Skip to main content

A Model to Diagnose the Deviation in the Maintenance Performance Measures

  • Conference paper
Engineering Asset Management

Abstract

In order to achieve the strategic goals, the company should utilise an efficient data gathering and analysis system for mapping the technical and economic situation, following up the development and detecting technical and economic deviations at an early stage to plan and perform necessary maintenance actions on time. In many cases, measuring and following up the development of relevant and well selected technical and economic performance measures can be more applicable for mapping the situation and making cost-effective decisions compared with monitoring big mount of data. But, in many cases it demands a reliable technique for interpretation of the behaviour of these performance measures especially if they are not linearly interrelated and if some of them reflect a combination of technical and financial impact. The problem addressed in this paper is; how is it possible to enhance the ability of detecting significant deviations in the maintenance performance measures at an early stage and tracing their root causes by using data- and knowledge base and inference engine? The major result achieved in this paper is a model developed for interpreting the changes in the maintenance performance measures and tracing their basic causes, which is verified in an example with typical data. The model consists of five modules; what performance measures to chose, how and why an eventual deviation on the performance measures occur, what to do to eliminate and prevent their reoccurrence and mapping of the current situation technically and financially. The main conclusion is that applying the model would enhance the ability of detecting changes in the maintenance performance through identifying the causes for elimination. In Al- Najjar et al (2004), a model for how to identify the measurable variables, which are needed to develop measures for monitoring maintenance performance behaviour systematically, is introduced and discussed. Also, five maintenance performance measures are proposed and applied. Furthermore, an additional model manual analysis of the trend of maintenance performance measures, for an overall assessment of the company’s situation, is presented. In this paper, the idea of manual analysis presented in Al-Najjar et al (2004) is systemised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  1. Al-Najjar, B, Hanson, M.O, Sunnegårdh, P., (2004). Benchmarking of Maintenance Performance: A Case Study in two manufacturers of furniture

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Najjar, B (1997), Condition Based Maintenance: Selection and Improvement of a cost-effective vibration based policy in rolling element bearings. Doctoral thesis, ISSN 0280-722X, ISNR LUTMDN/TMIO-1006-SE, ISBN 91-628-2545-X, Lund University, Inst of Industrial Engineering, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Najjar, B. and Kans, M (2005). A Model to Identify Relevant Data for Accurate Problem Tracing and Localisation, and Cost-effective Decisions: A Case Study. To be published

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kans, M. (2005). On the identification and utilisation of relevant data applying cost-effective maintenance. Report, no 14 (Tekn. Lic.), School of Technology and Design, Växjö University, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan, R.S and Norton. D.P (2004), “Strategy Maps-converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, ISBN 1-50139-134-2, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kennerley M and Neely A (2003) “Measuring performance in a changing business environment”, International journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.23, No. 2, pp. 213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nonaka, I (1991) “Harvard Business Review on Knowledge management”, Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pintelon, L, & Van Puyvdelde, F, (1997) “ Maintenance Performance Reporting Systems: Some Experiences”, Central for Industrial Management, Leuve, Belgium and Glaverbel, Mol, Belgium, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Vol 3 No 1, 1997, pp, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turban, E, & Aronson, J, (1997), “Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems”, 5th edition, Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sherwin, D (2000), “A Review of Overall Models for Maintenance Management”, Journal of Quality in Management, Vol. 6 No. 3. 2000. pp. 138–164.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waeyenbergh, G, Pintelon, L (2002), “A Framework for Maintenance Concept Development”, International Journal of Production Economics, pp.299–313

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Mathew Jim Kennedy Lin Ma Andy Tan Deryk Anderson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 CIEAM/MESA

About this paper

Cite this paper

Al-Najjar, B. (2006). A Model to Diagnose the Deviation in the Maintenance Performance Measures. In: Mathew, J., Kennedy, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Anderson, D. (eds) Engineering Asset Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-583-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-814-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics