Skip to main content

Introduction to Multiple Attribute Decision-making (MADM) Methods

  • Chapter
Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barzilai J, Lootsma FA (1994) Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Symposium on the AHP, George Washington University, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Gear T (1983) On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11:228–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114:1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making-methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Csáki P, Rapcsák T, Turchányi P, Vermes M (1995) Research and development for group decision aid in Hungary by WINGDSS, a Microsoft Windows based group decision support system. Decision Support Systems 14:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng H, Yeh CH, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research 27: 963–973

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer RF, Forman EH (1992) Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems 8:99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W, Newman JR, Snapper K, Seaver D (1982) Multiattribute Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2004) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1967) Additive utilities with incomplete product set: applications to priorities and assignments. Operations Research Society of America, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman E, Penewati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108:165–169

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gal T (1999) Multicriteria decision making:advances in MCDM models algorithms, theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon KP (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jaganathan S, Erinjeri JJ, Ker JI (2006) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0446-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiesielewicz M, Uden EV (2004) Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research 31:713–719

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lai VS, Bo KW, Cheung W (2002) Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research 137:134–144

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lai YJ, Liu TY, Hwang CL (1994) TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research 76:486–500

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lootsma FA (1999) Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement. Applied Optimization Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DW, Starr MK (1969) Executive decisions with operations research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson DL (1996) Decision aids for selection problems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 17:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2003) Fuzzy multicriteria model for post-earthquake land-use planning. Natural Hazards Review 4:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156:445–455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research 178:514–529

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP. RWS Publications, Pittsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1947) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E and Sanchez (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decision Sciences 28:151–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Tsaur SH, Laiw YD, Opricovic S (2002) Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei:public preferences and improvement strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 65:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Teng MH, Chen JJ, Opricovic S (2002) Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management 21:171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Lin CW, Opricovic S (2005) Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy 33:1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science 19:936–946

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zanakis S, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107:507–529

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Introduction to Multiple Attribute Decision-making (MADM) Methods. In: Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-819-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-819-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-818-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-819-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics