Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leveraging Design Process Related Intellectual Capital — A Key to Enhancing Enterprise Agility

  • Chapter
Collaborative Product Design and Manufacturing Methodologies and Applications

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

10.7 References

  1. Berden, T. P. J., Brombacher, A. C. and Sander, P. C., 2000, “The building bricks of product quality: an overview of some basic concepts and principles,” International Journal of Production Economics, 67, pp. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braha, D. and Maimon, O., 1998, A Mathematical Theory of Design: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications, Kluwer, Boston, pp. 241–278.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bras, B., Mistree, F., 1991, “Designing Design Processes in Decision-Based Concurrent Engineering,” SAE Transactions Journal of Materials & Manufacturing, pp. 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bras, B. A. and Mistree, F., 1991, “Designing design processes in decision-based concurrent engineering,” SAE Transactions, Journal of Materials & Manufacturing (SAE Paper 912209), SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 100, pp. 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Browning, T. R. and Eppinger, S. D., 2002, “Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development,” IEEE TRansactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), pp. 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran, J. K., Lee, K. J., McDowell, D. L. and Sanders, T. H., 2002, “Multifunctional metallic honeycombs by thermal chemical processing,” Processing and Properties of Lightweight Cellular Metals and Structures, pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conner (Seepersad), C. G., DeKroon, J. P. and Mistree, F., 1999, “A product variety tradeoff evaluation method for a family of cordless drill transmissions,” ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, NV. Paper Number: DETC99/DAC-8625.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eastman, C. M., Lee, G. and Sacks, R., 2002, “Deriving a product model from process models,” ISPE/CE2002 Conference, Cranfield University, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards, J. D., 2002, Product Life Cycle Mangement: A White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elmaghraby, S. E., 1995, “Activity nets: a guided tour through some recent developments,” European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), pp. 383–408.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Engenious Inc., 2004, FIPER, http://www.engineous.com/product_FIPER.htm

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engineous Inc., 2004, iSIGHT, Version 8.0, http://www.engineous.com/product_iSIGHT.htm

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eppinger, S., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. and Gebala, D. A., 1994, “A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development,” Research in Engineering Design, 6(1), pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183, 1993, Integrated Definition for Functional Modeling (IDEF 0), http://www.idef.com/Downloads/pdf/idef0.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fenves, S. J., 2001, A Core Product Model for Representing Design Information. Gaithersburg, MD, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fenves, S. J., Sriram, D., Sudarsan, R. and Wang, F., 2003, “A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management,” International Symposium on Product Lifecycle Management, Bangalore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández, M. G., Seepersad, C. C., Rosen, D. W., Allen, J. K. and Mistree, F., 2001, “Utility-based decision, support for selection in engineering design,” 13th Internation Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Pittsburgh, PA. Paper Number: DETC2001/DAC-21106.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P. and Otto, K. N., 2000, “Modular platform-based product family design,” ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorti, S. R., Gupta, A., Kim, G. J., Sriram, R. D. and Wong, A., 1998, “An object-oriented representation for product and design process,” Computer Aided Design, 30(7), pp. 489–501.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes, A. M., Wang, A., Dempsey, B. M. and McDowell, D. L., 2004, “Mechanics of linear cellular alloys,” Mechanics of Materials, 36(8), pp. 691–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IBM, 2004, IBM Solutions, http://www-1.ibm.com/businesscenter/us/solutions/solutionarea.jsp?id=9351

    Google Scholar 

  22. Inc., A., 2004, HyperWorks Process Manager™ 6.0, http://www.uk.altair.com/software/procman.htm

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liker, J., Sobek, D., Ward, A. and Cristiano, J., 1996, “Involving suppliers in product development in the US and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(2), pp. 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, Y., 2002, Analyzing Reliability Problems in Concurrent Fast Product Development Processes, PhD Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, Technische Unversiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maher, M. L., 1990, Process Models for Design Synthesis. AI Magazine. Winter, pp. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maimon, O. and Braha, D., 1996, “On the complexity of the design synthesis problem,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 26(1), pp. 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin, M. V. and Ishii, K., 1997, “Design for variety: development of complexity indices and design charts,” ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Sacramento, CA. Paper Number: DETC97/DFM-4359.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martin, M. V. and Ishii, K., 2000, “Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures,” ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Baltimore, MD. Paper Number: DETC2000/DFM-14021.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McGinnis, L. F., 1999, “BPR and logistics: the role of computational models,” 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (WSC), Dec 5–Dec 8 1999, Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp. 1365–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer, M. H., 1997, “Revitalize your product lines through continuous platform renewal,” Research Technology Management, 40(2), pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mistree, F., Bras, B. A., Smith, W. F. and Allen, J. K., 1996, “Modeling design processes: a conceptual, decision-based perspective,” International Journal of Engineering Design and Automation, 1(4), pp. 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mistree, F., Hughes, O. F. and Bras, B. A., 1993, “The compromise decision support problem and the adaptive linear programming algorithm,” Structural Optimization: Status and Promise (M. P. Kamat, Eds.), AIAA, Washington, D.C., pp. 247–286.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mistree, F., Lewis, K. and Stonis, L., 1994, “Selection in the conceptual design of aircraft,” 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, FL, pp. 1153–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mistree, F., Muster, D., Shupe, J. A. and Allen, J. K., 1989, “A decisionbased perspective for the design of methods for systems design,” Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Hampton, Virginia. Paper Number: NASA CP 3031.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mistree, F., Smith, W. F., Bras, B., Allen, J. K. and Muster, D., 1990, “Decision-based design: a contemporary paradigm for ship design,” Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, New Jersey, 98, pp. 565–597.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mistree, F., Smith, W. F. and Bras, B. A., 1993, “A decision-based approach to concurrent engineering,” Handbook of Concurrent Engineering (H. R. Paresai and W. Sullivan, Eds.), Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 127–158.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mistree, F., Smith, W. F., Kamal, S. Z. and Bras, B. A., 1991, “Designing decisions: axioms, models and marine applications,” Fourth International Marine Systems Design Conference, Kobe, Japan, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mocko, G. M., Panchal, J. H., Fernández, M. G., Peak, R. and Mistree, F., 2004, “Towards reusable knowledge-based idealizations for rapid design and analysis,” 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, Palm Springs, CA. Paper Number: AIAA-2004-2009.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Muster, D. and Mistree, F., 1988, “The decision support problem technique in engineering design,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 4(1), pp. 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nell, J., 2003, STEP on a Page (ISO 10303), http://www.nist.gov/sc5/soap/

    Google Scholar 

  41. Newcomb, P. J., Bras, B. A. and Rosen, D. W., 1996, “Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle,” 1996 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, California. Paper Number: DETC-96/DTM-1516.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Phoenix Integration Inc., 2004, ModelCenter®, Version 5.0, http://www.phoenix-int.com/products/ModelCenter.html

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rechtin, E. and Maier, M. W., 1997, “The art of systems architecting,” Systems Engineering Series, Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rogers, J. L. and Christine, B., 1994, “Ordering design tasks based on coupling strengths,” 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, Florida. Paper Number: AIAA-94-4326.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sacks, R., Eastman, C. M. and Lee, G., 2004, “Process model perspectives on management and engineering procedures in the north American precast / prestressed concrete industry,” ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2), pp. 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schlenoff, C., Knutilla, A. and Ray, S., 1996, Unified Process Specification Language: Requirements for Modeling Process. Gaithersburg, MD, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schlenoff, C., Tissot, F., Valois, J., Lubell, J. and Lee, J., 2000, The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification. Gaithersburg, MD, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seepersad, C. C., Dempsey, B. M., Allen, J. K., Mistree, F. and McDowell, D. L., 2002, “Design of multifunctional honeycomb materials,” 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA. Paper Number: AIAA-2002-5626.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seepersad, C. C., Mistree, F. and Allen, J. K., 2002, “A quantitative approach for designing multiple product platforms for an evolving portfolio of products,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Advances in Design Automation, Montreal, Canada. Paper Number: DETC2002/DAC-34096.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shah, J. J., Rangaswamy, S., Qureshi, S. and Urban, S. D., 1998, “Formal ontologies and representation of design processes and rationale,” IFIP WG5.2 CAD Conference, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shah, J. J., Rangaswamy, S., Qureshi, S. and Urban, S. D., 1999, “Design history system: data models and prototype implementation,” Knowledge Intensive CAD (M. Tomiyama, Finger, Ed.), Kluwer, pp. 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Shimomura, Y., Yoshioka, M., Takeda, H., Umeda, Y. and Tomiyama, T., 1998, “Representation of design object based on the functional evolution process model,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(2), pp. 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Simon, H. A., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Simpson, T., Lautenschlager, U., Mistree, F., 1998, “Mass customization in the age of information: the case for open engineering systems,” The Information Revolution Current and Future Consequences (Alan, W. H. R. and Porter, L. Eds.), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwhich Connecticut, pp. 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Simpson, T. W., Rosen, D., Allen, J. K. and Mistree, F., 1998, “Metrics for assessing design freedom and information certainty in the early stages of design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), pp. 628–635.

    Google Scholar 

  56. StreamlineSCM, 2004, Enterprise Transaction Model, http://www.streamlinescm.com/

    Google Scholar 

  57. Supply Chain Council, 2004, Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model, http://www.supply-hain.org/slides/SCOR5.0OverviewBooklet.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ullman, D. G., 1992, “A taxonomy for mechanical design,” Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), pp. 179–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  59. Ulrich, K., 1995, “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm,” Research Policy, 24(3), pp. 419–440.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Ward, A., Liker, J., Cristiano, J. and Sobek, D., 1995, “The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster,” Sloan Management Review, 36(3), pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B., 1992, Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wood, W. H., 2000, “Quantifying design freedom in decision based conceptual design,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, Maryland. Paper Number: DETC2000/DTM-14577.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wood, W. H., 2001, “A view of design theory and methodology from the standpoint of design freedom,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Paper Number: DETC2001/DTM-21717.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Workshop Report, 2004, Simulation-Based Engineering Science. Arlington, VA, USA, National Science Foundation: pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Realization Laboratory G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

    Jitesh H. Panchal, Marco Gero Fernández, Christiaan J. J. Paredis, Janet K. Allen & Farrokh Mistree

Authors
  1. Jitesh H. Panchal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Gero Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christiaan J. J. Paredis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janet K. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Farrokh Mistree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK

    W. D. Li PhD (Senior Lecturer) & Chris McMahon (Professor) (Senior Lecturer) &  (Professor)

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, 117576, Singapore

    S. K. Ong PhD (Associate Professor) & Andrew Y. C. Nee PhD (DEng, Professor) (Associate Professor) &  (DEng, Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panchal, J.H., Fernández, M.G., Paredis, C.J.J., Allen, J.K., Mistree, F. (2007). Leveraging Design Process Related Intellectual Capital — A Key to Enhancing Enterprise Agility. In: Li, W.D., McMahon, C., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C. (eds) Collaborative Product Design and Manufacturing Methodologies and Applications. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-802-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-802-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-801-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-802-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation