Skip to main content

Load-Independent Condition Assessment of Gears Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit Test and Autoregressive Modeling

  • Conference paper

Abstract

A novel technique for detection of gearbox deterioration is proposed in this study. The proposed technique makes use of a time-varying autoregressive model and establishes a compromised autoregressive model based on healthy-state gear motion residual signals under varying load conditions and employs the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test statistic as a measure of gear condition. The order of the time-varying autoregressive model is selected by using a proposed fully automatic and highly effective model order selection technique with the aid of hypothesis tests. Validation of the proposed technique is carried out by using both simulated and real entire lifetime gear vibration signals and demonstrates that the proposed technique possesses appealing effectiveness in identifying the optimum autoregressive model order for robust gear condition detection under varying load conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. McFadden PD. (1986) Detecting fatigue cracks in gears by amplitude and phase modulation of the meshing vibration. ASME Transactions Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and Reliability in Design, 108(2), 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McFadden PD. (1988) Determining the location of a fatigue crack in a gear from the phase of the change in the meshing vibration. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2(4), 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalpiaz G, Rivola A and Rubini R. (2000) Effectiveness and sensitivity of vibration processing techniques for local fault detection in gears. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 14(3), 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang W. (2001) Early detection of gear tooth cracking using the resonance demodulation technique. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 15(5), 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sung CK, Tai HM and Chen CW. (2000) Locating defects of a gear system by the technique of wavelet transform. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 35(8), 1169–1182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohue Y, Yoshida A and Seki M. (2004) Application of the wavelet transform to health monitoring and evaluation of dynamic characteristics in gear sets. Proceedings of the I MECH E Part J Journal of Engineering Tribology, 218(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nikolaou NG and Antoniadis IA. (2002) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet packets. NDT & E International, 35(3), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrade FA, Esat II and Badi MNM. (2001) Gear condition monitoring by a new application of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Proceedings of the I MECH E Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 215(6), 653–661.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kar C and Mohanty AR. (2004) Application of KS test in ball bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 269(1–2), 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall LD and Mba D. (2004) Acoustic emissions diagnosis of rotor-stator rubs using the KS statistic. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18(4), 849–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W and Wong AK. (2002) Autoregressive model-based gear fault diagnosis. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 124(2), 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhan YM, Makis V and Jardine AKS. (2006) Adaptive state detection of gearboxes under varying load conditions based on parametric modeling. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(1), 188–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MDTB test-run data CD: TR#14, Condition-Based Maintenance Department, Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Byington CS and Kozlowski JD. (1998) Transitional data for estimation of gearbox remaining useful life. Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, MDTB test-run data CDs.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller AJ. (1999) A new wavelet basis for the decomposition of gear motion error signals and its application to gearbox diagnostics. M.S. thesis, The Graduate School of The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin D, Wiseman M, Banjevic D and Jardine AKS. (2004) An approach to signal processing and condition-based maintenance for gearboxes subject to tooth failure. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18(5), 993–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Law AM and Kelton WD. (1991) Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 387–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Mathew Jim Kennedy Lin Ma Andy Tan Deryk Anderson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 CIEAM/MESA

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhan, Y.M., Mechefske, C.K. (2006). Load-Independent Condition Assessment of Gears Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit Test and Autoregressive Modeling. In: Mathew, J., Kennedy, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Anderson, D. (eds) Engineering Asset Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-583-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-814-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics