Skip to main content

An Adaptable Service-based Framework for Distributed Product Realization

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

1.8 References

  1. Schmidt, D. C., 2002, Distributed Object Computing with CORBA Middleware, http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/corba.html

    Google Scholar 

  2. Microsoft, 1996, DCOM Technical Overview, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndcom/html/msdn_dcomtec.asp

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sriram, R. D., Szykman S. and Durham, D., 2006, “Guest editorial — special issue on collaborative engineering,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering: Special Issue on Collaborative Engineering, 6(2), pp. 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, T. W., Lanutenschlager U. and Mistree, F., 1998, “Mass customization in the age of information: the case for open engineering systems,” The Information Revolution: Present and Future Consequences (W. H. Read and A. L. Porter, Eds.), Ablex Publishing Co., Greenwich, CT, pp. 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosen, D. W., 1998, “Progress towards a distributed product realization studio: the rapid tooling testbed,” 3rd IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop, Proceedings of Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (KIC-3), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith G. and Weerawarana, S., 2001, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil J. and Pardasani, A., 2001, “Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends,” Computer Aided Design, 34(13), pp. 981–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, A. H., Kulkarni, R., Allen, J., Rosen, D. W., Mistree F. and Feng, S. C., 2001, “A Web based distributed product realization environment,” ASME Computers in Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Paper Number: DETC2001/CIE-21766.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chalfan, K. M., 1986, “A knowledge system which integrates heterogeneous software for a design application,” Application of Artificial Intelligence to Engineering Problems, Southhampton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodgers, P. A., Huxor, A. P. and Caldwell, N. H. M., 1999, “Design support using distributed web based AI tools,” Research in Engineering Design, 11(1), pp. 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, G. Q., Lee, S. W. and Mak, K. L., 1999, “Web based product and process data modeling in concurrent ‘design for X’,” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(1), pp. 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cramer, D., Jayaram, U. and Jayaram, S., 2002, “A collaborative architecture for multiple computer aided engineering applications,” ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada. Paper Number: DETC2002/CIE-34498.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ebbesmeyer, P., Gausemeier, J., Krumm, H. and Molt, T., 2001, “Virtual Web plant: an Internet-based plant engineering information system,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 1(2), pp. 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, P., Bjarnemo, R. and Motte, D., 2005, “A Web-based interactive virtual environment for mobile phone customization,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5(1), pp. 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, R. and Afjeh, A. A., 2004, “Development of XML data binding integration for Web-enabled aircraft engine simulation,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(3), pp. 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson, T. W., Umapathy, K., Nanda, J., Halbe, S. and Hodge, B., 2003, “Development of a framework for Web-based product platform customization,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 3(2), pp. 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, F. and Wright, P., 1998, “Internet-based design and manufacturing on an open architecture machine center,” Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Otsu, Japan, pp. 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, C. S., Kim, N., Kim, Y., Kang, S. and O’Gardy, P., 1998, “Internetbased concurrent engineering: an interactive 3d system with markup,” Proceedings of Concurrent Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 555–563.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta, S. K., Lin, E., Lo, A. J. and Xu, C., 2002, “Web-based innovation alert services to support product design evolution,” ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada. Paper Number: DETC2002/CIE-34462.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shyamsundar, N., Dani, T., Sonthi, R. and Gadh, R., 1998, “Shape abstractions and representations to enable Internet-based collaborative CAD,” Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Otsu, Japan, pp. 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rezayat, M., 2000, “The enterprise-Web portal for life-cycle support,” Computer Aided Design, 32(2), pp. 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, P., Fukuda, S. and Raper, S. A., 2002, “TeleDM: an Internet Web service testbed for fast product design supported by prototype manufacturing,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2(2), pp. 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J., Ma, Z.-D. and Hulbert, G. M., 2005, “A distributed mechanical system simulation platform based on a “gluing algorithm”,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5(1), pp. 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ANSYS, 2006, ANSYS Workbench™, http://www.ansys.com/products/workbench.asp

    Google Scholar 

  25. MSC Software, 2006, MSC.Acumen, http://www.mscsoftware.com.my/products/software/msc/acumen/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  26. UGS, 2006, Teamcenter 2005, http://www.ugs.com/products/teamcenter/

    Google Scholar 

  27. PTC, 2003, PTC Windchill, http://www.ptc.com/products/windchill/

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alibre, 2006, Alibre Design 9.1, http://www.alibre.com/products/

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cutkosky, M., Engelmore, R., Fikes, R., Genesereth, M., Gruber, T., Mark, W., Tenenbaum, J. and Weber, J., 1993, “PACT: an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems,” IEEE Computer, 26(1), pp. 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ray, S. R., 2002, “Interoperability standards in the semantic Web,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2(1), pp. 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rezayat, M., 2000, “Knowledge-based product development using XML and KC’s,” Computer Aided Design, 32(5–6), pp. 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen, G. R., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, J. and Gruber, T. R., 1995, “Collaborative engineering based on knowledge sharing agreements,” Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 3(2), pp. 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Toye, G., Cutkosky, M., Leifer, L., Tenenbaum, J. and Glicksman, J., 1994, “SHARE: a methodology and environment for collaborative product development,” International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 3(2), pp. 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajagopalan, S., Pinilla, J. M., Losleben, P., Tian, Q. and Gupta, S. K., 1998, “Integrated design and rapid manufacturing over the Internet,” ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, G.A. Paper Number: DETC98/CIE-5519.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Madhusudan, T., 2004, “An intelligent mediator-based framework for enterprise application integration,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(4), pp. 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, T., Xie, N. and Blackhurst, J., 2004, “Design and implementation of a distributed information system for collaborative product development,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(4), pp. 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pahng, F., Senin, N. and Wallace, D., 1998, “Distribution modeling and evaluation of product design problems,” Computer Aided Design, 30(6), pp. 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dabke, P., Cox, A. and Johnson, D., 1998, “NetBuilder: an environment for integrating tools and people,” Computer Aided Design, 30(6), pp. 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Engineous Inc., 2005, FIPER Infrastructure, http://www.engineous.com/product_FIPERInfrastructure.htm

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gerhard, F. J., Rosen, D. W., Allen, J. and Mistree, F., 2001, “A distributed product realization environment for design and manufacturing,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 1(3), pp. 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Choi, H.-J., 2001, A Framework for Distributed Product Realization, M.S. Thesis, Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wujek, B. A., Koch, P. N., McMillan, M. and Chiang, W.-S., 2002, “A distributed component based integration environment for multidisciplinary optimal and quality design,” 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA. Paper Number: AIAA2002-5476.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kao, K. J., Seeley, C. E., Yin, S., Kolonay, R. M., Rus, T. and Paradis, M., 2004, “Business-to-business virtual collaboration of aircraft engine combustor design,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(4), pp. 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Engineous Inc., 2004, iSIGHT, Version 8.0, http://www.engineous.com/product_iSIGHT.htm

    Google Scholar 

  45. Phoenix Integration Inc., 2004, ModelCenterŖ, Version 5.0, http://www.phoenix-int.com/products/ModelCenter.html

    Google Scholar 

  46. Panchal, J. H., Fernández, M. G., Paredis, C. J. J. and Mistree, F., 2004, “Reusable design processes via. modular, executable, decision-centric templates,” 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, New York. Paper Number: AIAA-2004-4601.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hayes, A. M., Wang, A., Dempsey, B. M. and McDowell, D. L., 2001, “Mechanics of linear cellular alloys,” Proceedings of IMECE, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seepersad, C. C., Dempsey, B. M., Allen, J. K., Mistree, F. and McDowell, D. L., 2002, “Design of multifunctional honeycomb materials,” 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA. Paper Number: Paper No. AIAA-2002-5626.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bras, B. A. and Mistree, F., 1991, “Designing design process in decisionbased concurrent engineering,” SAE Transactions, Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 100, pp. 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Muster, D. and Mistree, F., 1988, “The decision support problem technique in engineering design,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 4(1), pp. 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nell, J., 2003, STEP on a Page (ISO 10303), http://www.nist.gov/sc5/soap/

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schenck, D. A. and Wilson, P. R., 1994, Information Modeling: The EXPRESS Way, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. LKSoft, 2006, JSDAI, http://www.jsdai.net/

    Google Scholar 

  54. Engineous Inc., 2001, Product Overview: iSIGHT, http://www.engineous.com/overview.html

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ansys Inc., 2003, Ansys Products, http://www.ansys.com/ansys/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  56. Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn, N., Nielsen, H. F., Thatte, S. and Winer, D., 2000, Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/

    Google Scholar 

  57. Marcato, D., 2002, Distributed Computing With SOAP, http://www.devx.com/upload/free/features/vcdj/2000/04apr00/dm0400/dm0400.asp

    Google Scholar 

  58. Microsoft, 2003, SOAP Toolkit 3.0, http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?URL=/downloads/sample.asp?url=/msdn-files/027/001/948/msdncompositedoc.xml

    Google Scholar 

  59. Systinet Corporation, 2004, Systinet Server for Java, http://www.systinet.com/products/ssj/overview

    Google Scholar 

  60. OASIS, 2004, Introduction to UDDI: Important Features and Functional Concepts, http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-tech-wp.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  61. Brazier, F. M. T., Langen, P. H. G. v. and Treur, J., 1995, “Modeling conflict management in design: an explicit approach,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 9(4), pp. 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Scott, M. J., 1999, Formalizing Negotiation in Engineering Design, PhD Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Scott, M. J. and Antonsson, E. K., 1996, “Formalisms for negotiation in engineering design,” ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Irvine, CA. Paper Number: 96-DETC/DTM-1525.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Badhrinath, K. and Rao, J. R. J., 1996, “Modeling for concurrent design using game theory formulations,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4(4), pp. 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lewis, K. and Mistree, F., 1997, “Modeling interaction in multidisciplinary design: a game theoretic approach,” AIAA Journal, 35(8), pp. 1387–1392.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Lewis, K. and Mistree, F., 1998, “Collaborative, Sequential and Isolated Decisions in Design,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), pp. 643–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Marston, M., 2000, Game Based Design: A Game Theory Based Approach to Engineering Design, PhD Dissertation, G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rao, S. S. and Freihet, T. I., 1991, “A modified game theory approach to multiobjective optimization,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 113(3), pp. 286–291.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Petrie, C. J., Webster, T. A. and Cutkosky, M. R., 1995, “Using Pareto optimality to coordinate distributed agents,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 9(4), pp. 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panchal, J.H., Choi, HJ., Allen, J.K., Rosen, D., Mistree, F. (2007). An Adaptable Service-based Framework for Distributed Product Realization. In: Li, W.D., McMahon, C., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C. (eds) Collaborative Product Design and Manufacturing Methodologies and Applications. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-802-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-802-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-801-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-802-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics