L.A., 1997, Measuring quality of life, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 42, pp. 21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. 1995, Measuring Disease: A Review of disease Specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, pp. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. and Windsor, J., 1999, Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life, J. Happiness Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisenden, S., 1986, Independent living and the medical model of disability, Disability, Handicap and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J.P., O’Boyle, C.A., McGee, H.M., Joyce, C.R., McDonald, N.J., O’Malley, K., and Hiltbrunner, B., 1994, Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly, Qual. Life Res., Vol. 3, pp. 235–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calman, K.C., 1984, Quality of life in cancer patients - an hypothesis, J. Med. Ethics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A.M. and Hussey, S.M., 2002, Assistive Technology: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition, Mosby Inc., St. Louis, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, L., 1996, User involvement in the systems design process- a practical guide for users, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, H. and Jutai, J., 1996, Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices; the PIADS. Canadian J. Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, H., Jutai, J. and Campbell, K.A., 2002, Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead, Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 1/2/3, pp. 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., Wessels, R.D., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, B. and de Whitte, L.P., 1999a, An international content validation of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST), Occupational Therapy International, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., Ska, B, Giroux, F and Weiss-Lambrou, R., 1999b, Stability and reproducibility of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST), J. Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R. and Ska, B., 2000, Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST), Assistive Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 96–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R and Ska, B., 2002a, The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D.L. and Wolfson, C., 2002b, Reliability, validity and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis, Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 1–3, pp. 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRuyter, F., 1997, The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems, Technology and Disability, Vol. 6, pp. 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., 1984, Subjective wellbeing, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 95, pp. 542–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doward, L.C. and McKenna, S.P., 2004, Defining patient-reported outcomes. Value in Health, Vol. 7, Supplement 1, pp. S4–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn W., Foto M., Hinojosa J., Schell B., Thomson L.K. and Hertfelder S., 1994, Uniform terminology for occupational-therapy - 3rd Edn. Am. J. of Occup. Therapy, Vol. 48, No. 11, pp. 1047–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn W., Foto, M., Hinojosa J., Schell B., Thomson L.K. and Hertfelder, S., 1995, Uniform terminology for occupational therapy - 3rd Edn., Am. J. Occup. Therapy, Vol. 49, No. 4, p. 371

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. and Diener, E., 2004, Global judgments of subjective wellbeing: situational variability and long-term stability, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 65, pp. 245–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouygerollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S.A. and St-Michel, G., 1998, Social consequences of long-term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M.J., 1996, The subjective wellbeing of people with spinal cord injury: relationships to impairment, disability and handicap, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Vol. 75, pp. 633–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M.J., 2000, Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome, Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M.J., Rintala, D.H., Hart, K.A., Clearman, R. and Young, M.E., 1992, Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 73, pp. 552–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Scherer, M.J. and DeRuyter, F., 2003, A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes, Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 25, No. 22, pp. 1243–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom, G.J. and de Witte, L.P., 2002, The assessment of assistive technology, outcomes, effects and costs, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T.M. and Feinstein, A.R., 1997, A critical appraisal of the problem of quality of life in medicine, J. American Medical Association, Vol. 278, pp. 619–626

    Google Scholar 

  • HEART, 1995, Line C Rehabilitation technology service delivery systems in Europe, Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, M.A., 2006, Mathematical Modelling for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, A.M., Bury, G., O’Boyle, C.A., Bradley, F., O’Kelly, F.D., and Shannon, W., 1996, A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS, BMJ, Vol. 313, pp. 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., Heang, B., Kim, J. Eisenman, L.T. and Killian, D.J., 1995, Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures, Am. J. on Mental Retardation. Vol. 99, No. 6, pp. 623–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutai, J. and Day, H., 2002, Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS), Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.O. and Curry, J., 1977, The treatment of missing data in multivariable analysis, Social. Meth. Res., Vol. 6, pp. 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A., 1968, Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd Edition, Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, I., and Newell, C., 1996, Measuring Health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountain, L.A., Campbell, S.E., Seymour, D.G., Primrose, W.R. and Whyte, M.I., 2004, Assessment of individual quality of life using the SEIQoL-DW in older Patients, Q. J. Med. Vol. 97, pp. 519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P. and Vincent, C., 2002, The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, C.A., McGee, H., Hickey, A., O’Malley, K., Joyce, C.R.B., 1992, Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement Lancet, vol. 339, pp. 1088–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle C.A., McGee, H., Hickey, A., Joyce, C.R.B., Brown, J., O’Malley, K., 1993, The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life, User manual, Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B., and Zhao, H., 1993, Predictors of assistive technology abandonment, Assistive Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, D., and Richardson, S, 1998, USERfit – a framework for user-centred design in assistive technology, Technology and Disability, Vol. 9, pp. 163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P., and Bowser, G., 1998, Education tech points: a framework for assistive technology planning and systems change in schools, CSUN Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J., 1998, Towards a methodology for the design of multimedia public access interfaces, J. of Information Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki, D.S., 2002, Improving community indicator systems: injecting more social science into the folk movement, Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R.L., 1996, Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life, In R. L. Schalock, and G. N. Siperstein (Eds.), Quality Of Life Volume I: Conceptualization and Measurement pp. 123–139, American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.J., 2000. Living in the State of Stuck: How Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities, 3rd. Edition, Broodline Books, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.J., and Craddock, G., 2002, Matching Person and Technology (MPT) assessment process, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.J., and Cushman, L., 2000, Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries, Psychological Reports, Vol. 87, pp. 981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.J., and Glueckauf, R., 2005, Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation, Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 2, 132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S.E., and Patrick, A., 1997, Understanding and assessing consumer satisfaction in rehabilitation, J. Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, Vol. 1, pp. 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, M.L., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., and Gregory, W.M., 1988, Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?, British J. of Cancer, Vol. 57, pp. 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.O., 1996, Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation, Assistive Technology, Vol. 8, pp. 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.O., 2002, OTFACT: Multilevel performance-oriented software with an assistive technology outcomes assessment protocol, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangers, M.A.G., and Aaronson, N.K., 1992, The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients which chronic disease: a review. J. Clin. Epidemiol., Vol. 45, pp. 745–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., French, S., and Cameron, C., 2003, Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • UPIAS, 1976, Fundamental Principles of Disability, London: UPIAS (Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, R., Persson, J., Lorentsen, O., Andrich, R., Farrario, M., Oortwijn, W., VanBeekum, T., Brodin, H., and de Witte, L., 2002, IPPA; Individually prioritised problem assessment, Technology and Disability, Vol. 14, pp. 141–145

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, 1980, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, 2001, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • WWW1, 2006, http://www.qolid.org/

  • Zabala, J., 1998, Ready, SETT, Go! Online Workshop,

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www2.edc.org/NCIP/Workshops/sett/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    Marion A. Hersh

  2. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Michael A. Johnson

Authors
  1. Marion A. Hersh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael A. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT, Glasgow, UK

    Marion A. Hersh

  2. Industrial Control Centre, Graham Hills Building, University of Strathclyde, 50 George Street, G1 1QE, Glasgow, UK

    Michael A. Johnson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hersh, M., Johnson, M. (2008). Disability and Assistive Technology Systems. In: Hersh, M., Johnson, M. (eds) Assistive Technology for Visually Impaired and Blind People. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-867-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-867-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-866-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-867-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation