Abstract
In order to achieve the strategic goals, the company should utilise an efficient data gathering and analysis system for mapping the technical and economic situation, following up the development and detecting technical and economic deviations at an early stage to plan and perform necessary maintenance actions on time. In many cases, measuring and following up the development of relevant and well selected technical and economic performance measures can be more applicable for mapping the situation and making cost-effective decisions compared with monitoring big mount of data. But, in many cases it demands a reliable technique for interpretation of the behaviour of these performance measures especially if they are not linearly interrelated and if some of them reflect a combination of technical and financial impact. The problem addressed in this paper is; how is it possible to enhance the ability of detecting significant deviations in the maintenance performance measures at an early stage and tracing their root causes by using data- and knowledge base and inference engine? The major result achieved in this paper is a model developed for interpreting the changes in the maintenance performance measures and tracing their basic causes, which is verified in an example with typical data. The model consists of five modules; what performance measures to chose, how and why an eventual deviation on the performance measures occur, what to do to eliminate and prevent their reoccurrence and mapping of the current situation technically and financially. The main conclusion is that applying the model would enhance the ability of detecting changes in the maintenance performance through identifying the causes for elimination. In Al- Najjar et al (2004), a model for how to identify the measurable variables, which are needed to develop measures for monitoring maintenance performance behaviour systematically, is introduced and discussed. Also, five maintenance performance measures are proposed and applied. Furthermore, an additional model manual analysis of the trend of maintenance performance measures, for an overall assessment of the company’s situation, is presented. In this paper, the idea of manual analysis presented in Al-Najjar et al (2004) is systemised.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
6 References
Al-Najjar, B, Hanson, M.O, Sunnegårdh, P., (2004). Benchmarking of Maintenance Performance: A Case Study in two manufacturers of furniture
Al-Najjar, B (1997), Condition Based Maintenance: Selection and Improvement of a cost-effective vibration based policy in rolling element bearings. Doctoral thesis, ISSN 0280-722X, ISNR LUTMDN/TMIO-1006-SE, ISBN 91-628-2545-X, Lund University, Inst of Industrial Engineering, Sweden.
Al-Najjar, B. and Kans, M (2005). A Model to Identify Relevant Data for Accurate Problem Tracing and Localisation, and Cost-effective Decisions: A Case Study. To be published
Kans, M. (2005). On the identification and utilisation of relevant data applying cost-effective maintenance. Report, no 14 (Tekn. Lic.), School of Technology and Design, Växjö University, Sweden
Kaplan, R.S and Norton. D.P (2004), “Strategy Maps-converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, ISBN 1-50139-134-2, USA
Kennerley M and Neely A (2003) “Measuring performance in a changing business environment”, International journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.23, No. 2, pp. 213–229
Nonaka, I (1991) “Harvard Business Review on Knowledge management”, Harvard Business School Press
Pintelon, L, & Van Puyvdelde, F, (1997) “ Maintenance Performance Reporting Systems: Some Experiences”, Central for Industrial Management, Leuve, Belgium and Glaverbel, Mol, Belgium, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Vol 3 No 1, 1997, pp, 4–15.
Turban, E, & Aronson, J, (1997), “Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems”, 5th edition, Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
Sherwin, D (2000), “A Review of Overall Models for Maintenance Management”, Journal of Quality in Management, Vol. 6 No. 3. 2000. pp. 138–164.
Waeyenbergh, G, Pintelon, L (2002), “A Framework for Maintenance Concept Development”, International Journal of Production Economics, pp.299–313
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 CIEAM/MESA
About this paper
Cite this paper
Al-Najjar, B. (2006). A Model to Diagnose the Deviation in the Maintenance Performance Measures. In: Mathew, J., Kennedy, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Anderson, D. (eds) Engineering Asset Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-583-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-814-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)