Advertisement

Training: Preparing the Robotics Team for Their First Case

  • Richard C. Sarle
  • Khurshid A. Guru
  • James O. Peabody

Abstract

Robotic prostatectomy is hard to learn but easy to do. Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment. Many surgeons have heard this aphorism and understand its truth. It is self-evident that adequate training can and should take the place of the bad judgment that comes from inexperience. What constitutes an adequate training experience will depend on many factors and is likely to vary from institution to institution. In this chapter, we will discuss our philosophy of and experience with training in robotic surgery at the Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI). This has developed and evolved over the almost 2400 robotic-assisted procedures, including radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, radical and partial nephrectomy, performed by our surgical teams.

Keywords

Radical Prostatectomy Robotic System Radical Cystectomy Port Placement Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guillonneau B, Vallencien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000;163:1643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, members of the VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289–2292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168: 945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tewari AT, Srivastava A, Menon M, VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92:205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menon M, Tewari A, VIP Team. Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points. Urology 2003;61:15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu J, Nelson R, Wilson T, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006;175: 541–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joseph J, Vicente I, Madeb R, et al. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int 2005;96:39–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 2005;66:105–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Sarle
    • 1
  • Khurshid A. Guru
    • 2
  • James O. Peabody
    • 1
  1. 1.Vattikuti Urology InstituteHenry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Department of Urologic OncologyRoswell Park Cancer InstituteBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations