Skip to main content

Management of Volume Overload in Acute Heart Failure: Diuretics and Ultrafiltration

  • Chapter
Acute Heart Failure

Abstract

Approximately 1 million hospitalizations, with an estimated cost of $28 billion, occur annually in the United States due to acutely decompensated heart failure1. Data from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) show that 90% of hospitalizations for acutely decompensated heart failure are due to fluid overload in patients who have failed treatment with oral diuretics2. The average length of stay for acutely decompensated heart failure is 4.3 days, and 42% of the patients are discharged without complete resolution of symptoms. With current treatment strategies, 50% of the patients lose ≤5 lbs from the admission weight and 20% gain weight during the hospitalization2. The failure to effectively resolve congestion and reduce weight may contribute to readmission rates, which may be as high as 50% at 6 months3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2006 Update. A Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and the Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006;113:e85–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams KF, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J 2005;149:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aghababian RV. Acutely decompensated heart failure: opportunities to improve care and outcomes in the emergency department. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2002;3(suppl 4):S3–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J Med 1999;341:577–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellison DH. Diuretic therapy and resistance in congestive heart failure. Cardiology 2001;96:132–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler J, Forman DE, Abraham WT, et al. Relationship between heart failure treatment and development of worsening renal function among hospitalized patients. Am Heart J 2004;147:331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuberg GW, Miller AB, O’Connor CM, et al. for the PRAISE Investigators. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation. Diuretic resistance predicts mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Am Heart J 2002;144:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis GS, Benedict C, Johnstone DE, et al. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies Of Left ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 1990;82:1724–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gottlieb SS, Brater DC, Thomas I, et al. BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, protects against the decline in renal function observed with diuretic therapy. Circulation 2002;105:1348–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ronco C, Ricci Z, Bellomo R, Bedogni F. Extracorporeal ultrafiltration for the treatment of overhydration and congestive heart failure. Cardiology 2001;96:155–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose BD. Diuretics. Kidney Int 1991;39:336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Odlind B, Beermann B Renal tubular secretion and effects of furosemide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980;27:784–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brater DC. Diuretics pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In: van Boxtel CJ, Holford NHG, Danhof M, eds. In Vivo Study of Drug Action: Principles and Applications of Kinetic-Dynamic Modeling. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992:253–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davies DL, Lant AF, Millard NR, Smith AJ, Ward JW, Wilson GM. Renal action, therapeutic use, and pharmacokinetics of the diuretic bumetanide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974;15:141–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz S, Brater DC, Pound D, Greene PK, Kramer WG, Rudy D. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of torsemide in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993;54:90–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson JA, Sundblad KJ, Becker PK, Gorski JC, Rudy DW, Brater DC. Role of duration of diuretic effect in preventing sodium retention. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997;62:203–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brater DC. Diuretic therapy. N Engl J Med 1998;339:387–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greither A, Goldman S, Edelen JS, Benet LZ, Cohn K. Pharmacokinetics of furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure. Pharmacology 1979;19:121–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brater DC, Chennavasin P, Seiwell R. Furosemide in patients with heart failure: shift in dose-response curves. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980;28:182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Voelker JR, Cartwright-Brown D, Anderson S, et al. Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Kidney Int 1987;32:572–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerlag PGG, van Meijel JJM. High-dose furosemide in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:286–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dikshit K, Vyden JK, Forrester JS, Chatterjee K, Prakash R, Swan HJC. Renal and extrarenal hemodynamic effects of furosemide in congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1973;288:1087–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson JR, Reicheck N, Dunkman WB, Goldberg S. Effect of diuresis on the performance of the left ventricle in man. Am J Med 1981;70:234–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayliss J, Norell M, Canepa-Anson R, Sutton G, Poole-Wilson P. Untreated heart failure: clinical and neuroendocrine effects of increasing diuretics. Br Heart J 1987;57:17–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Knight RK, Miall PA, Hawkins LA, Dacombe J, Edwards CRW, Hamer J. Relation of plasma aldosterone concentration to diuretic treatment in patients with severe heart disease. Br Heart J 1979;42:316–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCurley JM, Hanlon SU, Wei S, et al. Furosemide and the progression of left ventricular dysfunction in experimental heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1301–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber KT, Barilla CG. Pathological hypertrophy and cardiac interstitium: fibrosis and reninangiotensin-aldosterone system. Circulation 1991;83:1849–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnston GD, Hiatt WR, Nies AS, Payne A, Murphy RC, Gerber JG. Factors modifying the early nondiuretic vascular effects of furosemide in man. Circ Res 1983;53:630–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan DB, Davidson C. Hypokalemia and diuretics: an analysis of publications. Br Med J 1980;280:905–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dyckner T, Helmers C, Lundman T, Wester PO. Initial serum potassium level in relation to early complications and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand 1975;197;201–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pelleg A, Mitamura H, Price R, Kaplinski E, Menduke H, Dreifus LS, Michelson EL. Extracellular potassium ion dynamics and ventricular arrhythmias in the canine heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:941–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gottlieb SS. Importance of magnesium in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:39G–42G.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. White MG, van Gelder J, Estes G. The effect of loop diuretics on the excretion of Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Cl. J Clin Pharmacol 1981;21:610–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schuster CJ, Weil MH, Besso J, Carpio M, Henning RJ. Blood volume following diuresis induced by furosemide. Am J Med 1984;76:585–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scherer B, Weber PC. Time-dependent changes in prostaglandin excretion in response to furosemide in man. Clin Sci 1979;56:77–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kramer BK, Schweda F, Riegger GAJ. Diuretic treatment and diuretic resistance in heart failure. Am J Med 1999;106:90–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schrier RW, Abdallah J, Weinberger H, Abraham WT. Therapy of heart failure. Kidney Int 2000;57:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. He XR, Greenberg S, Briggs J, Schnerman J. Effects of furosemide and verapamil on the NaCl dependency of macula densa-mediated secretion. Hypertension 1995;26:137–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hrich DE. Captopril-induced renal insufficiency and the role of sodium balance. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:222–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Salvador DRK, Rey NR, Ramos GC, Punzalan FER. Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD003178.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aaser E, Gullestad L, Tollofsrud S, et al. Effect of bolus injection versus continuous infusion of furosemide on diuresis and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Scand J Lab Invest 1997;57:361–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bagatin J, Sardelic S, Gancevic I, et al. Diuretic efficiency of furosemide in continuous intravenous infusion vs. bolus injection in congestive heart failure: results of a pilot study. Pharmaca 1993;31:279–86.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dormans TPJ, van Meyel JJM, Gerlag PGG, et al. Diuretic efficacy of high dose furosemide in severe heart failure: bolus injection versus continuous infusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:376–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kramer WG, Smith WB, Ferguson J, et al. Pharmacodynamics of torsemide administered as intravenous injection and as a continuous infusion to patients with congestive heart failure. J Clin Pharmacol 1996;36:265–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lahav M, Regev A, Ra’anani P, Theodor E. Intermittent administration of furosemide vs. continuous infusion preceded by a loading dose for congestive heart failure. Chest 1992;102:725–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Licata G, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, et al. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as a bolus, in refractory congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 2003;145:459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pivac N, Rumboldt D, Sardelic S, et al. Diuretic effects of furosemide infusion versus bolus injection in congestive heart failure. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 1998;18:121–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schuller D, Lynch J, Fine D. Protocol-guided diuretic management: comparison of furosemide by continuous infusion and intermittent bolus. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1969–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Paganini EP, Flague J, Whiman G, et al. Amino acid balance in patients with oliguric renal failure undergoing slow continuous ultrafiltration (SCUF). Trans Am Soc Artif Int Org 1982;28:615–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Metha RL. Fluid management in CRRT. Contrib Nephrol 2001;132:335–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Marenzi GC, Lauri G, Grazi M, et al. Circulatory response to fluid overload removal by extracorporeal ultrafiltration in refractory congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:963–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rimondini A, Cipolla CM, Della Bella P, et al. Hemofiltration as short-term treatment for refractory congestive heart failure. Am J Med 1987;83:43–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Marenzi G, Grazi S, Lauri G, et al. Interrelation of humoral factors, hemodynamics and fluid and salt metabolism in congestive heart failure: effects of extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Am J Med 1993;94:49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Agostoni PG, Marenzi GC, Lauri G, et al. Sustained improvement in functional capacity after removal of body fluid with isolated ultrafiltration in chronic cardiac insufficiency: failure of furosemide to provide the same result. Am J Med 1994;96:191–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Canaud B, Leray-Moragues H, Garred, et al. Slow isolated ultrafiltration for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Am Kidney Dis 1996;28(suppl):S67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cipolla CM, Grazi S, Rimondini A, et al. Changes in circulating norepinephrine with hemofiltration in advanced congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:987–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bergerone S, Golzio PG, Pacitti A. Atrial natriuretic factor and concomitant hormonal, hemodynamic and renal function changes after slow continuous ultrafiltration. Int J Cardiol 1992;36:305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Blake P, Hasewaga Y, Khosla MC, et al. Isolation of “myocardial depressant factor(s)” from the ultrafiltrate of heart failure patients with acute renal failure. ASAIO J 1996;42:M911–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Coraim FI, Wolner E. Continuous hemofiltration for the failing heart. New Horiz 1995;3:725–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Burchardi H. History and development of continuous renal replacement techniques. Kidney Int 1998;66(suppl):S120–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kramer P, Wigger W, Rieger J, et al. Arteriovenous haemofiltration: a new and simple method for treatment of overhydrated patients resistant to diuretics. Klin Wochenschr 1977;55:1121–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Canaud B, Cristol JP, Klouche K, et al. Slow continuous ultrafiltration: a means of unmasking myocardial functional reserve in end stage cardiac disease. Contrib Nephrol 1991;93:79–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lepape A, Bene B, Pedrix JP, et al. Double pump driven continuous haemofiltration (CVVH). In: Siebert HG, Mann H, eds. Continuous Arteriovenous Haemofiltration. Basel: S Karger, 1985:53–8.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kramer P, Buhler J, Kehr A, et al. Intensive care potential of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Org 1982;28:28–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Grone HJ, Kramer P. Puncture and long term cannulation of the femoral artery and vein in adults. In: Kramer P, ed. Arteriovenous Hemofiltration. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Olbricht CJ, Schurek HJ, Stolte H, et al. The influence of vascular access mode on the efficiency of CAVH. In: Sieberth HG, Mann H, eds. Continuous Arteriovenous Hemofiltration. Basel: S Karger, 1985:14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dileo M, Pacitti A, Bergerone S, et al. Ultrafiltration in the treatment of refractory heart failure. Clin Cardiol 1988;11:449–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kishore K, Yagi N, Paganini E. Renal replacement therapy in congestive heart failure. Semin Dialysis 1997;10:259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Guazzi M, Agostoni P, Perego B. Apparent paradox of neurohumoral axis inhibition after body fluid volume depletion in patients with congestive heart failure and water retention. Br Heart J 1994;72:534–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Silverstein ME, Ford CA, Lysaght MJ, et al. Treatment of severe volume overload by ultrafiltration. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:747–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Jaski BE, Ha J, Denys BG, et al. Peripherally inserted veno-venous ultrafiltration for rapid treatment of volume overloaded patients. J Card Fail 2003;9:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Costanzo MR, Saltzberg MT, O’Sullivan JE, et al. Early ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2043–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bart BA, Boyle A, Bank AJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of ultrafiltration versus usual care for hospitalized patients with heart failure: relief for acutely fluid overloaded patients with decompensated congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2043–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costanzo, M.R. (2008). Management of Volume Overload in Acute Heart Failure: Diuretics and Ultrafiltration. In: Mebazaa, A., Gheorghiade, M., Zannad, F.M., Parrillo, J.E. (eds) Acute Heart Failure. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-782-4_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-782-4_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-781-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-782-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics